RealGM

if we lose 2 of 3, this season is over. its as simple as that.

TUES - Pettitte vs. Wakefield
WED - Ponson vs. Byrd
THURS - Mussina vs. Lester


No beckett or dice-k, so thats in our advantage, we just need the bats to show up!

LETS GO YANKS

Perfect way of saying it...we need two out of three (or perhaps better).

I expect Gardner to see at LEAST pinch running duties the next couple games.

I see us winning game one and three.

Our really crappy pitcher is up against their slightly less crappy pitcher, so overall the matchups for the series are pretty nice. Their lineup will also be missing J.D. Drew and Mike Lowell (at least for the first two games). Really, this is a gift series for the Yankees so let's pray to God it goes right.

It would be nice to sweep.

cmaff051 wrote:It would be nice to sweep.

[url][/url]


it would be nice, but down 3-2 to this knuckleballing trash tosser doesn't please me at all..

oh well 4-2.. you gotta be kidding me andy.. 4 runs to this bum lineup that includes guys like crisp, lowrie, bailey and cash? GEEZ!!

As if Andy wasn't breaking my balls enough, there's Giambi...

Are f-ing kidding me Giambi! -Jitpal

COME ON ANDY!!!! YOU CANT GET OUT BUMS LIKE BAILEY!!! 6-2 GEEZ.. PUT THIS GAME IN THE BOOKS.....

Jitpal wrote:Are f-ing kidding me Giambi! -Jitpal

defense is a key to winning, and ever since we got giambi from the A's our first base defense has gone downhill and has be a major hole.. Major...

how do you let andy get over 100 pitches by the 5th inning? at that point you should know he has nothing.. geez!!!

Is there a team that gets some bloopers, flares and bleeders than the Red Sox?

cmaff051 wrote:Is there a team that gets some bloopers, flares and bleeders than the Red Sox?

LOL.. Yea, the angels..

now you do know with a 6-2 lead, wakefield turns into cy young..

TKF wrote:

cmaff051 wrote:Is there a team that gets some bloopers, flares and bleeders than the Red Sox?

LOL.. Yea, the angels..

True... I forgot about them... the Red Sox are close, though...

well damon with another dinger.. can we just have him bat for everyone in the lineup...

TKF wrote:how do you let andy get over 100 pitches by the 5th inning? at that point you should know he has nothing.. geez!!!

Nothing was hit hard. They had successive swinging bunts and constantly got little bleeders through. Andy was getting squeezed like no other. He didn't have his best stuff but if the defense makes a few plays that they should make and a few balls bounce somewhere near some fielders and the score is 3-1.

It's so funny. I think Lieter said that if Wakefield threw with a little more velocity all of those deep, fly balls would be home runs. Wakefield is so bad he is good. It's damn hilarious. -Jitpal

cmaff051 wrote:

TKF wrote:

cmaff051 wrote:Is there a team that gets some bloopers, flares and bleeders than the Red Sox?

LOL.. Yea, the angels..

True... I forgot about them... the Red Sox are close, though...

LOL.... the angels can literally put up 9 runs and the ball never leaves the infield..