Mariners show interest in Chan Ho Park
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 4:24 pm
by Bow2Yao11
http://rotoworld.com/content/playerpage ... LB&id=1918
Do you guys think that Park can help out the rotation? I think he can be an adequate starter like a Bautista with more K ability. A move to the bullpen is more likely with the rotation set. What do you guys think?
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 5:05 pm
by Basketball Jesus
Expensive and irrelevent.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 5:07 pm
by Sweezo
Ahhh...and Basketball Jesus point seems valid. Why trade anything for Chan Ho Park? Is he really any better than Sean White or Julio Mateo? Keep in mind this is coming from someone who loathes Julio Mateo...
Park's success came when he pitched in a great pitcher's park, which may lead some to believe he could succeed in Safeco. I'm not so sure...his three year splits @ SafeCo reveal a 4.22 ERA in 5 games. Is that someone worth trading for?
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 5:22 pm
by Basketball Jesus
Isn
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 5:28 pm
by Sweezo
Basketball Jesus wrote:Isn
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 6:07 pm
by Basketball Jesus
What's the status on Putz? Still day-to-day?
Posted: Tue Apr 3, 2007 1:06 am
by Sweezo
Basketball Jesus wrote:What's the status on Putz? Still day-to-day?
I wasn't sure but he pitched the ninth inning today without any apparent difficulty...must be good to go.
Re: Mariners show interest in Chan Ho Park
Posted: Tue Apr 3, 2007 2:32 pm
by Ex-hippie
Bow2Yao11 wrote:http://rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=MLB&id=1918
Do you guys think that Park can help out the rotation? I think he can be an adequate starter like a Bautista with more K ability. A move to the bullpen is more likely with the rotation set. What do you guys think?
The last time he was an adequate starter was 2001. Could he succeed as some kind of reclamation project? I guess, if you sign him to a minor league contract and use him when a starter gets hurt. But why not just stick with Batista? Who needs more K's?
Posted: Tue Apr 3, 2007 10:52 pm
by studcrackers
the only time i remember chan ho having success was when the rangers traveled to seattle always seemed to pitch decent at safeco.
Posted: Tue Apr 3, 2007 11:47 pm
by Sweezo
studcrackers wrote:the only time i remember chan ho having success was when the rangers traveled to seattle always seemed to pitch decent at safeco.
He has a 4.22 ERA over the last three years at SafeCo...not fantastic.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 5:41 pm
by Milkdud
Is he still working off the big old deal Texas gave him couple years ago? If so I cant see any reason to bring him in. BBJ spoke the truth hes very very marginal at a very high price.