Re: 2020-21 Brewers Offseason Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 4, 2020 10:58 pm
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=110&t=2003466
MickeyDavis wrote:
At a spring training game a couple years back he ripped a fart that I could hear from the stands and sent the pitchers scurrying away.MickeyDavis wrote:
leroyjw10 wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:
I can't believe the hitting coach remained after last season. This is reminiscent of hanging on to Pettine even though it's clear he's a problem.
M-C-G wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:
I think most teams are going to be very cheap this offseason. I'm sure it's going to make them look cheap and might very well cost them, but I'm assuming this is their justification that they can try to get him or a similar caliber player cheaper.
Yeah, not a real surprise, owners probably lost quite a bit last year, and now this year too many unknowns. Might be a lot of FA this offseason sitting around right up until before the next season starts up.
ReasonablySober wrote:Williams wins ROY. That rules.
DrWood wrote:M-C-G wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:
I think most teams are going to be very cheap this offseason. I'm sure it's going to make them look cheap and might very well cost them, but I'm assuming this is their justification that they can try to get him or a similar caliber player cheaper.
Yeah, not a real surprise, owners probably lost quite a bit last year, and now this year too many unknowns. Might be a lot of FA this offseason sitting around right up until before the next season starts up.
but Gyorko is one of the few hitters who produced this season. $4.5 million isn't excessive.
DrWood wrote:M-C-G wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:
I think most teams are going to be very cheap this offseason. I'm sure it's going to make them look cheap and might very well cost them, but I'm assuming this is their justification that they can try to get him or a similar caliber player cheaper.
Yeah, not a real surprise, owners probably lost quite a bit last year, and now this year too many unknowns. Might be a lot of FA this offseason sitting around right up until before the next season starts up.
but Gyorko is one of the few hitters who produced this season. $4.5 million isn't excessive.
Kerb Hohl wrote:DrWood wrote:M-C-G wrote:
Yeah, not a real surprise, owners probably lost quite a bit last year, and now this year too many unknowns. Might be a lot of FA this offseason sitting around right up until before the next season starts up.
but Gyorko is one of the few hitters who produced this season. $4.5 million isn't excessive.
We've seen in all of these guys' careers that they are all very up-and-down and in theory replaceable. That's the reason that Gyorko was available for cheap (by pre-2020 season standards). He was terrible in 60 games in 2019 and so-so in 2018 after being a solid/good hitter for most of the years before that.
So I guess management's idea, while not to defend them because they're being cheap but also to defend them based on that...they could easily be overpaying him based on a hot 60 games last year. What if they get 2019 Gyorko?
I mean I would think they can/should just pay him, but I guess the idea would be that they can just find someone under-the-radar like Gyorko was for cheaper. If they have a gaping hole there, of course they can/should be flamed for it.
DrWood wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:DrWood wrote:but Gyorko is one of the few hitters who produced this season. $4.5 million isn't excessive.
We've seen in all of these guys' careers that they are all very up-and-down and in theory replaceable. That's the reason that Gyorko was available for cheap (by pre-2020 season standards). He was terrible in 60 games in 2019 and so-so in 2018 after being a solid/good hitter for most of the years before that.
So I guess management's idea, while not to defend them because they're being cheap but also to defend them based on that...they could easily be overpaying him based on a hot 60 games last year. What if they get 2019 Gyorko?
I mean I would think they can/should just pay him, but I guess the idea would be that they can just find someone under-the-radar like Gyorko was for cheaper. If they have a gaping hole there, of course they can/should be flamed for it.
How much cheaper can they get for a guy who hit fine and has positional flexibility?
Kerb Hohl wrote:DrWood wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:
We've seen in all of these guys' careers that they are all very up-and-down and in theory replaceable. That's the reason that Gyorko was available for cheap (by pre-2020 season standards). He was terrible in 60 games in 2019 and so-so in 2018 after being a solid/good hitter for most of the years before that.
So I guess management's idea, while not to defend them because they're being cheap but also to defend them based on that...they could easily be overpaying him based on a hot 60 games last year. What if they get 2019 Gyorko?
I mean I would think they can/should just pay him, but I guess the idea would be that they can just find someone under-the-radar like Gyorko was for cheaper. If they have a gaping hole there, of course they can/should be flamed for it.
How much cheaper can they get for a guy who hit fine and has positional flexibility?
If all of the owners are colluding (and do have somewhat of a gripe of lost revenue, though of course they can afford to eat said loss), I bet a guy like Gyorko goes for $2 or $3 million next year.
leroyjw10 wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:
I can't believe the hitting coach remained after last season. This is reminiscent of hanging on to Pettine even though it's clear he's a problem.
WeekapaugGroove wrote:At a spring training game a couple years back he ripped a fart that I could hear from the stands and sent the pitchers scurrying away.MickeyDavis wrote:
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
ReasonablySober wrote: