ImageImage

2018 Brewers Discussion - Yelich Signing on Page 45

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,033
And1: 16,700
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1441 » by humanrefutation » Fri Feb 2, 2018 3:44 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:I used to post occasionally at BF, before this forum opened, but stopped many years ago when I got a warning for using "excessive" punctuation!!

I used two !! instead of one !.


Consider yourself warned. :D
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1442 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Feb 2, 2018 4:08 pm

Another tidbit from our friend at BF:

It will take Burns to get Archer. This I know.


It's going to be awfully hard for me to be ok with giving up a huge package centered around Burnes if that's what it would cost to get Archer. TB has all the leverage here.
ak7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,383
Joined: Jun 04, 2012

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1443 » by ak7 » Fri Feb 2, 2018 4:31 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Another tidbit from our friend at BF:

It will take Burns to get Archer. This I know.


It's going to be awfully hard for me to be ok with giving up a huge package centered around Burnes if that's what it would cost to get Archer. TB has all the leverage here.


Burns is massively overrated as a TOR arm.
User avatar
Ryan5UW
General Manager
Posts: 8,503
And1: 1,552
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Location: Madison, WI
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1444 » by Ryan5UW » Fri Feb 2, 2018 4:33 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Another tidbit from our friend at BF:

It will take Burns to get Archer. This I know.


It's going to be awfully hard for me to be ok with giving up a huge package centered around Burnes if that's what it would cost to get Archer. TB has all the leverage here.


Yeah, I'm becoming more and more of a proponent of trying to sign a FA to a big $ contract as opposed to making this type of trade.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1445 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Feb 2, 2018 5:06 pm

Ryan5UW wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Another tidbit from our friend at BF:

It will take Burns to get Archer. This I know.


It's going to be awfully hard for me to be ok with giving up a huge package centered around Burnes if that's what it would cost to get Archer. TB has all the leverage here.


Yeah, I'm becoming more and more of a proponent of trying to sign a FA to a big $ contract as opposed to making this type of trade.

I suspect the idea might be to try and do both.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1446 » by wichmae » Fri Feb 2, 2018 5:20 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
BallinBucks420 wrote:would you guys do a

Woodruff/Santana for Archer deal?? maybe we would have to throw in another prospect but that could maybe get it done depending on how much the rays like Santana...I wanna give phillips plenty of AB's in RF this year

If that's all it took to get Archer it would've been done a long time ago. They want a lot more.

The insider guy at BF posted this last night:

From what I know, a trade of Santana, Phillips, Burnes and Peralta is what TB want's for Archer.

Yeah....... I wouldnt do this. Not in a million years
User avatar
engelmartin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,804
And1: 2,387
Joined: Jun 03, 2013
         

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1447 » by engelmartin » Fri Feb 2, 2018 5:41 pm

wichmae wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:
BallinBucks420 wrote:would you guys do a

Woodruff/Santana for Archer deal?? maybe we would have to throw in another prospect but that could maybe get it done depending on how much the rays like Santana...I wanna give phillips plenty of AB's in RF this year

If that's all it took to get Archer it would've been done a long time ago. They want a lot more.

The insider guy at BF posted this last night:

From what I know, a trade of Santana, Phillips, Burnes and Peralta is what TB want's for Archer.

Yeah....... I wouldnt do this. Not in a million years

I don't normally post on here, but I have to chime in on this one. That trade would be Doug Melvin level bad.
KnicksGod wrote:Middleton probably the most underrated player in NBA History
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1448 » by Gianstoppable » Fri Feb 2, 2018 5:49 pm

wichmae wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:
BallinBucks420 wrote:would you guys do a

Woodruff/Santana for Archer deal?? maybe we would have to throw in another prospect but that could maybe get it done depending on how much the rays like Santana...I wanna give phillips plenty of AB's in RF this year

If that's all it took to get Archer it would've been done a long time ago. They want a lot more.

The insider guy at BF posted this last night:

From what I know, a trade of Santana, Phillips, Burnes and Peralta is what TB want's for Archer.

Yeah....... I wouldnt do this. Not in a million years


Id do that if they throw Jake in as well lol. That's a brutal deal
#FreeChuckDiesel
BallinBucks420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 877
And1: 117
Joined: Apr 17, 2014
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1449 » by BallinBucks420 » Fri Feb 2, 2018 6:14 pm

engelmartin wrote:
wichmae wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:If that's all it took to get Archer it would've been done a long time ago. They want a lot more.

The insider guy at BF posted this last night:


Yeah....... I wouldnt do this. Not in a million years

I don't normally post on here, but I have to chime in on this one. That trade would be Doug Melvin level bad.


Ya I'm out if they want that much....Archer shouldn't get that type of deal he's got good stuff but his ERA has been way to high for me to consider him being great...go free agent route or is there another guy out there via trade we could go
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1450 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Feb 2, 2018 6:16 pm

I don't see Stearns ever doing that specific deal because of how it would impact our MLB team as much as our prospect depth. Losing both Santana and Phillips in one trade isn't happening with Braun almost guaranteed to miss time and Cain not exactly always being a beacon of health either. I'm sure that was TB's initial ask but the problem is there really isn't a ton of incentive for them to lower their demands unless they know something about Archer that we don't. They have all the leverage and we are the ones aggressively looking to make a deal.
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,787
And1: 5,842
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1451 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Feb 2, 2018 6:16 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
BallinBucks420 wrote:would you guys do a

Woodruff/Santana for Archer deal?? maybe we would have to throw in another prospect but that could maybe get it done depending on how much the rays like Santana...I wanna give phillips plenty of AB's in RF this year

If that's all it took to get Archer it would've been done a long time ago. They want a lot more.

The insider guy at BF posted this last night:

From what I know, a trade of Santana, Phillips, Burnes and Peralta is what TB want's for Archer.



Ahhhhh, I say, ‘Go F yourself’.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,926
And1: 56,190
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1452 » by MickeyDavis » Fri Feb 2, 2018 7:48 pm

The specter of collusion – and the potential for resulting labor unrest – has lingered in the background during Major League Baseball’s slowest off-season in history.

And now a prominent player agent has taken that elephant in the room and given it center stage.

Brodie Van Wagenen, the lead baseball agent at Creative Artists Agency, accused MLB’s owners of conspiring to suppress the free agent market and warned that players might be willing to boycott spring training in solidarity if the market does not loosen.

Such a boycott would run afoul of federal labor laws, with the National Labor Relations Board likely issuing an immediate injunction. MLB is governed by the most recent collective bargaining agreement, ratified in December 2016 and running through 2021.

Van Wagenen wrote in a statement he tweeted Friday that behavior among owners “has changed dramatically” and that the activity “feels coordinated, rightly or wrongly.”

“Many club presidents and general managers with whom we negotiate with are frustrated with the lack of funds to sign the plethora of good players still available, raising further suspicion of institutional influence over the spending,” Van Wagenen wrote.

“Even the algorithms that have helped determine player salaries in recent years are suggesting dramatically higher values than owners are willing to spend.”

A backlog of impact players remain on the market with just 10 days remaining until spring training camps open. Seven of the consensus top 10 free agents, led by J.D. Martinez, Yu Darvish and Jake Arrieta, remain unsigned, and productive players such as Van Wagenen’s client, former New York Yankees third baseman Todd Frazier, remain days and perhaps weeks away from finding their place in this market.

More than 120 free agents remain unsigned.

So Van Wagenen, who has negotiated nine-figure contracts for the likes of Ryan Howard, Robinson Cano and Ryan Zimmerman, says players are ready to flex their collective will in a fashion not seen since the last player strike began in 1994.

“(Players) are outraged,” he wrote. “Players in the midst of long-term contracts are as frustrated as those still seeking employment. Their voices are getting louder and they are uniting in a way not seen since 1994.

“I would suggest that testing the will of 1,200 alpha males at the pinnacle of their profession is not a good strategy for 30 men (owners) who are bound by a much smaller fraternity.

“A fight is brewing. And it may begin with one, maybe two, and perhaps 1,200 willing to follow. A boycott of spring training may be a starting point if behavior does not start to change.”

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred said at Thursday’s owners’ meetings that a myriad of factors conspired to slow a market in which outfielder Lorenzo Cain (five years, $80 million) has signed the largest contract to date.

“Every [free-agent] market is different,’’ Manfred said. “There's different players, different quality of players, different GMs, different decisions, a new basic agreement, different agents who had particular prominence in a particular market in terms of who they represent.

“Those factors, and probably others that I can't tick off the top of my head, have combined to produce a particular market this year. Just like there's been some markets where the lid got blown off in terms of player salary growth, occasionally you're going to have some that are not quite as robust.’’

Baseball has not had a work stoppage since 1994-95, when owners’ threats of a salary cap caused players to walk out in August 1994. Labor peace has reigned since, but a luxury tax phased in since the last stoppage has in recent years served as a de facto cap for some teams.

While rhetoric has been minimal this winter, it is starting to ramp up. Los Angeles Dodgers closer Kenley Jansen said at his team's fan fest last weekend that players might want to consider striking. Super agent Scott Boras told USA TODAY Sports on Monday that a "non-competitive cancer" was ruining the game.



I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,053
And1: 5,443
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1453 » by JimmyTheKid » Fri Feb 2, 2018 7:58 pm

Attanasio obviously didn't get the memo.
User avatar
Eeavers57
Pro Prospect
Posts: 824
And1: 478
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Location: Minneapolis
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1454 » by Eeavers57 » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:22 pm

User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1455 » by LittleRooster » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:42 pm

They better not make that trade but I have a feeling Attanasio will be invovled...
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,033
And1: 16,700
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1456 » by humanrefutation » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:42 pm



Figured that he was gone when he was DFA'd.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,986
And1: 27,593
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1457 » by trwi7 » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:47 pm

LittleRooster wrote:They better not make that trade but I have a feeling Attanasio will be invovled...


I very much doubt Attanasio has ever been involved in trade discussions.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,986
And1: 27,593
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1458 » by trwi7 » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:49 pm

Oh God, now people on bf.net are believing the Brewer World twitter account even after being told yesterday that it's a fake account.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,707
And1: 3,200
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1459 » by jimmybones » Fri Feb 2, 2018 9:22 pm

Gianstoppable wrote:Davies is a good pitcher but that's it, he doesn't blow by guys.



Im not sure if there was a typo that you fixed or if I was just seeing things, but I’m going to pretend it still says “my” because I enjoy this gif reply so much to thinking you accidentally wrote that Davies doesn’t blow your guys.

So. Where were we?


Gianstoppable wrote:Davies is a good pitcher but that's it, he doesn't blow my guys.


Image
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,787
And1: 5,842
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1460 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Feb 2, 2018 10:25 pm

ak7 wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Another tidbit from our friend at BF:

It will take Burns to get Archer. This I know.


It's going to be awfully hard for me to be ok with giving up a huge package centered around Burnes if that's what it would cost to get Archer. TB has all the leverage here.


Burns is massively overrated as a TOR arm.


Can't tell if serious...
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.

Return to Milwaukee Brewers