ImageImageImage

Mavericks 2017 Draft #9

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

bran muffin
Starter
Posts: 2,122
And1: 3,441
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1081 » by bran muffin » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:07 am

Teffer10 wrote:And I just don't understand all of the interest in Rubio. He would be a horrible fit on this team.



I think Mavs fans are thinking Rubio would be a defensive-minded, pass-first point guard. The second coming of Jason Kidd, circa 2008. Well, I guess Rubio would technically be the third coming of Jason Kidd in Dallas, but whatever.

Unfortunately, we don't have prime Dirk around anymore. Prime Dirk allowed the Mavs to get away with a lot of stuff. We're not gonna get away with a point guard converting only 36% of his shot attempts. Not anymore.
agentofatlas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,634
And1: 1,026
Joined: May 23, 2011

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1082 » by agentofatlas » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:46 am

If Rubio continues his post ASB play then he's a steal. Him and Isaac would be a great haul.
Hadley
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 182
Joined: Jun 30, 2014

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1083 » by Hadley » Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:34 am

I'd take Rubio if we trade up, but I doubt it. Major problem with Rubio is that he can't score to **** save his life.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,059
And1: 4,169
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1084 » by daoneandonly » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:28 pm

Mr B wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Even if that asset is Wes Matthews?


Yes because that means we're taking Nkinnia over DSJ and/or Issac, and thats just criminally stupid. Though as u know, i live parting ways with Wes


What makes you think that? If the Mavs are trading Wes/9 for Rubio/7 then I would expect the Mavs to take Isaac at 7 since they would already have their PG.


Well if it's FUltz-Ball-Jackson-Fox-Tatum in whatever order, then that means Issac or DSJ will definitley be there at 7. So if we trade up to 7 and still take Nkinnia, that's just foolish.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Captain_Obvious
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,831
And1: 1,001
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1085 » by Captain_Obvious » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:29 pm

The day of truth has arrived. Can't wait.

I'm happy with all those guys we can possibly get, this draft is legit 9-10 deep. I only doubt Markannen's mobility, but maybe thats just stereotyping.

My Ranking (only possible players):
1) Whoever drops
2) Smith
3) Isaac
4) Frank
5) Monk
...
...
10) Mitchell
...
...
15) Markannen

We need to outlast the Warriors, so trading Barnes for an extra top-15 pick could be the smart thing to do. Doubt anyone bites though. I would entertain a trade with Portland where we take on Leonard or Turner and in turn get their picks.
Hadley
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 182
Joined: Jun 30, 2014

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1086 » by Hadley » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:40 pm

Yeah, anyone is fine except Markannen and Mitchell or one of the white Bigs like Collins or that Jimmer Fredette 2.0...
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1087 » by Mr B » Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:21 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
Mr B wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Yes because that means we're taking Nkinnia over DSJ and/or Issac, and thats just criminally stupid. Though as u know, i live parting ways with Wes


What makes you think that? If the Mavs are trading Wes/9 for Rubio/7 then I would expect the Mavs to take Isaac at 7 since they would already have their PG.


Well if it's FUltz-Ball-Jackson-Fox-Tatum in whatever order, then that means Issac or DSJ will definitley be there at 7. So if we trade up to 7 and still take Nkinnia, that's just foolish.


Right, but if the proposed trade happen they would be trading up while also acquiring a PG. there would be no need to then draft another PG when Isaac is still on the board. If the Mavs pulled off that trade it would be to draft Isaac not Ntilikina.
User avatar
Jinra
Starter
Posts: 2,099
And1: 121
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1088 » by Jinra » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:55 pm

I am not a Rubio fan, but I sures hell ain't no Matthews fan neither. Yall can have this "my team" love for him if you like, it was a horrible signing when they did it and it is still horrible now. He is replaceable and for less money.
Dallas Mavericks 2011 NBA World Champions!!!
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1089 » by Pinkyring » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:00 pm

Jinra wrote:I am not a Rubio fan, but I sures hell ain't no Matthews fan neither. Yall can have this "my team" love for him if you like, it was a horrible signing when they did it and it is still horrible now. He is replaceable and for less money.

I like wes just not at the money and not with him needing to create his own shot. He would fit nice with a pass first pg like rubio to get him looks. As for his money i think we all hate that he should have been a 12-14 guy especially coming off injury, why we maxed him i have no idea
User avatar
Jinra
Starter
Posts: 2,099
And1: 121
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1090 » by Jinra » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:02 pm

Pinkyring wrote:
Jinra wrote:I am not a Rubio fan, but I sures hell ain't no Matthews fan neither. Yall can have this "my team" love for him if you like, it was a horrible signing when they did it and it is still horrible now. He is replaceable and for less money.

I like wes just not at the money and not with him needing to create his own shot. He would fit nice with a pass first pg like rubio to get him looks. As for his money i think we all hate that he should have been a 12-14 guy especially coming off injury, why we maxed him i have no idea


Well said. I guess the question is why does Dallas value him more than Rubio and the 7th pick?
Dallas Mavericks 2011 NBA World Champions!!!
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1091 » by Devassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:15 pm

Jinra wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:
Jinra wrote:I am not a Rubio fan, but I sures hell ain't no Matthews fan neither. Yall can have this "my team" love for him if you like, it was a horrible signing when they did it and it is still horrible now. He is replaceable and for less money.

I like wes just not at the money and not with him needing to create his own shot. He would fit nice with a pass first pg like rubio to get him looks. As for his money i think we all hate that he should have been a 12-14 guy especially coming off injury, why we maxed him i have no idea


Well said. I guess the question is why does Dallas value him more than Rubio and the 7th pick?


Because our moronic front office thinks that 'good locker room presence/nice guy' is worth paying 18 million a year for and keeping regardless of how awful he plays on the court or how good a player in return would fit
Dirk
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 13,646
And1: 37,512
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
     

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1092 » by Dirk » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:19 pm

Latest from Chad Ford
Read on Twitter


9. Dallas Mavericks

Dennis Smith

Other potential draftees: Jonathan Isaac, Frank Ntilikina, Lauri Markkanen, Zach Collins

The Mavs covet Isaac and have been trying to move up a couple of spots to grab him. So far, they've been unable to work out a deal.

The Mavs were strongly leaning toward Ntilikina, to the point that they invited his head coach at Strasbourg, Vincent Collet, to come coach the Mavs' Orlando Summer League team. However, they walked away from a workout with Smith last week totally smitten by Smith's athleticism and scoring abilities.

If both are on the board, this becomes a really tough decision between getting the best player now and potentially the best player in three years. Dallas hasn't had to be patient for a while. Can it?

There's also talk of the Mavs swapping picks with the Wolves, but right now the cost is too high for Dallas.



Devassa wrote:Because our moronic front office thinks that 'good locker room presence/nice guy' is worth paying 18 million a year for and keeping regardless of how awful he plays on the court or how good a player in return would fit


It could be a very elaborate 'smokescreen'. It certainly is better to give the appearance that you value players very highly as opposed to do what Phil Jackson has done with Carmelo/Porzingis.

I doubt anyone believes the Mavs would reject Matthews/9 for Rubio/7. It's certainly hard to digest the things you read that almost paint the idea that the Mavs view Matthews as a star but at the same we have to take things with a grain of salt.

You mentioned cap space... they can waive Devin Harris and gain an extra 3 million. That's another thing to monitor with the whole love for veterans in mind.
User avatar
Jinra
Starter
Posts: 2,099
And1: 121
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1093 » by Jinra » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:36 pm

Dirk Nowitzki wrote:
Spoiler:
Latest from Chad Ford
Read on Twitter


9. Dallas Mavericks

Dennis Smith

Other potential draftees: Jonathan Isaac, Frank Ntilikina, Lauri Markkanen, Zach Collins

The Mavs covet Isaac and have been trying to move up a couple of spots to grab him. So far, they've been unable to work out a deal.

The Mavs were strongly leaning toward Ntilikina, to the point that they invited his head coach at Strasbourg, Vincent Collet, to come coach the Mavs' Orlando Summer League team. However, they walked away from a workout with Smith last week totally smitten by Smith's athleticism and scoring abilities.

If both are on the board, this becomes a really tough decision between getting the best player now and potentially the best player in three years. Dallas hasn't had to be patient for a while. Can it?

There's also talk of the Mavs swapping picks with the Wolves, but right now the cost is too high for Dallas.



Devassa wrote:Because our moronic front office thinks that 'good locker room presence/nice guy' is worth paying 18 million a year for and keeping regardless of how awful he plays on the court or how good a player in return would fit


It could be a very elaborate 'smokescreen'. It certainly is better to give the appearance that you value players very highly as opposed to do what Phil Jackson has done with Carmelo/Porzingis.

I doubt anyone believes the Mavs would reject Matthews/9 for Rubio/7. It's certainly hard to digest the things you read that almost paint the idea that the Mavs view Matthews as a star but at the same we have to take things with a grain of salt.

You mentioned cap space... they can waive Devin Harris and gain an extra 3 million. That's another thing to monitor with the whole love for veterans in mind.


Great points sir. Thanks for easing my mind a bit.
Dallas Mavericks 2011 NBA World Champions!!!
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1094 » by Pinkyring » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:42 pm

Dirk Nowitzki wrote:Latest from Chad Ford
Read on Twitter


9. Dallas Mavericks

Dennis Smith

Other potential draftees: Jonathan Isaac, Frank Ntilikina, Lauri Markkanen, Zach Collins

The Mavs covet Isaac and have been trying to move up a couple of spots to grab him. So far, they've been unable to work out a deal.

The Mavs were strongly leaning toward Ntilikina, to the point that they invited his head coach at Strasbourg, Vincent Collet, to come coach the Mavs' Orlando Summer League team. However, they walked away from a workout with Smith last week totally smitten by Smith's athleticism and scoring abilities.

If both are on the board, this becomes a really tough decision between getting the best player now and potentially the best player in three years. Dallas hasn't had to be patient for a while. Can it?

There's also talk of the Mavs swapping picks with the Wolves, but right now the cost is too high for Dallas.



Devassa wrote:Because our moronic front office thinks that 'good locker room presence/nice guy' is worth paying 18 million a year for and keeping regardless of how awful he plays on the court or how good a player in return would fit


It could be a very elaborate 'smokescreen'. It certainly is better to give the appearance that you value players very highly as opposed to do what Phil Jackson has done with Carmelo/Porzingis.

I doubt anyone believes the Mavs would reject Matthews/9 for Rubio/7. It's certainly hard to digest the things you read that almost paint the idea that the Mavs view Matthews as a star but at the same we have to take things with a grain of salt.

You mentioned cap space... they can waive Devin Harris and gain an extra 3 million. That's another thing to monitor with the whole love for veterans in mind.

Is fors credible. Hes technically unemployed
Teffer10
Head Coach
Posts: 7,236
And1: 1,040
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
     

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1095 » by Teffer10 » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:56 pm

Hadley wrote:Yeah, anyone is fine except Markannen and Mitchell or one of the white Bigs like Collins or that Jimmer Fredette 2.0...

When did the Finnish Sniper become non-white and/or small? :D
User avatar
Jinra
Starter
Posts: 2,099
And1: 121
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1096 » by Jinra » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:04 pm

Read on Twitter


Yikes Coop!!! Not something we wanna hear.
Dallas Mavericks 2011 NBA World Champions!!!
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1097 » by Devassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:10 pm

Jinra wrote:
Read on Twitter


Yikes Coop!!! Not something we wanna hear.


It's always nice knowing the fans don't matter at all to the front office :roll:
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1098 » by Devassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:47 pm

Dirk Nowitzki wrote:Latest from Chad Ford
Read on Twitter


9. Dallas Mavericks

Dennis Smith

Other potential draftees: Jonathan Isaac, Frank Ntilikina, Lauri Markkanen, Zach Collins

The Mavs covet Isaac and have been trying to move up a couple of spots to grab him. So far, they've been unable to work out a deal.

The Mavs were strongly leaning toward Ntilikina, to the point that they invited his head coach at Strasbourg, Vincent Collet, to come coach the Mavs' Orlando Summer League team. However, they walked away from a workout with Smith last week totally smitten by Smith's athleticism and scoring abilities.

If both are on the board, this becomes a really tough decision between getting the best player now and potentially the best player in three years. Dallas hasn't had to be patient for a while. Can it?

There's also talk of the Mavs swapping picks with the Wolves, but right now the cost is too high for Dallas.



Devassa wrote:Because our moronic front office thinks that 'good locker room presence/nice guy' is worth paying 18 million a year for and keeping regardless of how awful he plays on the court or how good a player in return would fit


It could be a very elaborate 'smokescreen'. It certainly is better to give the appearance that you value players very highly as opposed to do what Phil Jackson has done with Carmelo/Porzingis.

I doubt anyone believes the Mavs would reject Matthews/9 for Rubio/7. It's certainly hard to digest the things you read that almost paint the idea that the Mavs view Matthews as a star but at the same we have to take things with a grain of salt.

You mentioned cap space... they can waive Devin Harris and gain an extra 3 million. That's another thing to monitor with the whole love for veterans in mind.


Well here's to hoping you're right. It just doesn't feel like the front office values winning in the slightest, at least for the next couple years till Matthews expires
k-lynch201
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,303
And1: 92
Joined: Jun 16, 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:
   

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1099 » by k-lynch201 » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:58 pm

If we trade up to 7, whatever the deal is..thats one story.

But we cannot select Frank if were trading up, it depends who Orlando picks, cause they will likely take one player we covet.

Then it depends who Minny would pick, they seem to be interested in a PF/C... and if they take a player like that..we will have one of our top options left at 9, whoever that is.
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#1100 » by Devassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:17 pm

k-lynch201 wrote:If we trade up to 7, whatever the deal is..thats one story.

But we cannot select Frank if were trading up, it depends who Orlando picks, cause they will likely take one player we covet.

Then it depends who Minny would pick, they seem to be interested in a PF/C... and if they take a player like that..we will have one of our top options left at 9, whoever that is.


7 is necessary because even if Isaac is gone, you are guaranteed Smith. Both of those guys are a tier above Ntilikina and Monk in my opinion

Return to Dallas Mavericks