ImageImageImageImageImage

o/t gio dealt to washington

Moderator: nykgeneralmanager

Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,838
And1: 19,323
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

o/t gio dealt to washington 

Post#1 » by Pharmcat » Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:19 pm

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/73810 ... ource-says

how bout that #2 starter cash :roll:

you either pony up 4 prospects or give up 100 mil to get a starter

its that simple, there is no buying on the cheap
Image
Dr. Detfink
RealGM
Posts: 18,889
And1: 4,552
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

Re: o/t gio dealt to washington 

Post#2 » by Dr. Detfink » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:45 am

Cash would answer, "My grand design is to have a Yankee team that wins a WS without a lux tax..." unfortunately that won't happen within our life time.

As for Gio, nice pitcher but guy who is more of a #3 or 4 due to his walks.
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,838
And1: 19,323
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: o/t gio dealt to washington 

Post#3 » by Pharmcat » Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:23 pm

Dr. Detfink wrote:Cash would answer, "My grand design is to have a Yankee team that wins a WS without a lux tax..." unfortunately that won't happen within our life time.

As for Gio, nice pitcher but guy who is more of a #3 or 4 due to his walks.


im not saying i wanted gio


but its obvious yankees are in denial

the new marketplace dictates around 100 mill for FA, or 4 prospects via trade

NY hasnt accepted that yet
Image
Christophersp10
Banned User
Posts: 3,487
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: o/t gio dealt to washington 

Post#4 » by Christophersp10 » Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:20 pm

The Gio trade was far too much for my personal liking. Plus I dont trust when Billy Beane just decides to trade off players. Something is up.

That and the fact I wouldn't do a trade centered around one or both of the Killer B's for him. King Felix, yes. Gio Gonzaelez, nope.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: o/t gio dealt to washington 

Post#5 » by moocow007 » Fri Jan 6, 2012 2:46 am

Well the talk is that Cashman is not infatuated with any of this offseasons crop of starters and instead is banking the money for a run at either Cole Hamels or Matt Cain next offseason. Was on MLB Network and also mentioned on YES. Said that either guy could likely get $20 million per and that Cashman, Epstein and Ben Cherington all are believed to be zoning in on one of these guys should they reach free agency in a years time. YES group believed that Hamels would be the better choice since he's viewed as more talented and more proven pitching in Philly than Cain. YES group also agreed that David Robertson is the heir apparent to Mariano. Mentioned that Robertson was the best reliever in baseball last season (100 SO in 66 IN with a 1.80 ERA pitching in the AL East for the Yankees). Hamels has that look that I think would get him plenty of opportunities to make money beyond what the Yankees will throw at him if he were to play in NY.

Return to New York Yankees