ImageImage

Braun tests positive for PED | Presser update pg. 42

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
Sky High
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,818
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 03, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#501 » by Sky High » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:29 pm

I'm pretty surprised, but not stunned. Ryan Braun showed such confidence throughout the whole process. I was going to believe his word until proven guilty...

So happy it ended this way. This will reinvigorate the franchise and fanbase. Just imagine Braun's standing ovation on opening day. It's going to be out of control. I need to get tickets.

We are easily the favorites in the NL Central. Let's take a shot at the World Series, damnit!!
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,232
And1: 16,921
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#502 » by humanrefutation » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:33 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:But I'm not sure this necessarily helps Braun's image all that much. Unless they can somehow prove that the chemistry of his sample was physically altered by being in the refrigerator of the collection person, which is possible. Or they could claim the collection agent spiked the test to wrongly impugn Braun. But both of those will have harder audiences.


Those who criticize Braun despite his exoneration simply don't understand the severe limitations on his ability to exonerate himself.

-The burden was on him, not on the MLB.
-It was strict liability, which means that even if he unknowingly ingested something, he'd still lose.
-It's very, very, very hard, if not impossible, to prove that you didn't take something when the test shows otherwise.
-The only things he really could challenge were the process. Where proper procedures followed? Amongst those procedures is chain-of-custody. AFAIK, that is what he chose to attack simply because it was one of the few elements that he could dispositively prove wasn't followed in accordance with the expectations of the program.

He chose this strategy out of need, not convenience. That doesn't mean he didn't take anything, but his argument satisfied an arbiter that has never voted in favor of the player. That means a lot to me, IMO.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#503 » by WEFFPIM » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:35 pm

trwi7 wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:Here is the key part of this.....I'm not sure how many other guys had their samples handled this way.

".....According to one of the sources, the collector, after getting Braun's sample, was supposed to take the sample to FedEx/Kinkos for shipping but thought it was closed because it was late on a Saturday. As has occurred in some other instances, the collector took the sample home and kept it refrigerated. Policy states that the sample is supposed to get to FedEx as soon as possible.


I think there has to be more to it than this. I don't think Das sides with Braun if this is all there is.


I also don't think Braun attacks this so strongly if he actually cheated.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
Touchpass
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,262
And1: 310
Joined: Apr 16, 2011
Location: Blow it up.

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#504 » by Touchpass » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:41 pm

This is awesome and hopefully we have a good season. It does suck that it's being sold as overturned because a guy left the sample in a fridge over the weekend. As long as he doesn't miss time is all I care about, but I think a lot of people in the game are going to think he got off because of a loophole. There has to be more to it that just won't be reported, possibly medically related. The fail test never should have been made public, such a big **** up.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,296
And1: 57,294
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#505 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:42 pm

My question is (and it will never be answered), who tampered with it? After all it DID test positive. Does the guy who takes it to FedEx know who's sample it is? Is it just a number code on it? Hell you give the package to some dumb Kinko's clerk until the truck comes, it could be tampered with there. Is there some kind of tamper proof seal on it?
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,528
And1: 7,027
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#506 » by Siefer » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:46 pm

WEFFPIM wrote:
I also don't think Braun attacks this so strongly if he actually cheated.


That's a bit of speculative psychology that I'm unwilling to commit to. I can't say I'm stunned after the massive delay we experienced with the appeal, but it's still welcome news indeed. This is about as good of an outcome as Braun and Brewers fans can hope for. There will most likely be a shadow over Braun for the near future - a procedural flaw doesn't mean he didn't actually cheat - but, he at least now has a chance to clean up his reputation moving forward.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,638
And1: 11,636
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#507 » by Turk Nowitzki » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:47 pm

This is insane. I'm so happy right now.

Kruk being a **** moron on ESPN as per usual, making snap judgements. I agree with twirlz that Braun had to have a more extensive case that some guy not delivering the sample on time. There have to at least have been some sketchy circumstances that they obviously scientifically proved could've affected the results of the test.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,398
And1: 17,254
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#508 » by JayMKE » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:49 pm

Buster Olney getting blasted on twitter
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,331
And1: 27,990
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#509 » by trwi7 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:52 pm

I hope Braun declines every ESPN interview request from now on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,638
And1: 11,636
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#510 » by Turk Nowitzki » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:54 pm

JayMKE wrote:Buster Olney getting blasted on twitter

The one he posted where a player says the following is (Please Use More Appropriate Word):
re: Braun precedent:"If I'm one of those 14 guys who lost a previous appeal, I'm going back to try to get my named cleared."

They had their chances to appeal. You can't apply details of a specific case to all cases. Don't post stupid stuff Buster.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,212
And1: 4,594
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#511 » by BUCKnation » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:56 pm

Ill wait to hear everything. Like others have said, im sure there is more to it than the sample wasnt shipped on time. There has to something wrong with the test from the start or something of that sort.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,212
And1: 4,594
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#512 » by BUCKnation » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:58 pm

JayMKE wrote:Buster Olney getting blasted on twitter

haha, just saw you get a reply from him
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#513 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:59 pm

I don't think you guys understand how important the chain of custody is. That alone is enough to win an appeal.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,638
And1: 11,636
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#514 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:06 am

Somebody posted this on BF.net which is huge for me personally. I wanted to see some evidence that the chain of custody can disrupt the science in Braun's case and this guy seems legit:

IIRC all of these tests are run on a mass spectrometer. You can easily have metabolic/degradation of other molecules in the sample that would overlap with the position where Testosterone is supposed to be located. In this example they were using an unusual T:E ratio indicating an issue. T and E degrade at different rates. A sample could easily show a dramatic altering of the T:E ratio depending on how it was handled in a short period of time. I work with DNA all the time and it is pretty stable under varied conditions, but proteins and other small molecules can degrade within minutes under the wrong circumstances. Chain of command is definitely an issue.

How they even tested the sample is beyond me. Clearly they need to change the policy that any sample that is not sent within X hours of collection will not be tested because it has been compromised by handling.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,210
And1: 9,789
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#515 » by crkone » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:10 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Somebody posted this on BF.net which is huge for me personally. I wanted to see some evidence that the chain of custody can disrupt the science and this guy seems legit:

IIRC all of these tests are run on a mass spectrometer. You can easily have metabolic/degradation of other molecules in the sample that would overlap with the position where Testosterone is supposed to be located. In this example they were using an unusual T:E ratio indicating an issue. T and E degrade at different rates. A sample could easily show a dramatic altering of the T:E ratio depending on how it was handled in a short period of time. I work with DNA all the time and it is pretty stable under varied conditions, but proteins and other small molecules can degrade within minutes under the wrong circumstances. Chain of command is definitely an issue.

How they even tested the sample is beyond me. Clearly they need to change the policy that any sample that is not sent within X hours of collection will not be tested because it has been compromised by handling.


Makes total sense if they use a mass spec. The guy could have left the piss in his car for two days.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,940
And1: 18,293
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#516 » by RiotPunch » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:16 am

**** AWESOME NEWS!!!! SO **** HAPPY!!!!

Also, ESPN:
Image
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,698
And1: 4,487
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#517 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:17 am

Buster Olney ‏ @Buster_ESPN · Open
@AndyMonfre @HelloKittysBf Key word: 'Offer.' And as I wrote, knowing that Writers wouldn't take it back. It was a suggested PR track.
12m Andy Monfre ‏ @AndyMonfre · Open
@Buster_ESPN How would this have been good PR? "NL MVP Braun Offers to Give Back MVP, A Move That Likely Suggests Guilt"
9m Buster Olney ‏ @Buster_ESPN · Open
@AndyMonfre To me,he would have appeared magnanimous,with the best interests of baseball at heart. But I never wrote he should give it back.
7m Andy Monfre ‏ @AndyMonfre · Open
@Buster_ESPN If you were accused of plagarism, would you give back your AP award before your trial (knowing you were innocent) for PR sake?
Buster Olney ‏ @Buster_ESPN Close
@AndyMonfre Difficult to answer without specifics,but getting ahead of worst possible outcome is standard operating procedure in politics.
Hide conversation
6:13 PM - 23 Feb 12 via web · Details
Reply Retweet Favorite



Only got owned here.

"Difficult to answer without specifics." Yeah, you wouldn't do it either, you idiot. Basically admits guilt in the public eye.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,626
And1: 42,748
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#518 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:18 am

As others have said, chain of custody isssue is huge. But you'll have ESPN blowhards assume guilt anyway.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,698
And1: 4,487
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#519 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:19 am

I think Olney has been commissioned by ESPN to have people sign up for insider. He's having this war (or some random PR intern) and telling people to read the article.

The article is an insider article.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 36,052
And1: 11,957
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Braun tests positive for PED | WON APPEAL (page 30) 

Post#520 » by MikeIsGood » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:30 am

Had a helluva long day and a crazy week, and then I see this news. AWESOME! **** YOU ESPN! Unfortunately, even winning the appeal, he will always have "lost" in this mess.

Return to Milwaukee Brewers