Page 1 of 2
Wright and Reyes don't deserve starting in All-Star Game
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:20 am
by OoAnd1
Bold indicates who has better stats....
Cabrera: .324, 18HR, 61RBI, 52R
Wright: .292, 16HR, 51RBI, 49R
Hanley: .331, 14HR, 35RBI, 70R
Reyes: .307, 4HR, 35RBI, 62R
It's a joke. It's not Reyes' or Wright's fault.....hopefully they enjoy it. But it's MLB's fault for letting dumb fans choose who are the better players when the numbers are so clear-cut.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:12 am
by vincanityisdagr8est
Benefits of playing in New York.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:16 am
by holdupstop23
Reyes would have a better average and more runs if his teammates didnt suck.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:26 am
by mets87
cabrera definitely, hanley, no. and can we please stop using crappy stats to judge a player's performance
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:35 am
by vincanityisdagr8est
no, Hanley's been good. If he didnt get picked by the fans, I dont think he would've been selected to the team. Ramirez, Rentaria, Rollins are having better years than Reyes.
Wow all the SS's last name initial begins with R.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:46 am
by mets87
who said hanley hasn't been good...?
and lmao @ rollins. yeah, he and his .329 OBP are fantastic. his OPS is 20 points higher than reyes', which at this point in the season is almost negligible.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:35 am
by bringinhinkie
Re: Wright and Reyes don't deserve starting in All-Star Game
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:06 pm
by Lord Commander
OoAnd1 wrote:Bold indicates who has better stats....
Cabrera: .324, 18HR, 61RBI, 52R
Wright: .292, 16HR, 51RBI, 49R
Hanley: .331, 14HR, 35RBI, 70R
Reyes: .307, 4HR, 35RBI, 62R
It's a joke. It's not Reyes' or Wright's fault.....hopefully they enjoy it. But it's MLB's fault for letting dumb fans choose who are the better players when the numbers are so clear-cut.
Wouldn't have expected anything else out of you...

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:29 pm
by Jose7
Cabrera desereves to start, Reyes has been the best shortstop in baseball. He has been on a little skid that's why his BA is down but think about when the voting was casted, he was batting over .320
Too bad there are only 5 marlin fans in the world... I'll continue to vote for every met, every year.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:26 pm
by mets87
quoting rbi and home runs for a leadoff hitter...sigh...well quoting rbi and runs at all makes your argument suck automatically, so whatever
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:17 pm
by cmaff051
mets87 wrote:quoting rbi and home runs for a leadoff hitter...sigh...well quoting rbi and runs at all makes your argument suck automatically, so whatever
With RBIs, you have a point.
But HRs? Come on. Hanley Ramirez is a leadoff hitter too.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:21 pm
by vincanityisdagr8est
Look at Reyes' numbers has a whole and compare it with the other SS. Reyes was batting .361 as late as may 4th. Since then he was gone 58/239, a .243 batting average. His OBP has gone from .439 to .387 in that stretch. Since the 15th of May he has had 9 extra base hits.
Rollins however has been consistant throughout the year, he has batted around late .270s to late .280s. The guy has 22 doubles 10 triples 16 hrs, 53 rbis and 71 runs scored for a leadoff hitter.
Reyes is my favorite player, but I always give credit where credit is due. Reyes was spectacular in the last night, and I'll admit i did vote for him about 100 times. But he has been a dissappointment as of late. With the type of start he had to the season, I was expecting a lot from him.
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:54 pm
by Manhattan Project
Best part about it, it will be like this for the next five years at least barring injury. Get used to it...
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:09 pm
by mets87
he can't be amazing all year...everybody goes through slumps...give it a rest... and for god's sake, stop quoting rbi's and runs, as they are almost completely dependent on the other people on the team
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:18 pm
by gooGD
arguments can be made from both sides.
but guess what, it doesnt really matter. if you play in a bigger market, you're going to get more votes for certain players.
Allstar "game" is nothing more than an exhibition game.
Re: Wright and Reyes don't deserve starting in All-Star Game
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:25 am
by OoAnd1
Glad to see the majority agree that Cabrera should have started. It's obvious that Cabrera is the better player.
Regarding Reyes vs. Hanley....I can't use power numbers? It doesn't matter where they hit...power numbers means runs scored...scoring runs is the bottom line for a lineup. If Reyes gets a double, steals third and then scores from a sacrifice out...that's better than Hanley just hitting a homerun? Small ball and long ball are BOTH important and Hanley does both. You want more specific lead-off stats? Fine...
Hanley:
.331Avg,
.388OBP,
117Hits,
14HR, 35RBI,
70R,
23Dbls, 4Tripl, 28BB, 27SB
Reyes: .307Avg, .387OBP, 110Hits, 4HR, 35RBI, 62R, 17Dbls,
9Tripl,
47BB,
46SB
Reyes is the better lead-off hitter. Hanley is the better ballplayer. Hanley is just a bigger threat...one night he's batting lead-off..robbing bases and starting big innings....the next night he's batting 3rd....knocking in runs and capping big innings. He has potential to get a 40/40 one year in the near future.

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:55 am
by Jose7
Shut up already. Jose Reyes is the best SS in the game, no doubt about it. When you consider his defense as well as his impact on the game, it's not even close. This is the same guy that people said wouldnt be able to draw 20 walks in a seaosn, he's on pace for 80.
Re: Wright and Reyes don't deserve starting in All-Star Game
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:06 am
by eviL
OoAnd1 wrote:Bold indicates who has better stats....
Cabrera: .324, 18HR, 61RBI, 52R
Wright: .292, 16HR, 51RBI, 49R
Hanley: .331, 14HR, 35RBI, 70R
Reyes: .307, 4HR, 35RBI, 62R
It's a joke. It's not Reyes' or Wright's fault.....hopefully they enjoy it. But it's MLB's fault for letting dumb fans choose who are the better players when the numbers are so clear-cut.
Don't even try to compare Reyes to Hanley statwise.. Let's face it, no one is more fun to watch in a game than Jose Reyes, and that, imo, is good enough to get him the start.
It didn't hurt that he went 3-4 with a run and a SB either.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:25 am
by mjhp911
Pfft. Reyes went 3 for 4 in the game, with a run scored, a stolen base, and a two-bagger. Hanley would have wiffed twice.
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:54 pm
by mets87
see, you're doing it again. i do not give a **** how many runs someone scores or drives in. it is completely dependent on the rest of the lineup.
ugh