Yuni to KC
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:28 pm
On the wiretap. Right after Shelton was called up. Is he the plan for shortstop? Because Cedeno obviously isn't the answer.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=926000
Sweezo wrote:I'll take Cedeno over Yuni...Cedeno's defense is decent, while Yuni was argubaly the worst defensive SS in baseball. Kudos to the organization for getting rid of a player who didn't really like to try hard.
jumanji wrote:I'd still be up for Jack Wilson, he's young enough he could be part of the future
trwi7 wrote:jumanji wrote:I'd still be up for Jack Wilson, he's young enough he could be part of the future
He's going to be 32. He's not that young, but he's a good stopgap.
Bay_Areas_Finest wrote:Ronny Cedeno is beyond garbage. I woul have preferred Yuni out there instead of him. Atleast Betancourt can hit above .200. But now that this trade has happened, we should call someone up from the minors and start him at SS so Cedeno never plays again. But I'm sure we'd hear some lame excuse like "Well Cedeno is a veteran" or somethin.
jumanji wrote:Cedeno, whose heart i like by the way, is not going to be the answer hitting a buck fifty. If someone can point to someone in the history of baseball that lasted hitting below the Mendoza line let me know.
Bay_Areas_Finest wrote:Ronny Cedeno is beyond garbage. I woul have preferred Yuni out there instead of him. Atleast Betancourt can hit above .200. But now that this trade has happened, we should call someone up from the minors and start him at SS so Cedeno never plays again. But I'm sure we'd hear some lame excuse like "Well Cedeno is a veteran" or somethin.
jumanji wrote:Cedeno isnt the answer and i chuckle at the announcers who say "it's his job for the rest of the season", come on guys dont insult our intelligence. I could live with .250 for Ronny but he isnt going to survive at sub .200. Why cant we find a Michael Young to play SS, is it that hard?
Sweezo wrote:jumanji wrote:Cedeno isnt the answer and i chuckle at the announcers who say "it's his job for the rest of the season", come on guys dont insult our intelligence. I could live with .250 for Ronny but he isnt going to survive at sub .200. Why cant we find a Michael Young to play SS, is it that hard?
Again, the argument isn't 'who gets more base hits', it's about who is the better overall baseball player. That means who's the better defender, who hits for more power, who gets on base better, who knows how to work a count better, etc. If you add all those things up, Cedeno's not good. And yet, still comes out well ahead of the newest Royal...
Cedeno makes plays in the field that Betancourt didn't, and he does it with enough regularity that he contributes more to this team than Betancourt did.
Washburn, Felix, Olson, Vargas, Aardsma, and Bedard aren't having better years because of some mechanical tweak Rick Adair suggested...they look better because they play in a big park with a vastly improved defense behind them.
Take Washburn, for example. Washburn's still a flyball pitcher...his LD% this year [23%] is nearly the same as last year's [22%]. His HR rate is nearly identical as last year's. Granted his K% is a bit higher, but that doesn't explain why his XBH% is the lowest it's ever been in his career. Washburn's an established quantity...you know what to expect from him on a year to year basis. If he's giving up the same amount as line drives as last year, and knowing he has no control over where those LD go, why is his ERA the lowest it's ever been in his career?
Because he has guys behind him who can get to balls put in play that most players can't. That's it. He hasn't reinvented himself. He's still, by and large, the same player he's been for the last decade.
Defense is hugely important to why this year's team is fighting for a playoff spot, and Cedeno's defense is superior to Yuni's. Who hits .200 and who hits .250 is largely irrelevant to me...it's one stat that takes a narrow view of what it means to help a team win games. There's a lot more things to consider when determining who's the better player.
In three hundred years kids will be sitting around a campfire and singing songs about how bad a shortstop Yuniesky Betancourt was.