Another year gone by another year filled with mixed emotions regarding our OF's. There is a lot of talks about Minaya wanting to make a splash for a impact player, which means one of these players are going to have to be traded. We have seen a little more of Lastings starting to put it together, we have seen Gomez blaze around the base path and Martinez sit because of an injury.
However which one of these players are you more inclined to include in a trade?
Lastings l Gomez l Martinez
Lastings l Gomez l Martinez
-
Manhattan Project
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,524
- And1: 8,218
- Joined: Feb 23, 2005
- Location: The game ain't in me no more. None of it.
Lastings l Gomez l Martinez
Jazz: Under reconstruction, we'll be back.
C- Maluach l Jackson l Hayes
PF- Okongwu l Newell l Salaun
SF- Wiggins l Bryant l McNeeley
SG- Thomas l Wallace l Nembhard
PG- Murray l Collier l Dillingham
C- Maluach l Jackson l Hayes
PF- Okongwu l Newell l Salaun
SF- Wiggins l Bryant l McNeeley
SG- Thomas l Wallace l Nembhard
PG- Murray l Collier l Dillingham
-
Luv those Knicks
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,573
- And1: 5,852
- Joined: Jul 21, 2001
- Location: East of West and West of East.
- Contact:
Martinez is perhaps the guy with the most potential, so he's the one I'd least want to trade.
So that leaves Milledge or Gomez.
I'd rather keep Milledge. I like his fire and I like what I've seen in him.
With Reyes & Castillo, we're kind of set at the 1/2 spots in the batting order - which would be Gomez' natural spot if he turns into a starter,
I'd trade Gomez, then millege, then Martinez - in that order.
So that leaves Milledge or Gomez.
I'd rather keep Milledge. I like his fire and I like what I've seen in him.
With Reyes & Castillo, we're kind of set at the 1/2 spots in the batting order - which would be Gomez' natural spot if he turns into a starter,
I'd trade Gomez, then millege, then Martinez - in that order.
Bill Clinton slept with an intern. A consenting adult and he got impeached and nearly disbarred as a result. Donald Trump went to parties showcasing underaged women brought in as basically prostitutes, and he says it's nothing.
Double standard?
Double standard?