Is anyone else really tired of Michael Kay?
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:29 am
Yesterday he was going on and on about how Pavano should start instead of Hughes because Pavano once went 18-8 and he claims Hughes struggled his entire major league career. It's astounding to me how he doesn't know the players on games that he has called. Hughes had the great September last year, as well as the near no-hitter and the playoffs.
Then today during the broadcast he was talking about how Cano plays so poorly when they lose. When nearly every player hits better when they win(surprise). Look at this.
Player: Wins|Losses
Molina: .279 .340 .380 | .156 .182 .229
Giambi: .254 .423 .538 | .242 .345 .473
Cano: .337 .374 .520 | .181 .221 .251
Arod: .359 .450 .677 | .254 .337 .491
Jeter: .298 .357 .419 | .290 .353 .382 (9 GIDP | 10 GIDP)
Damon: .362 .417 .511 | .255 .348 .375
Melky: .257 .309 .376 | .223 .279 .286
Abreu: .338 .409 .542 | .234 .313 .376
Matsui: .368 .447 .519 | .264 .346 .380
Posada: .314 .459 .535 | .220 .238 .280
Betemit: .244 .289 .444 | .284 .294 .358
Nady: .376 .432 .688 | .223 .269 .354
IRod: .335 .384 .494 | .240 .277 .323
I left off a bunch of guys who don't have too many plate appearances. Nearly every hitter hits .100 better in wins instead of losses. Jeter, Giambi and Melky are the only consistent ones but both Melky and Giambi were consistently bad. Betemit is just weird. Granted Cano's split is bigger than the rest but .100 for nearly everyone else. I'm sure Michael Kay will be shocked to know that the pitchers have better ERAs when the team wins. -Jitpal
Then today during the broadcast he was talking about how Cano plays so poorly when they lose. When nearly every player hits better when they win(surprise). Look at this.
Player: Wins|Losses
Molina: .279 .340 .380 | .156 .182 .229
Giambi: .254 .423 .538 | .242 .345 .473
Cano: .337 .374 .520 | .181 .221 .251
Arod: .359 .450 .677 | .254 .337 .491
Jeter: .298 .357 .419 | .290 .353 .382 (9 GIDP | 10 GIDP)
Damon: .362 .417 .511 | .255 .348 .375
Melky: .257 .309 .376 | .223 .279 .286
Abreu: .338 .409 .542 | .234 .313 .376
Matsui: .368 .447 .519 | .264 .346 .380
Posada: .314 .459 .535 | .220 .238 .280
Betemit: .244 .289 .444 | .284 .294 .358
Nady: .376 .432 .688 | .223 .269 .354
IRod: .335 .384 .494 | .240 .277 .323
I left off a bunch of guys who don't have too many plate appearances. Nearly every hitter hits .100 better in wins instead of losses. Jeter, Giambi and Melky are the only consistent ones but both Melky and Giambi were consistently bad. Betemit is just weird. Granted Cano's split is bigger than the rest but .100 for nearly everyone else. I'm sure Michael Kay will be shocked to know that the pitchers have better ERAs when the team wins. -Jitpal