nykgeneralmanager wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Please quote the person who said that Joba is already a better reliever than Okajima? Come on guy...
If you're going to troll, at least do it well.
hhahahahahahaah calling me a troll...
sorry if i dont subscribe to some of the koolaid you guys dispense out here on the yankees board.
you guys are nuts. you dont realize that for every 1 prospect that lives up to its hype there are 5 that dont even get to reach half their projected ceiling.
this is my point since day 1. all of you guys are so quick to name tabata, joba etc as the saviors and the next big thing. go research my posts. i tell mets fans that chances are, fmart, milledge and cargo wont be stars. we'll be lucky for 2 of them to be "great" and unbelievably lucky of all 3 are great. chances are, obviously, not all 3 will be.
you're drinking too much koolaid. dont tell me that if joba can handle the spotlight he will be dominant immediately.
this is why i said i didnt care if he hits 97 on the gun with a nasty slider and to wake me up when he has extended success against big leaguers. that is what im trying to say. dont accuse me of being the troll here.
unlike some of your posters, as i have noted before, i dont go around telling people john maine sucks, and is a career "b or c" starter. or make threads proclaiming that my prospect is the answer. you tell me who is the troll here.
Markos wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I agree with you, he spends way too much time worrying about either Boston's or the Mets's prospects and downrating them all while overhyping the Yankees. All the while both teams have legitimate ROY candidates. (Boston has 3)
it is not so much that he worries about boston or the mets- or even downrating prospects. he just posts with arrogance about how he "knows" baseball.. that is my problem. don't go around telling people john maine is nothing better than a 4th starter in the AL for about probably 30 posts only to be proved wrong over and over again. so, who is the troll?
look cmaff is more often than not right on his opinions on certain players. he might think i dont read most of his posts, but i generally dont reply to much about what is written on these boards. but when people post outlandish trades or ideas about certain people, i dont subscribe to that kind of koolaid- especially when we talk about prospects.
to sum up this thread:
i dont care how you look at it. a 1.00 era with 40+ innings is not "fringy" stuff. name me 5 better relievers at this point.
do some of you guys realize how hard it is to have those numbers? do you realize how dominant joba has to be to have those numbers? considering his age and experience only immortals have those kinds of numbers. okajimas numbers right now are untouchable- they are nuts and absolutely incredible. do you understand how much hype you are building into joba for you to insinuate that he can potentially be better than okajima's numbers? who is the troll here: someone telling you that joba can be better than 1.00 era with 40+ innings in the "mighty" AL east...
or someone who says, lets see it happen first.
the point of my post was that okajima is no slouch. he does not have fringy stuff. his era will undoubtedly go up from 1.00, its just impossible to keep doing this well- not in this era of baseball.