Lawrence gone??? (John Delcos)
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:03 pm
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:06 pm
he seems like a good guy, but it just hasnt worked out. the problem is that he couldnt get any of his breaking stuff called for strikes consistently.
when he has a 6 era, how can you not go with guys like pelfrey or humber who are bound to be around 6 or under? we've seen this cat's act- we know what he can do, but pelfrey and humber cant be worse than a 6era.
if this means pelfrey or humber gets another shot im all for it, they cant be much worse than what lawrence has given us each start.
when he has a 6 era, how can you not go with guys like pelfrey or humber who are bound to be around 6 or under? we've seen this cat's act- we know what he can do, but pelfrey and humber cant be worse than a 6era.
if this means pelfrey or humber gets another shot im all for it, they cant be much worse than what lawrence has given us each start.
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:33 pm
real nice guy seems like. but it's common sense to send him down or release him. to make room for endy...
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 3:58 pm
Just for the record, I thougth Lawrence pitched adequitly. He gave us a chance to win every game. Didn't pitch well, but for a call up / 5th starter, he did OK. He never gave up so many runs that we were out of it. I can live with what he did.
but, I'm glad Pelf is in the rotation now over Lawrence.
but, I'm glad Pelf is in the rotation now over Lawrence.
Posted: Sun Sep 2, 2007 4:37 pm
He was the equivalent of Traschel really, pitched decent enough to keep us in the game but no one liked him. I doubt there is anyone here that wanted him over the likes of Pelfrey or Humber really.