daoneandonly wrote:Hideous, why not go after Eric Gordon? A better player for much less? Our FO sucks, we have no PG or C and we extend a max offer to the single reason GS did not win the finals. So freakin annoyed.
Sent from my LGLS751 using
RealGM mobile app
Gordon signed for a very fair deal. So yeah, I wouldn't mind that deal if the Mavs aren't "tanking". But... there's a reason why the front office goes for Barnes and not Gordon. Barnes is still young (24) and has been durable. Barnes also fills the SF spot and can play PF, a better fit.
Now, as to the Parsons vs Barnes comparisons, I have yet to see anyone convince me that Barnes is better than Parsons. Parsons is so much better than Barnes on offense, it's not close. Defensively, in GS, it's always Green and Thompson and Iguodala doing the heavy work. Barnes just basically is there to not screw things up. And I didn't see much that made me excited that he would make a jump.
Regularized Adjusted Plus-MinusRAPM 2015/2016Harrison Barnes
O: -0.07 D: -0.28 Overall: -0.36
Parsons
O: 0.13 D: 0.33 Overall: 0.46
Multiyear:Harrison Barnes -1.47 0.03 -1.44
Chandler Parsons 1.36 0.75 2.11
Parsons actually ranks out better than Barnes.
There's a fair point about age and injuries. Barnes should also be more athletic and stronger we would hope, especially on defense with the ability to switch on different body types. As I wrote yesterday, there are a ton of contracts now (and there will be more next year) that will feel "horrible", when that happens, our mentality has to shift and focus on the reality that this is the new market value for these players. So I am just hoping that if the Warriors don't match, Barnes doesn't totally bust.