ImageImage

Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#241 » by Jollay » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:35 pm

trwi7 wrote:
Jollay wrote:
wichmae wrote:And compared to what the Nats were offering our deal isn't even close.


What were the Nats offering? I can't get any confirmation on the exact deal that the Nats had with them....


Jordan Zimmermann, Danny Espinosa and Drew Storen.


Thank you. Everything I had heard was that they wouldn't give up JZ. Must have relented but got KC to accept Espinosa over Desmond.

Interesting. Nats package was at least safer for the Royals, but I can't say it was ALOT better...
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#242 » by wichmae » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:40 pm

Zimmerman Storen and Espinosa is alot better than what the Crew gave up.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#243 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:40 pm

Another name to add to the SS list is Nick Punto. He's an awful hitter, but a really good defender. So basically he's Escobar from last year, maybe slightly better on defense. If we could sign him, with the guaranteed starting job for maybe $2 million that'd be a solid deal.

And we still need to trade for Cameron. :)
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#244 » by wichmae » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:42 pm

Good call twirls
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#245 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:43 pm

wichmae wrote:Zimmerman Storen and Espinosa is alot better than what the Crew gave up.


A LOT better. We're lucky Greinke didn't want to go to DC.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#246 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:51 pm

And for the people who are butthurt after giving up Odorizzi...really reminds of the Will Inman situation. Remember him? Remember how he was going to be a stud for the Padres? Brewers fans were irate we traded him.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#247 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:53 pm

We were irate we traded him for a middle reliever.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#248 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:54 pm

trwi7 wrote:We were irate we traded him for a middle reliever.


At least Linebrink's playing in the big leagues.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,784
And1: 6,993
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#249 » by LUKE23 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:55 pm

DannoMac20 wrote:And for the people who are butthurt after giving up Odorizzi...really reminds of the Will Inman situation. Remember him? Remember how he was going to be a stud for the Padres? Brewers fans were irate we traded him.


Your hyperbole is taking over this thread. Do you see anyone pissed about this trade? And those two situations aren't even comparable.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#250 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:58 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
DannoMac20 wrote:And for the people who are butthurt after giving up Odorizzi...really reminds of the Will Inman situation. Remember him? Remember how he was going to be a stud for the Padres? Brewers fans were irate we traded him.


Your hyperbole is taking over this thread. Do you see anyone pissed about this trade? And those two situations aren't even comparable.


You've been bitching about how we traded Odorizzi for the past 2 pages like he's gonna be Felix Hernandez. I simply posted that to compare it to another situation of when we traded our "top prospect SP". They are comparable, Luke. They're just not comparable in your eyes, because you disagree with whatever you can on these boards.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,784
And1: 6,993
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#251 » by LUKE23 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:01 pm

You've been bitching about how we traded Odorizzi for the past 2 pages like he's gonna be Felix Hernandez. I simply posted that to compare it to another situation of when we traded our "top prospect SP". They are comparable, Luke. They're just not comparable in your eyes, because you disagree with whatever you can on these boards.


Reading is your friend. I actually haven't. I like the trade. I was more debating the notion that there is no cutoff for when the trade is good or bad. I also feel that giving up four prospects means we have to extend Greinke as well.

And no, trading Odorizzi, who was higher ceiling than Inman, for a stud SP is different than trading Inman for a relief pitcher, especially when we are talking a package trade. Not comparable.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,225
And1: 16,918
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#252 » by humanrefutation » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:02 pm

At this point, if we're going to go all in, we still have to go all the way. I agree that picking up Cam and/or a SS would be helpful.

These moves have decimated our potential depth - Cain, Escobar, and Jeffress were going to be major contributors this coming season. We need to fill those holes, too.

Gotta do the following:

Re-sign Counsell.
Re-sign Weeks.
Sign another SS - Punto, Renteria, etc.
Make a move for an OF.
Add some depth to the bullpen.

The silver lining to this move is if the Brewers underperform our expectations next season, we can easily ship out Greinke or Marcum for a boatload of prospects in our own right, and start looking towards the future.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#253 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:03 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
You've been bitching about how we traded Odorizzi for the past 2 pages like he's gonna be Felix Hernandez. I simply posted that to compare it to another situation of when we traded our "top prospect SP". They are comparable, Luke. They're just not comparable in your eyes, because you disagree with whatever you can on these boards.


Reading is your friend. I actually haven't. I like the trade. I was more debating the notion that there is no cutoff for when the trade is good or bad. I also feel that giving up four prospects means we have to extend Greinke as well.

And no, trading Odorizzi, who was higher ceiling than Inman, for a stud SP is different than trading Inman for a relief pitcher, especially when we are talking a package trade. Not comparable.


So after watching Odorizzi pitch 1 season in A-ball, what makes you say that he has a higher ceiling than Inman? I'm curious to know...because when we traded Inman he was projected as a #2-#3...and Odorizzi is projected as a #3-bullpen guy to many around the league.

Obviously the trade is different, but trading your top SP prospect twice isn't similar? What the hell?
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,757
And1: 3,297
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#254 » by jimmybones » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:05 pm

humanrefutation wrote:The silver lining to this move is if the Brewers underperform our expectations next season, we can easily ship out Greinke or Marcum for a boatload of prospects in our own right, and start looking towards the future.


Even by letting Fielder, Marcum and Greinke walk and taking comp picks we could end up with better prospects than what we had, plus a fun two year run.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#255 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:07 pm

Inman was never projected as a 2-3. Never.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,074
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#256 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:08 pm

trwi7 wrote:Inman was never projected as a 2-3. Never.


Are you kidding me?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#257 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:12 pm

He was considered backend/reliever based on stuff and a weird delivery.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,632
And1: 11,631
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#258 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:13 pm

A little bummed that Jeffress is leaving after Gammons and TH floated the possibility that we might get to keep him.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#259 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:15 pm

Jeffress is a reliever to me. Bad control and would take at least a couple years to build up enough innings to start. That's a sell high on Jeffress, which I'm fine with.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Escobar, Cain, Odirizzi and Jeffress for Greinke+ 

Post#260 » by trwi7 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:16 pm

Braun on the trade: "It says we're going for it. We're all in. I don't think anybody could ask for anything more."
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Milwaukee Brewers