mlloyd10 wrote:Santana/KJ Harrison for Mejia/Kipnis/Salazar
How do you propose we blackmail the Indians GM for this deal because that will never happen
mlloyd10 wrote:Santana/KJ Harrison for Mejia/Kipnis/Salazar
wichmae wrote:xTitan wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:
Barnes is good, Boone Logan is coming off injury but was signed as their LOOGY, and they have a ton of guys like Guerra and plenty of prospects where they want to limit innings this year to put in the pen at some point.
If the staff stays healthy, assuming they add 1 more starter, that means that if Nelson comes back, Woodruff may be moving there temporarily, Suter will probably be there for sure...there are a lot of reasonable options beyond the 2 studs.
I think it needs another piece but it's not that shallow.
I really disagree, you can't count on either Barnes (who has potential) or Logan at this point, most starters rarely go past 6 innings in today's baseball you need to lock down the 8th and 9th, they pissed away quite a few games with Barnes before Swarzak got here. Plus they had Swarzak if something happened to Knebel, now they have no back up closer.
That awesome set up man Swarzak was a NRI for the White Sox last year. Truth is we have zero idea where the over performing reliever may come from and chances are he's on the 40 already
Kerb Hohl wrote:jimmybones wrote:For the talk of Braun to 1B to keep Santana. Why not Santana to 1B in that scenario? I’m not saying that’s the best route. But in a vacuum, if one is moving, why not Santana? He’s like 6’5 and not a great OF.
Then Phillips as the 4th OF and insurance for Braun/Cain against injury and off days needed. Keep Aguilar to backup 1st as essentially a pinch hitter, which he’s really good at. He’s also your insurance in case the Santana at 1st experiment doesn’t work. Then you trade Santana for a pitcher and promote Aguilar.
Trade bait for a pitcher is then Broxton, Thames, and a non Ortiz/Woodruff/Burnes pitching prospect. Or better yet sign a decent SP and keep all our ML ready talent and still have a good amount of trade chips to add whatever is needed in season. Up the monetary amount(not years) to get Darvish signed and keep all our other assets.
CF Cain
RF Yelich
LF Braun
3B Shaw
1B Santana
2B Villar/Perez (Sogard bench)
C Pina
SS Arcia
SP
Darvish (or other FA)
Anderson
Davies
Chacin
Woodruff
***Nelson*** hopefully
Maybe a minor move or two of a guy(s) like Broxton, Thames, mid level prospects for more pitchers- RP or SP options.
I don't mind the idea of Santana to 1B, but if any RH hitter is going to 1B at all, Aguilar loses a lot of steam. Can't hit righties that well. I'd rather use the spot for more defensive versatility or a lefty power bat off the bench.
xTitan wrote:wichmae wrote:xTitan wrote:I really disagree, you can't count on either Barnes (who has potential) or Logan at this point, most starters rarely go past 6 innings in today's baseball you need to lock down the 8th and 9th, they pissed away quite a few games with Barnes before Swarzak got here. Plus they had Swarzak if something happened to Knebel, now they have no back up closer.
That awesome set up man Swarzak was a NRI for the White Sox last year. Truth is we have zero idea where the over performing reliever may come from and chances are he's on the 40 already
But he wasn't on the 40 man last year, hence the pick up of Swarzak
jimmybones wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:jimmybones wrote:For the talk of Braun to 1B to keep Santana. Why not Santana to 1B in that scenario? I’m not saying that’s the best route. But in a vacuum, if one is moving, why not Santana? He’s like 6’5 and not a great OF.
Then Phillips as the 4th OF and insurance for Braun/Cain against injury and off days needed. Keep Aguilar to backup 1st as essentially a pinch hitter, which he’s really good at. He’s also your insurance in case the Santana at 1st experiment doesn’t work. Then you trade Santana for a pitcher and promote Aguilar.
Trade bait for a pitcher is then Broxton, Thames, and a non Ortiz/Woodruff/Burnes pitching prospect. Or better yet sign a decent SP and keep all our ML ready talent and still have a good amount of trade chips to add whatever is needed in season. Up the monetary amount(not years) to get Darvish signed and keep all our other assets.
CF Cain
RF Yelich
LF Braun
3B Shaw
1B Santana
2B Villar/Perez (Sogard bench)
C Pina
SS Arcia
SP
Darvish (or other FA)
Anderson
Davies
Chacin
Woodruff
***Nelson*** hopefully
Maybe a minor move or two of a guy(s) like Broxton, Thames, mid level prospects for more pitchers- RP or SP options.
I don't mind the idea of Santana to 1B, but if any RH hitter is going to 1B at all, Aguilar loses a lot of steam. Can't hit righties that well. I'd rather use the spot for more defensive versatility or a lefty power bat off the bench.
I hear ya. I really like Aguilar and if we stay with Thames I’d rather see Aguilar play more. And Thames is a more ideal backup overall because of versatility and being a lefty with a righty starter. But I could see it working because we’d still have a lot of versatility with Perez and Villar defensively. I’d really like a bench of Phillips, Perez, Sogard, Aguilar, Vogt.
I’d basically be accepting Aguilars lack of versatility for:
1. Insurance policy for Santana not working at 1st.
2. Replacement for Santana if someone blows us away with a SP and/or 2B offer.
3. Fantastic pinch hitter
jimmybones wrote:For the talk of Braun to 1B to keep Santana. Why not Santana to 1B in that scenario? I’m not saying that’s the best route. But in a vacuum, if one is moving, why not Santana? He’s like 6’5 and not a great OF.
Gianstoppable wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:Santana/KJ Harrison for Mejia/Kipnis/Salazar
How do you propose we blackmail the Indians GM for this deal because that will never happen
mlloyd10 wrote:Love both deals especially since trwi7 hates them...
mlloyd10 wrote:No point in signing cain since it costs us a 3rd rd pick
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Gianstoppable wrote:I'm just wondering why the Jays would trade away Stroman and why the Tribe would get rid of any pitching.
jute2003 wrote:It would be pretty disheartening if all they did now was trade Santana for a couple prospects. Half assed win now efforts are poop and would make me really hate the Cain and Yelich moves. They need at least one proven high end starter. If they can play some meaningful Playoff Baseball over the next coulple years I'll be fine with the early 2020's being ugly. It's not my money and Prospect rankings only go so far.
El Duderino wrote:Did you miss that Cain signed for five years and Yelich is under contract for five years?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:El Duderino wrote:Did you miss that Cain signed for five years and Yelich is under contract for five years?
Umm, Cain is 32.
trwi7 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:Love both deals especially since trwi7 hates them...mlloyd10 wrote:No point in signing cain since it costs us a 3rd rd pick
We all have our strengths. I guess yours are contradicting yourself and making dumb **** trade proposals on message boards.
Thunder Muscle wrote:Gianstoppable wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:Santana/KJ Harrison for Mejia/Kipnis/Salazar
How do you propose we blackmail the Indians GM for this deal because that will never happen
Right. I know he likes to propose trades but yeesh...
mlloyd10 wrote:Thunder Muscle wrote:Gianstoppable wrote:
How do you propose we blackmail the Indians GM for this deal because that will never happen
Right. I know he likes to propose trades but yeesh...
Getting Mejia is a stretch, but Santana has more value than Kipnis/Salazar