ejs78 wrote:leolozon wrote:ejs78 wrote:Wasnt a complaint last year that they didn't beat bad teams enough?
Sent from my SM-G960U using
RealGM Forums mobile app
Their record against teams playing for less than .500 was indeed bad last year, but I rather see a team win against good teams than the opposite, as that's what they're going to play in the playoffs.
You can also beat bad teams impressively. They didn't play that well in any of the 4 wins.
Obviously you want to beat good teams as well, but we're only 6 games into the season and already nothing they do is good enough.
Sent from my SM-G960U using
RealGM Forums mobile app
Are you arguing that being 27th in offensive rating is good enough? Your expectation before the season was to be grouped on offense with OKC, Detroit and Houston to start the year?
Even in wins, they would be 16th in PPG and that's against bad teams.
Is that good enough for you? If it isn't, then why your comment? You would agree with me that 27th in offensive rating isn't good enough.
As for "only 6 games". Well yeah, there's only 6 games played. You want people to not have an opinion yet, leave the forum and come back after 20 games?
It's still a small sample size, but it's the only data we have to discuss and so far the data is factually subpar. It's reality, not negativity.
It's still nice to be 4-2 despite the way they've played. If they right the ship, then they can certainly manage to get to 50 wins, which was my expectation for this team.