Archx wrote:Did Mavs drop the ball with Brunson?
From reading that article, my understanding is that Brunson wanted to sign basically almost any deal in the range of 10-15M but Mavs declined... And then when Mavs came back with more or less same deal obviously his camp declined and said wait until the end of playoffs. Now, even if Cuban still wants to resign him, he'll basically have to pay 10-15M more than Brunson would initially signed if offered. (PER YEAR).
If i am correct and if i understood it correctly, then Cuban shot himself in the foot. And i always said Mavs need Brunson and they have to resign him but not at any cost, now if Brunson continues to have great playoffs, they will have to pay a ton more. Problem is, Mavs can't afford to lose him because they have no cap left and the same team without him will get much worse.
I think they dropped the ball. The reverse of what happened to Nerlens Noel. When he came back to the table, the offer was not there anymore. Mavs could have bought low on Brunson. 10 to 15M is way below market value, this summer they would have to pay top dollar (even more if Detroit fails to get Ayton, they might throw 30M at Brunson).
Like the above post, from a strict business standpoint, I would not be opposed to dual sign and trades with the Orlando Magic. Gary Harris got his groove back in December and is a positive on defense when he is on the floor. Shoots 38% from 3 which is not bad. 6'4 and is a 3&D point guard. Basically a Bullock and a DFS in a PG body. Brunson signs for 25M BYC, you S&T him to Orlando for Harris who signs for half of that at 12.5M. That works with the CBA and Mavs avoid being hard capped into signing another player at 25M. From a business standpoint, it makes sense.
So basically the production you lose with Brunson, just squeeze more from Dinwiddie, Harris and Bertans. They are paid to do so anyway. Just dont lose him for nothing is the point Im trying to make.