RealGM

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:15 am**

tied 2-2

CC was rolling till the 7th :roll:

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:17 am**

What's this news about the angels getting Kazmir... WTF!!

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:51 am**

Pharmcat wrote:tied 2-2

CC was rolling till the 7th

Thought he was gona go 8 IP 0 R but then came the 7th inning but he did give us a great outing... Buehrle was horrible as of late and throws a quality outing against us . That bases loaded situation with Cano really hurt us. Why is he worse in Bases Loaded situations when you get better pitches to hit :roll:

Either he puts too much pressure on himself or lack of patience.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:28 am**

I hate bunts.

I love homeruns.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:35 am**

Cano!!

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:47 am**

Cano made up for bouncing out to the first baseman with the bases loaded. I still don't like his hot dogging. I'd take Pedroia over Cano any day because I hate that posing **** he does but nontheless, he won it for the Yanks.

Our old buddy Jose Contrearas against Andy Pettitte. I hope the Yanks bash the **** out of this ****. He couldn't throw a strike to save his life when he was a starter in NYC then he goes to Chicago and suddenly comes out with that forkball. ****.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:53 pm**

actually, contreras has been awful this year. obviously, he'll throw a gem against us.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:12 pm**

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:13 pm**

Dr. Detfink wrote:Cano made up for bouncing out to the first baseman with the bases loaded. I still don't like his hot dogging. I'd take Pedroia over Cano any day because I hate that posing **** he does but nontheless, he won it for the Yanks.

Our old buddy Jose Contrearas against Andy Pettitte. I hope the Yanks bash the **** out of this ****. He couldn't throw a strike to save his life when he was a starter in NYC then he goes to Chicago and suddenly comes out with that forkball. ****.

ehhh cano with a clutch hit finally, its ok if he poses a little lol

and mitre is going today

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:01 pm**

here's to hoping that we never, ever see a bunt from the new york yankees ever, ever again.

we're awesome.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:22 pm**

Pharmcat wrote::onfire:

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:26 pm**

how bout arods D? just marvelous

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:11 pm**

Hey, I am all about fundamentals and I support bunting. The problem is, Nick Swisher isn't the player who should be bunting in that situation.

Posted: **Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:24 pm**

thefuriousfive wrote:here's to hoping that we never, ever see a bunt from the new york yankees ever, ever again.

we're awesome.

i like small ball.....but only in the right case

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:13 am**

Pharmcat wrote:
thefuriousfive wrote:here's to hoping that we never, ever see a bunt from the new york yankees ever, ever again.

we're awesome.

i like small ball.....but only in the right case

small ball really doesn't belong in the american league. you cannot be willing to give up outs when probability and baseball statistics repeatedly show that taking away outs will only put you in a hole. and apparently playing small ball gives you "grit". what nonsense. and please tell jeter to stop f*@king bunting.

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:26 pm**

If small ball doesn't exist in the AL, then you can erase the 4 WS the NY Yankees won in the mid to end of 90s. That team embodied manufacturing runs because let's face it, if you think you're going to hit the **** out of the ball in the playoffs, that's NOT going to happen.

The Yanks failures over the last 8 years have been because they thought they could win the world series by slugging the **** out of the ball: See Giambi, Sheffield, etc.

Practicing a little small ball is Not a bad thing. It will come in handy in a tight game. Believe you me, there will be tight games come 5 game series.

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:56 pm**

That's bull. The Yankees didn't play small ball in the late 90s. Those were some seriously powerful offenses that didn't need to play small ball because they hit the ball so well.

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:32 pm**

In the 90s we won with situational hitting and top notch pitching, not with bunting guys over.

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:47 pm**

Dr. Detfink wrote:
The Yanks failures over the last 8 years have been because they thought they could win the world series by slugging the **** out of the ball: See Giambi, Sheffield, etc.

I could have sworn it was due to throwing bums like Jared Wright, 45 year old Clemens, Corey Lidle (RIP, but still he shouldn't have been on a playoff roster), Kevin Brown etc... not to mention Tom Gordon imploding in 04.

Pitching wins championships.

Posted: **Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:32 pm**

nykgeneralmanager wrote:In the 90s we won with situational hitting and top notch pitching, not with bunting guys over.

and there were different heroes every game,every year.. You would have wettland, then mo, then jeter, then paulie then bernie, then chad curtis, then jimmy key, then chili davis, then cecil fielder, then wade boggs, then charlie hayes... everyone played a huge part... and don't forget mr. post season scott brosius....

yesterday, have to give it up to mitre. I guess the yankees knew this guy had something in him. I thought he couldn't pitch. yesterday he was a beast..

RealGM

white sox at yanks

white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks

Re: white sox at yanks