Where lies the probelm?
Posted: Fri Apr 6, 2007 12:19 am
Bored at work today so I did some research. I went to baseballamerica.com (maybe the most respected baseball site there is) and looked at their Top 100 Prospects report from 2000-2007. During this 8 eight year span, the Giants have had 14 prospects ranked in the top 100. That is less than 2 per year. I am going to say not too good but that is a different story. What is very alarming is this fact. Of those 14, only 4 made the opening day roster this year. 4! And only 2 are going to really contribute!
So where is the problem? The Giants, at one time or another, have high prospects but they never seem to develop. Why? Are we not putting enough money into our farm system? Not teaching these guys the right way to play ball? What? I look at systems like the A's, Marlins, Braves and see they cycles players through on a near yearly basis and are always in the hunt. What are we doing wrong?
Why did Tony Torcato never develop? Todd Linden Lance Niekro look like career backups at best? Kurt Ainsworth? Fred Lewis?
Should we be worried about Marcus Sanders who is on the list and Emmanuel Burris who should be on the list next year?
This is not a good trend.
So where is the problem? The Giants, at one time or another, have high prospects but they never seem to develop. Why? Are we not putting enough money into our farm system? Not teaching these guys the right way to play ball? What? I look at systems like the A's, Marlins, Braves and see they cycles players through on a near yearly basis and are always in the hunt. What are we doing wrong?
Why did Tony Torcato never develop? Todd Linden Lance Niekro look like career backups at best? Kurt Ainsworth? Fred Lewis?
Should we be worried about Marcus Sanders who is on the list and Emmanuel Burris who should be on the list next year?
This is not a good trend.
