joesha1698 wrote:41Dirk41 wrote:The only 3 people in the world who support this trade are you, Charles Barkley and Kendrick Perkins.
It's enough.
Ownership made this call. I support getting A.Davis back in return. I think under the circumstances Nico had to keep this on the hush (without drawing any attention) and he called someone who he knew would keep quiet (Pelinka) and got the best possible player he could get under the directives of the ownership. It's no surprise that Lebron is getting old and the Lakers want a big name star.
Now, if I was advising ownership, would I advise them to trade Luka? Most likely not. Am I happy we got AD back considering the constraints I believe ownership put Nico under, yes. Do I think this was the best thing to happen to Luka's career? Yes. Even though it sucks for Mav fans - Luka actually wasnt taking his body seriously. Adversity needs to happen to propel you to be better.
Let's stop pretending this was Nico's decision. You don't trade the franchise player without ownership wanting to do it and telling you to do it.
Of course it was his decision. He literally colluded with his Lakers buddy. Or do you think the random new owners who have been in Dallas a minute decided to call up the Lakers guy who happened to be buddies with the Mavs GM...
Do you even attempt to present a logical argument as to why the Mavs didn't check with other teams? Let me guess, you will act as if you genuinely believe that if Luka was on the market, he'd land less than this putrid return?
Even if someone pinpoints every Luka handicap and says he is obese or whatever. His trade value was still galaxies more than what this trade returned. And that is unforgivable. If you are going to make a very strange trade... at least maximise the return. Whether Luka wanted to be here or not is irrelevant. It's not relevant if Luka drinks or eats too much.
It's slightly amusing that the Mavs completed a ridiculous trade and now post-trade some may try to devalue Luka's value, bringing up the tired narratives over weight, etc... when that is immaterial. His trade value was still much higher and what is relevant is that his trade value was far higher than what the Mavs got back. The Mavs didn't maximise the value in what would always be a very "strange" trade no matter the return. There is a reason that hardly anyone believes this trade actually happened... but hey... it's interesting that no matter how crazy something is, there are always some with different perspectives. Maybe some cope mechanism if it comes from a Mavs fan... but it's okay, the world would be boring if everyone thought the same, although in this case, it does appear 99.9% of the NBA world world thinks the same and is just in disbelief over the GM/Owners sabotaging the Mavs/fans.