Page 1 of 2
Chicago Scrubs Vs. San Francisco Giants 3 game series
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:36 pm
by brewcityboii
8/21 9:15pm CDT Game 1:
Jason Marquis 10-7 4.25 ERA
Vs.
Tim Lincecum 7-3 3.95 ERA
8/22 9:15pm CDT Game 2:
Rich Hill 7-7 3.73 ERA
Vs.
Barry "big bucks" Zito
9-11 4.88ERA
8/23 2:35 CDT Game 3:
Sean Marshall 6-6 4.21ERA
Vs.
Matt Cain 5-13 3.78ERA
Game Notes:

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:35 am
by WEFFPIM
You people suck at keeping these up-to-date.
1-0 Giants
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:15 am
by SportsWorld
Cubs tied it up in the 9th.
2 runners on with 0 outs.
Lincecum is out of the game.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:15 am
by ACGB
GOD **** DAMMIT
GIANTS SUCK DICK
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:17 am
by Buck You
Giants are the definition of horrible.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:20 am
by IbreakNeckZ101
I think we got lucky.. lincecum had his stuff tonight...
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:23 am
by Buck You
IbreakNeckZ101 wrote:I think we got lucky.. lincecum had his stuff tonight...
It's just that the Giants are horrible. Bad teams find ways to lose.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:23 am
by SportsWorld
Lincecum is one hell of a pitcher.
He just lost control in the 9th.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:33 am
by IbreakNeckZ101
SportsWorld wrote:Lincecum is one hell of a pitcher.
He just lost control in the 9th.
he's one hell of a pitcher.. good luck against him Milwaukee.. not too much luck though.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:00 am
by ReasonablySober
It's too bad that baseball hasn't yet come up with someone to finish games. To 'close' them, if you will. Someone to replace a starter or reliever in the 9th inning of a close game. Someone like that would have come in handy tonight for the Giants.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:03 am
by Buck You
DrugBust wrote:It's too bad that baseball hasn't yet come up with someone to finish games. To 'close' them, if you will. Someone to replace a starter or reliever in the 9th inning of a close game. Someone like that would have come in handy tonight for the Giants.
You mean a closer? A pitcher that every team has?
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:04 am
by WEFFPIM
ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:You mean a closer? A pitcher that every team has?
I guess you need the green font to figure out sarcasm
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:05 am
by Buck You
willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I guess you need the green font to figure out sarcasm
Well.. it's hard to figure out sarcasm on the internet. But it didn't sound like he was being sarcastic.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:07 am
by WEFFPIM
ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:Well.. it's hard to figure out sarcasm on the internet. But it didn't sound like he was being sarcastic.
I guess I have a knack for it. Or, I noticed this part:
To 'close' them, if you will.
Notice the ''
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:12 am
by Buck You
willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Notice the ''
Eh.. I still don't know. But you are probably right.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:13 am
by ReasonablySober
ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well.. it's hard to figure out sarcasm on the internet. But it didn't sound like he was being sarcastic.
It's not that hard.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:14 am
by Buck You
DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's not that hard.
Oh whatever. I fail in this thread.
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:25 am
by WEFFPIM
ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:Oh whatever. I fail in this thread.

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:39 am
by trwi7
DrugBust wrote:It's not that hard.
Is this sarcasm?ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:Oh whatever. I fail in this thread.

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 6:01 am
by Buck You