arkuo wrote:hagredionis wrote:arkuo wrote:
Westbrook averaged a triple double for 2 or 3 seasons straight. He's the first example you pull up to say that stats don't matter if you can't win. It would just make for some nice youtube highlights.
Luka wont be able to change people's opinions of him overnight the same way he cant stop getting 15 technical fouls every year after saying he needs to do better the year prior. It will stay that way until he wins something. And as of right last night, he has the same number of rings as Booker and Trae Young. He just talks more.
Luka is like Booker or Trae? Really? I'm always puzzled when people write stuff like that. Luka is 5x times 1st team NBA at the age of 25. He has also won the scoring title this season. Yeah he has not won a ring yet but how many rings has the GOAT MJ won at his age?
So if we go by that metric, then Russell Westbrook is far better than Luka with 1 MVP award and 2 seasons averaging a triple double.
And please, let's pump the brakes on Luka - MJ comparisons for now. Luka has yet to show up in this playoffs. Kyrie was the reason they won the first round. Luka vs MJ? Please. Let's talk about that when we actually have a good Luka game in this playoffs. In this playoffs alone, Jalen Brunson > Luka Doncic. Let's not get into that MJ conversation yet. That will be laughable.
Westbrook won his MVP when he was 28, Luka is 25. Also I've not compared Luka to MJ but since you were going on that Luka doesn't have a ring I pointed out that even MJ didn't have one either when he was Luka's age. That's not saying that Luka is as good as MJ or that he will ever be but simply that it is unrealistic to expect rings from Luka at 25 if even the GOAT didn't manage to do it at that age.






