ImageImageImageImageImage

Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading

Moderator: nykgeneralmanager

Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,838
And1: 19,323
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#41 » by Pharmcat » Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:12 am

:onfire: :onfire: :onfire: :onfire: :onfire:
Image
Dr. Detfink
RealGM
Posts: 18,889
And1: 4,552
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#42 » by Dr. Detfink » Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:50 am

What an important win by the Yanks. The stats don't tell the whole story. Joba pitched with poise and confidence. This is very good litmus acid test. The Yanks rebounded after a flat performance last night. They were rewarded by a Boston loss.

If I the Blue Jays offered Halladay for Joba and Austin Jackson, I would still bite but it would now make me think about it before hitting the button.

The 4 game set vs. the White Sox should be very interesting. Pettitte, Mitre, AJ, CC...another very fun challenge.
User avatar
nykgeneralmanager
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,172
And1: 306
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#43 » by nykgeneralmanager » Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:05 am

The White Sox series will definitely be interesting. They will be throwing 3 lefties which usually works in our favor.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#44 » by PR07 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:59 am

When Joba pitches like a bulldog, he can be incredible. We saw that tonight.
User avatar
rappa
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,251
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 30, 2004

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#45 » by rappa » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:13 pm

hmm so Dr. Deftnik can you admit that you just have a hardon for all redsox prospects and underappreciate your own teams? hell just admit you were wrong about bucholz and masterson. btw, have you even looked at the lineup buchholtz faced that night he threw the no hitter? please do and then tell me how much you think that no hitter means these days
Image
User avatar
nykgeneralmanager
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,172
And1: 306
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#46 » by nykgeneralmanager » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:06 pm

I'd also love to know why the world has a hard on for Bard. Good prospect, but he's a reliever, he hasn't started since he was in A ball when he had a 6.42 ERA in low-A and 10.13 ERA in high-A as a starter then he was converted into a reliever. Yet he gets talked about as a main piece in a package whereas a guy like Melancon or even Robertson have just as good of numbers if not better but seem to be afterthoughts. I'm not mad, I want to keep these guys and win with them, but its hilarious to hear that guys like Clay Buchholz or Daniel Bard are deal breakers for Roy Halladay.
HCYanks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,427
And1: 2
Joined: May 24, 2002

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#47 » by HCYanks » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:27 pm

I think the justification for the Red Sox not wanting to move Bard is Papelbon has gotten damned lucky in a lot of appearances this year and it might be more sensible to ship him elsewhere before he starts to get expensive and plug Bard in at closer in the next 1-2 years. The Sox may act a tad cocky with their prospects at times but I doubt Epstein is really dense enough to think Bard is some kind of superprospect.
Dr. Detfink
RealGM
Posts: 18,889
And1: 4,552
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#48 » by Dr. Detfink » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:15 am

Well, not only that but more importantly Papelbon is starting to buy the "best closer in MLB" crap that Buster Olney has been saying over the last couple years. He wants BIG $$$$$$ and the Sox just won't do that for a closer. Hence, Bard will replace Papelbon when the time comes.
User avatar
nykgeneralmanager
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,172
And1: 306
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Yanks @ Rays: A more accurate barometer reading 

Post#49 » by nykgeneralmanager » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:27 am

HCYanks wrote:I think the justification for the Red Sox not wanting to move Bard is Papelbon has gotten damned lucky in a lot of appearances this year and it might be more sensible to ship him elsewhere before he starts to get expensive and plug Bard in at closer in the next 1-2 years. The Sox may act a tad cocky with their prospects at times but I doubt Epstein is really dense enough to think Bard is some kind of superprospect.

Yeah I don't disagree with Boston for wanting to keep him, just the general perception from the media and fans that "OMG the Sox can't include Bard in the Halladay deal!"

Return to New York Yankees