2017 Playoffs Discussion
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
2017 Playoffs Discussion
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,459
- And1: 4,422
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
2017 Playoffs Discussion
Twins are huge underdogs tonight. One game against Severino and then the Yankees bullpen may be as daunting of a task as you can get for 1 game.
I'd be okay with almost anyone winning it all except for probably the Cubs. I don't even disdain the Yankees as much as I used to (though they're probably 2nd on teams I'd prefer not to win).
I'd be okay with almost anyone winning it all except for probably the Cubs. I don't even disdain the Yankees as much as I used to (though they're probably 2nd on teams I'd prefer not to win).
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,931
- And1: 7,314
- Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
I don't hate the Cubs. They seem like a pretty cool group of guys for the most part. Arrieta is a jag but Bryant and Rizzo are two of my favorite players in baseball. I'm okay with the Yankees because they built it up the same way every other team has to do. Mostly I just don't want the Rockies or Twins to win because they didn't really earn a playoff series.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- Iheartfootball
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,583
- And1: 5,519
- Joined: May 09, 2014
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
coolhandluke121 wrote:I don't hate the Cubs. They seem like a pretty cool group of guys for the most part. Arrieta is a jag but Bryant and Rizzo are two of my favorite players in baseball. I'm okay with the Yankees because they built it up the same way every other team has to do. Mostly I just don't want the Rockies or Twins to win because they didn't really earn a playoff series.
I generally am in the same boat on the Cubs. Hate the fans and Lackey. Rest of the team and Maddon seem fine.
I'm all in on Cleveland this year. Just like last year.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,459
- And1: 4,422
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Sure, I don't dislike any of the Cubs and I am not actively rooting hard against them now that they've broken the seal.
But, I mean, is there much else to dislike in the playoffs? Mostly big markets but nothing too hateable there and the Cubs are one of those big markets. So, it's like Cleveland, Colorado, Minnesota, Arizona that I'm slightly leaning towards and everyone else is not very hateable bigger market teams, which, the Cubs are still the division rival so they win out by default as to whom I don't want to win (again). It isn't at the level of a Bears or Vikings in the Super Bowl, but they win out as the team I like the least in a sea of other teams that leave me ambivalent.
But, I mean, is there much else to dislike in the playoffs? Mostly big markets but nothing too hateable there and the Cubs are one of those big markets. So, it's like Cleveland, Colorado, Minnesota, Arizona that I'm slightly leaning towards and everyone else is not very hateable bigger market teams, which, the Cubs are still the division rival so they win out by default as to whom I don't want to win (again). It isn't at the level of a Bears or Vikings in the Super Bowl, but they win out as the team I like the least in a sea of other teams that leave me ambivalent.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,535
- And1: 54,785
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
I guess I'll root for the Nats and Twins. I don't really give a **** though.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,762
- And1: 1,060
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
It'll Be Red Sox and Nats for me.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Go Twins.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,675
- And1: 27,265
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Indians
Nationals
Astros
Twins
Diamondbacks
Rockies
Dodgers
Red Sox
Yankees
Cubs
Nationals
Astros
Twins
Diamondbacks
Rockies
Dodgers
Red Sox
Yankees
Cubs
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- tski1972
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,291
- And1: 3,760
- Joined: May 24, 2011
- Location: Wow-saw, WI
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
I'll go Astros and D-Backs......D-Backs in 6.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- blazza18
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,333
- And1: 29,276
- Joined: Dec 02, 2010
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Astros vs Dodgers/Nats is what I am hoping for.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,335
- And1: 4,144
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Anyone in the AL bar the red sox/yankees and then probably AZ or Colorado in the NL
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Hell yes. Nothing would make me happier in these playoffs than the Yankees (actually the Sox) losing hard.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,535
- And1: 54,785
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Never expected this
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,426
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Sep 09, 2013
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
Santana doing his best Garza impersonation.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,274
- And1: 7,915
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
And so begins the most stupid tradition in sports. The champagne locker room party after winning 1 wild card game.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,535
- And1: 54,785
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
This is what really makes me laugh, wearing protective glasses like the Twins did. Man up for God's sake. The Twins aren't the only one's to wear glasses of course. Here's an interesting article from a couple of years ago on the champagne thing.
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/bubblys-evolution-traditional-champagne-celebrations-baseball/story?id=34648353

http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/bubblys-evolution-traditional-champagne-celebrations-baseball/story?id=34648353

I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
ReasonablySober wrote:Hell yes. Nothing would make me happier in these playoffs than the Yankees (actually the Sox) losing hard.
I'm with you, just want to see Boston and NY lose.
Would like to see Houston win it all after all that city has been through.
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Playoffs Discussion
MickeyDavis wrote:This is what really makes me laugh, wearing protective glasses like the Twins did. Man up for God's sake. The Twins aren't the only one's to wear glasses of course. Here's an interesting article from a couple of years ago on the champagne thing.
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/bubblys-evolution-traditional-champagne-celebrations-baseball/story?id=34648353
So if you were a professional athlete you'd risk **** your eyes up because you got alcohol in them?