Archx wrote:Ni Da Ye wrote:Archx wrote:
You clearly didn't follow that team if you don't know what i'm talking about. When Gasol got traded, he obviously improved the team but he had to toughen up. His biggest criticism was the fact that he got constantly bullied. That changed once Lakers got their ass kicked by the Celtics.
So i don't know what your point is with Kyrie because there are zero issues with him so far.
I clearly watched the games back then and knew what i am talking about.
I didn't say Pau was flawless in the Laskers, I said Pau had no problem gelling with the team and improved their winning records.
Kyrie's issue is not his numbers, the issue is that has not translated to WINNING, which is why we brought him here.
Kyrie's On/Off numbers are +10.9 and Mavs ORTG with him on the floor is 129, almost 9 higher than with Doncic and 3pt higher than Jokic's. Defense is slightly worse but that's not his problem. He's actually way better than Dinwiddie who's On/Off was constantly around -10.
Problem is in Mavs lineup combinations and paint protection. Best Mavs lineup of Luka, Green, Hardaway, Maxi, Wood, barely plays together. They are team high +11. You insert Kyrie in to the mix instead of THJ and you have something special. A good mixture of offense, defense and great spacing. Kidd is too dumb to figure this out and Maxi was obviously injured.
But the point is, Kyrie is NOT the problem. He's averaging 26/7 on 65% TS. Chemistry is also there but the same factors that bothered Mavs last season in the playoffs are very much present today.
No team is going to win anything if they can't protect their own rim. You saw Suns scored almost all of their points in the paint at the start of the game. Same thing happened vs Pacers when Rick used Turner to absolutey abuse Powell in PnR. Suns followed the same plan.
When did I say Kyrie is the single problem?
What I said was if trading for someone like Kyrie can directly translate to winning? That's a good trade to me.
Otherwise, it means either/or situation below:
1) Kyrie by himself is not good enough to help us translate to winning. (Thank about it, if we got KD instead of Kyrie, we probably wouldn't have the 2-6 records when the two stars are playing together)
2) If Kyrie by himself is not good enough, we must have follow up trade to complete the roster.
So far, neither 1) nor 2) happened, hence why the 2-6 records.