This would make us big time contenders...

DIRKtheGREAT · Post #1 » by **DIRKtheGREAT** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:43 pm

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=802~841~692&teams=15~15~6&te=&cash=

I've been wanting Dallas to pull the trigger on this trade since I heard about Milwaukee having Redd in different trade scenerios. This would give us that deadley outside threat and a sg that we DONT have. He and Dirk would be our outside bombers and Howard, hopefully, will keep being the slasher he has been so far. It would help Kidd out on his penetration for kick-outs. The reason why Milwaukee would do it is because they are in a rebuilding process and Stack and Terry could help that move along faster. They could buy out Stack's contract and wait out Terry's or trade him within the next few years. what do you guys think???????

Basketballmania · Post #2 » by **Basketballmania** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:35 pm

MAAAAAAKEEE IT HAAAAPPEEEEEEN !!!!!

GermanFan120 · Post #3 » by **GermanFan120** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:39 pm

anyone compared to Stack this days will be an upgrade.

but adding Redd is not gonna change anything, it only makes us suck less

i think we should rebuild

TheLSUMaverick · Post #4 » by **TheLSUMaverick** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:28 pm

We would be set with this trade all we need then is a backup PG and it's game time our big 4 would be better than all those big 3's! I don't see us making the move on this though but i got my fingers crossed

jwa1107 · Post #5 » by **jwa1107** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:28 pm

why would MIL take on JET's contract?
I can't see them doing it for so little in return from DAL

DIRKtheGREAT · Post #6 » by **DIRKtheGREAT** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:30 pm

This would be the 1st step of the long, miserable rebuilding process...but i guess if we HHAADDD to we could throw in a 2nd rounder

jwa1107 · Post #7 » by **jwa1107** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:55 pm

but MIL gets no quality in return for the quality player they give up
no immediate cap relief
no first round draft pick (seconds are worthless int trades)
surely MIL could get more from other teams and should if this is DAL's offer

dirkforpres · Post #8 » by **dirkforpres** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:07 pm

Milwaukee would want more.. There isnt too much we can get for a couple of swingmen playing below average at best, especially not Redd. Maybe if we threw in enough cash for them to buy out Stackhouse then they would accept

JES12 · Post #9 » by **JES12** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:58 am

I don't care if it sucks for Milwaukee.....make it happen!

Post #10 » by **HMFFL** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:07 am

DIRKtheGREAT wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=802~841~692&teams=15~15~6&te=&cash=

I've been wanting Dallas to pull the trigger on this trade since I heard about Milwaukee having Redd in different trade scenerios. This would give us that deadley outside threat and a sg that we DONT have. He and Dirk would be our outside bombers and Howard, hopefully, will keep being the slasher he has been so far. It would help Kidd out on his penetration for kick-outs. The reason why Milwaukee would do it is because they are in a rebuilding process and Stack and Terry could help that move along faster. They could buy out Stack's contract and wait out Terry's or trade him within the next few years. what do you guys think???????

Milwaukee probably sticks with Redd's contract and the only star they have. Richard Jefferson's not happy being with Milwaukee and the Bucks can't rely on him to carry the team. It just handicaps them by taking on Jason's contract and doesn't free them of enough money to make a major impact during free agency. It's still a nice deal for us.

JES12 · Post #11 » by **JES12** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:12 am

I'd do Terry + Howard + Stack for Redd + Jefferson if Jefferson does not want to be there.