Page 1 of 2
Slumping Brewers try to regroup vs. D-backs
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:42 pm
by Ayt
I realize this isn't much of a thread, but WTF? This is a link on the front page of ESPN.com.
What a slump. We had won four of our last five coming into today. If that is slumping, lets slump the rest of the year.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:44 pm
by Nowak008
Tiger is on the front page for me.
wait now i see it.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:12 pm
by goirish2107
yeah i put this in the game thread. initially it said struggling, then switched to slumping. i don't know what brewers they're talking about. although maybe they expected us to play .700 ball all year.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:24 pm
by JoeJohnson2two
They said slumping because coming in to today's game we were 29-31 after our 24-10 start.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:41 pm
by Ayt
JoeJohnson2two wrote:They said slumping because coming in to today's game we were 29-31 after our 24-10 start.
Pretty odd timing considering how we've played recently.
"Slumping Brewers -- who own the best record in the NL -- try to break out of their slump, having won 4 of their last 5."
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:43 pm
by JoeJohnson2two
Ayt wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Pretty odd timing considering how we've played recently.
"Slumping Brewers -- who own the best record in the NL -- try to break out of their slump, having won 4 of their last 5."
Yeah, I agree but I was just trying to put some reasoning behind why they said "slumping". 5-2 since the all-star break isn't slumping last time I looked...
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:47 pm
by brewcityboii
19-11 in our last 30.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:00 pm
by Ayt
brewcityboii wrote:19-11 in our last 30.
Slump.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:04 pm
by brewcityboii
Ayt wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Slump.
Yeah go figure .600+ ball is a slump
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:06 pm
by WEFFPIM
Slump slump slump
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:07 pm
by brewcityboii
A STRUGGLING SLUMP
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:08 pm
by livestrong4ever
Hey look at the positive side, they have really high standards for Milwaukee.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:45 pm
by WEFFPIM
livestrong4ever wrote:Hey look at the positive side, they have really high standards for Milwaukee.
Those slumping bastards
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:44 am
by JoeWolfFan
Karl Ravech on Baseball Tonight said, "Fans in Milwaukee will need something to cheer about since the Brewers are fading fast." Dusty Baker quickly jumped in and said, "They won 10 to 1 tonight."
Ahh the good ol' Eastern Seaboard Propaganda Network (ESPN).
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:13 am
by Siefer
JoeWolfFan wrote:Karl Ravech on Baseball Tonight said, "Fans in Milwaukee will need something to cheer about since the Brewers are fading fast." Dusty Baker quickly jumped in and said, "They won 10 to 1 tonight."
Ahh the good ol' Eastern Seaboard Propaganda Network (ESPN).
Is that seriously a real quote?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:23 am
by JoeJohnson2two
That's really laughable seeing as we are better than the Mets and Dodgers. Oh wait. We are better than the whole National League.
My god. Can you say World Series run if we get home field throughout the NLDS and NLCS? We are the best home team in all of baseball right now.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:43 am
by JoeWolfFan
Siefer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Is that seriously a real quote?
Yes it is. They were talking about Bonds coming to Milwaukee and potentially breaking the record. That's when he said the "the fans will need something to cheer about" quote. I emailed them saying Ravech should get his facts straight before going on tv.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:06 pm
by Ayt
I hate having the most wins in the NL. I really need something to cheer about.
I'm also pissed about only winning 5 of our last 6. ****.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:42 pm
by brewcityboii
Stupid Slumping Brewers....
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:39 pm
by JoeJohnson2two
Apparently we are struggling in the eyes of ESPN. The Padres, Dodgers, and Cubs remain ahead of us in the Power Rankings.
Last I looked but don't we have the best record AND biggest division lead in the National League? How are we not considered the best team in the NL? Cuz the Padres have 2 pitchers? Cuz the Dodgers have dominant pitching but horrible offense? Cuz the Cubs have beaten up on last place teams the last week?
Someone please explain it to me...