ImageImageImage

Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,879
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#641 » by Archx » Tue May 27, 2025 10:11 am

Mavrelous wrote:Slightly Biased on Locked On Mavs suggested
PJ + Knecht to Cavs
Jarret Allen to Lakers
Reaves to Dallas

I'd even give LAL their pick back, but I like this framework, Reaves is the only player I'd move PJ for.


Hmm, yesterday i was checking Lakers stuff... and there are some weird indications coming from "the back" about Reaves. Apparently he's like Luka, working out mad and plans to come back way stronger and better. And Lakers have hinted they plan to keep him because they'll need someone in that nr2 role after Lebron. So, my best guess is, AR already showed great potential this season and if those reports are true, he could turn himself into borderline all star player next year. Therefore there is no way a single Gaff or PJ package would be enough for him. Lakers would probably want both.
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 18,328
And1: 15,953
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#642 » by Mavrelous » Tue May 27, 2025 10:16 am

Archx wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Slightly Biased on Locked On Mavs suggested
PJ + Knecht to Cavs
Jarret Allen to Lakers
Reaves to Dallas

I'd even give LAL their pick back, but I like this framework, Reaves is the only player I'd move PJ for.


Hmm, yesterday i was checking Lakers stuff... and there are some weird indications coming from "the back" about Reaves. Apparently he's like Luka, working out mad and plans to come back way stronger and better. And Lakers have hinted they plan to keep him because they'll need someone in that nr2 role after Lebron. So, my best guess is, AR already showed great potential this season and if those reports are true, he could turn himself into borderline all star player next year. Therefore there is no way a single Gaff or PJ package would be enough for him. Lakers would probably want both.


Gaff and PJ are totally different valuations for me.
Gafford isn't a significant player in Reaves package, PJ is...
PJ + LAL 1st back is an overpay for Reaves, Lakers should jump on this deal, PJ alone isn't enough, I agree.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
User avatar
41Dirk41
Head Coach
Posts: 6,912
And1: 2,453
Joined: Mar 26, 2021
     

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#643 » by 41Dirk41 » Tue May 27, 2025 10:27 am

Wait... Is this a Fakers forum???

PJ was a fondamental playes in a NBA Finals run, Reaves was a bum in 2 straight POs.
I don't want that soft ass who can't guard a cone. Jordan Poole 2.0
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 18,328
And1: 15,953
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#644 » by Mavrelous » Tue May 27, 2025 10:29 am

41Dirk41 wrote:Wait... Is this a Fakers forum???

PJ was a fondamental playes in a NBA Finals run, Reaves was a bum in 2 straight POs.
I don't want that soft ass who can't guard a cone. Jordan Poole 2.0

This is the trade thread, Mavs need a PG, and have 3 starting PFs.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,879
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#645 » by Archx » Tue May 27, 2025 10:36 am

41Dirk41 wrote:Wait... Is this a Fakers forum???

PJ was a fondamental playes in a NBA Finals run, Reaves was a bum in 2 straight POs.
I don't want that soft ass who can't guard a cone. Jordan Poole 2.0


AR is nothing even remotely close to Poole. You're just a hater if you think that :P

He's been playing amazing when both LBJ and Luka were out but he is weak and lacks muscles, that's why he easily gets pushed around and his defense suffers. And if reports of him wanting to become stronger are true, Mavs would be lucky to have him. Pair him with Flagg as a combo guard/versatile big wing duo and Mavs would be deadly.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,180
And1: 3,786
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#646 » by daoneandonly » Tue May 27, 2025 10:38 am

Archx wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Slightly Biased on Locked On Mavs suggested
PJ + Knecht to Cavs
Jarret Allen to Lakers
Reaves to Dallas

I'd even give LAL their pick back, but I like this framework, Reaves is the only player I'd move PJ for.


Hmm, yesterday i was checking Lakers stuff... and there are some weird indications coming from "the back" about Reaves. Apparently he's like Luka, working out mad and plans to come back way stronger and better. And Lakers have hinted they plan to keep him because they'll need someone in that nr2 role after Lebron. So, my best guess is, AR already showed great potential this season and if those reports are true, he could turn himself into borderline all star player next year. Therefore there is no way a single Gaff or PJ package would be enough for him. Lakers would probably want both.


Did I just read that Luka is working out mad and plans to come back stronger?
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,180
And1: 3,786
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#647 » by daoneandonly » Tue May 27, 2025 10:40 am

I know its not his natural position and we have enough forwards, but I think the Mavs should explore an AD for Jalen Johnson deal. The East is wide open, so the Hawks may want to take a chance on a Trae/Daniels/Rishacher/AD/OO lineup.

The Mavs should then trade Klay or Mann (who they'll need to take back in the deal) for a pass first PG to hold down the fort until Ky returns. But this lineup is huge, young, and promising

Kyrie Irving
Jalen Johnson
Cooper Flagg
PJ Washington
Derrick Lively
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,879
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#648 » by Archx » Tue May 27, 2025 10:44 am

daoneandonly wrote:
Archx wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Slightly Biased on Locked On Mavs suggested
PJ + Knecht to Cavs
Jarret Allen to Lakers
Reaves to Dallas

I'd even give LAL their pick back, but I like this framework, Reaves is the only player I'd move PJ for.


Hmm, yesterday i was checking Lakers stuff... and there are some weird indications coming from "the back" about Reaves. Apparently he's like Luka, working out mad and plans to come back way stronger and better. And Lakers have hinted they plan to keep him because they'll need someone in that nr2 role after Lebron. So, my best guess is, AR already showed great potential this season and if those reports are true, he could turn himself into borderline all star player next year. Therefore there is no way a single Gaff or PJ package would be enough for him. Lakers would probably want both.


Did I just read that Luka is working out mad and plans to come back stronger?


Read on Twitter


This was few days ago at Real Madrid facilities in Spain.

Read on Twitter
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,180
And1: 3,786
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#649 » by daoneandonly » Tue May 27, 2025 10:46 am

Archx wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Archx wrote:
Hmm, yesterday i was checking Lakers stuff... and there are some weird indications coming from "the back" about Reaves. Apparently he's like Luka, working out mad and plans to come back way stronger and better. And Lakers have hinted they plan to keep him because they'll need someone in that nr2 role after Lebron. So, my best guess is, AR already showed great potential this season and if those reports are true, he could turn himself into borderline all star player next year. Therefore there is no way a single Gaff or PJ package would be enough for him. Lakers would probably want both.


Did I just read that Luka is working out mad and plans to come back stronger?


Read on Twitter


This was few days ago at Real Madrid facilities in Spain.

Read on Twitter


SO he's finally motivated? Or is this a case of by the time the season starts, it will be the Luka we all know? I hope the latter
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,879
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#650 » by Archx » Tue May 27, 2025 10:52 am

daoneandonly wrote:SO he's finally motivated? Or is this a case of by the time the season starts, it will be the Luka we all know? I hope the latter


To be fair, he was doing exactly this before his legendary 23/24 season. After that, he had many annoying small injuries. He's now finally healthy and also has time again to prepare. Nico's health staff and Nico being a complete idiot basically never even gave him a real chance. So here we are. He's going to be on a legendary redemption tour next season and Mavs fans will be even more pissed if Flagg doesn't turn out the way people expect him to.
Captain_Obvious
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,811
And1: 990
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#651 » by Captain_Obvious » Tue May 27, 2025 11:16 am

Teffer10 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:I think 99.9% of Mavs personnel and fans would be happy with this strategy considering the good fortune we received on May 12th.

Unfortunately Nico falls in the .1 % group.

I like to see this team attempt to win. Doubt that puts me into the 0.1%.

But this actually pisses me off a bit. Ky gets hurt and by all accounts he is fighting back ahead of schedule. The actual recommendation here is to not resign him now, because "Half of our problems will go away". Didn't see the same posts with Luka repeatedly getting hurt. Maybe you guys are not so far off Nico as you like to think.

I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.
Archx
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,879
Joined: Feb 09, 2018
 

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#652 » by Archx » Tue May 27, 2025 11:30 am

Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:I like to see this team attempt to win. Doubt that puts me into the 0.1%.

But this actually pisses me off a bit. Ky gets hurt and by all accounts he is fighting back ahead of schedule. The actual recommendation here is to not resign him now, because "Half of our problems will go away". Didn't see the same posts with Luka repeatedly getting hurt. Maybe you guys are not so far off Nico as you like to think.

I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.


Mavs are not competing for a ring with a rookie Flagg, that's not going to happen. They'll be competing with AD and Kyrie. But who even trusts these two at this point that they'll be even remotely healthy when the time comes? AD already got hurt twice with his short stint with Mavs...

If you sign both of them on long contracts, that will lower their trade value and will NOT increase it. Teams always look for team friendly contracts not just talent.

But to really go all in and compete for a ring (like Nico said after trading Luka), the most sense would be to trade for Giannis. That's not going to happen, so the next best thing is to load up on draft capital by trading both AD and Kyrie. Mavs draft situation right now is they have 2026 and 2032 to trade. Their future firsts will perfectly align with Flagg growing older and closer to his prime. They did this with Luka but then they F*cked it up in two weeks.
Teffer10
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 1,004
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
     

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#653 » by Teffer10 » Tue May 27, 2025 12:03 pm

Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:I like to see this team attempt to win. Doubt that puts me into the 0.1%.

But this actually pisses me off a bit. Ky gets hurt and by all accounts he is fighting back ahead of schedule. The actual recommendation here is to not resign him now, because "Half of our problems will go away". Didn't see the same posts with Luka repeatedly getting hurt. Maybe you guys are not so far off Nico as you like to think.

I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.

On paper I'm with you but there are a lot of issues that drive my skepticism.

AD is completely unreliable and not worth near the amount we are paying him. We have a guy who might gives us 50 games if we are lucky and he is taking up a tremendous percentage of our cap.

Then there is Kyrie who Nico will need to make the right decision on. Nico gave Kyrie all of the leverage when he traded Luka and had absolutely no plan to make up the offense that he lost. Now Kyrie is broken down and a complete unknown in terms of health, and at 33 is clearly nearing the final few years of his career. And it's not like Kyrie has been an iron man at any point of his career.

Klay...there isnt much to say because is all but washed up.

My main point is that Nico's strategy of trying to win with washed up former superstars is clearly not a good one. He has been completely reckless in trying to build this thing to suit his vision and I'm not sure how anyone could trust that he wont go all out and leverage all of our future assets to satisfy that one burning desire he seems to have. Hell, I'm so cynical that I'm not sure he'll draft Flagg.

I think people forget we got blown out in the play-in by a team that got blown out by OKC. I dont think Kyrie would have made up the difference even if he was 100%.

On paper, yes, we are crazy good but the reality is another thing. I would have no problem if Kyrie walks because he has the potential to have one of the worst contracts in the NBA.
arkuo
General Manager
Posts: 9,609
And1: 2,251
Joined: Jun 16, 2004

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#654 » by arkuo » Tue May 27, 2025 12:21 pm

Teffer10 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.

On paper I'm with you but there are a lot of issues that drive my skepticism.

AD is completely unreliable and not worth near the amount we are paying him. We have a guy who might gives us 50 games if we are lucky and he is taking up a tremendous percentage of our cap.

Then there is Kyrie who Nico will need to make the right decision on. Nico gave Kyrie all of the leverage when he traded Luka and had absolutely no plan to make up the offense that he lost. Now Kyrie is broken down and a complete unknown in terms of health, and at 33 is clearly nearing the final few years of his career. And it's not like Kyrie has been an iron man at any point of his career.

Klay...there isnt much to say because is all but washed up.

My main point is that Nico's strategy of trying to win with washed up former superstars is clearly not a good one. He has been completely reckless in trying to build this thing to suit his vision and I'm not sure how anyone could trust that he wont go all out and leverage all of our future assets to satisfy that one burning desire he seems to have. Hell, I'm so cynical that I'm not sure he'll draft Flagg.

I think people forget we got blown out in the play-in by a team that got blown out by OKC. I dont think Kyrie would have made up the difference even if he was 100%.

On paper, yes, we are crazy good but the reality is another thing. I would have no problem if Kyrie walks because he has the potential to have one of the worst contracts in the NBA.


I think AD played 76 games, or maybe 72 games last year. Then 51 this year. If he can get back to playing in the 70s (including playoff games), I will consider that a plus.

Actually he will be needed in the playoffs. So similar to Kawhi, I have no problem load managing his games during the regular season. Let PJ and Flagg take care of a lot of regular season load. Then have AD come in for games that matter and ideally no back to back games. Injury-prone as he is, you're still not going to leave him open in the playoffs. He will outperform the likes of Randle or KAT. Kawhi's been load managing hard with the Clippers. But i think Kawhi is way older than AD. But the principle is the same. If you're a healthy team with depth in the playoffs, you have a chance to go for a deep run.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,180
And1: 3,786
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#655 » by daoneandonly » Tue May 27, 2025 12:46 pm

Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
arkuo
General Manager
Posts: 9,609
And1: 2,251
Joined: Jun 16, 2004

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#656 » by arkuo » Tue May 27, 2025 1:40 pm




I like that Trae Young idea. But if Dallas is sending out AD, you will likely need to keep Gaff. Sending out both would just leave Lively alone at center. If Lively goes down with another in-season injury, there's your season.
User avatar
41Dirk41
Head Coach
Posts: 6,912
And1: 2,453
Joined: Mar 26, 2021
     

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#657 » by 41Dirk41 » Tue May 27, 2025 6:27 pm

Archx wrote:
41Dirk41 wrote:Wait... Is this a Fakers forum???

PJ was a fondamental playes in a NBA Finals run, Reaves was a bum in 2 straight POs.
I don't want that soft ass who can't guard a cone. Jordan Poole 2.0


AR is nothing even remotely close to Poole. You're just a hater if you think that :P

He's been playing amazing when both LBJ and Luka were out but he is weak and lacks muscles, that's why he easily gets pushed around and his defense suffers. And if reports of him wanting to become stronger are true, Mavs would be lucky to have him. Pair him with Flagg as a combo guard/versatile big wing duo and Mavs would be deadly.


Reaves is not a rookie, he is 27yo and he showed how bad he is playing PO basketball.

I'm happy to read you excited about his RS performance but i would like to have PO players.
User avatar
41Dirk41
Head Coach
Posts: 6,912
And1: 2,453
Joined: Mar 26, 2021
     

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#658 » by 41Dirk41 » Tue May 27, 2025 6:41 pm

Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:I like to see this team attempt to win. Doubt that puts me into the 0.1%.

But this actually pisses me off a bit. Ky gets hurt and by all accounts he is fighting back ahead of schedule. The actual recommendation here is to not resign him now, because "Half of our problems will go away". Didn't see the same posts with Luka repeatedly getting hurt. Maybe you guys are not so far off Nico as you like to think.

I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.


Best job? What? Just because NBA is rigged or we are the most luckier team in the league... Wow what a modified narrative.

Not bad.

Then think about this year 4 conference finals team... Minny, Pacers and Knicks are just mediocre.
Okc is good, but Luka Mavs already beated them.
Captain_Obvious
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,811
And1: 990
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#659 » by Captain_Obvious » Tue May 27, 2025 7:31 pm

41Dirk41 wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.


Best job? What? Just because NBA is rigged or we are the most luckier team in the league... Wow what a modified narrative.

Not bad.

Then think about this year 4 conference finals team... Minny, Pacers and Knicks are just mediocre.
Okc is good, but Luka Mavs already beated them.

Go here: https://build.nvidia.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1

Prompt with:

Code: Select all

Can you explain the assumption part of the following text:

Counterpoints:

We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.

Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.

To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.

Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.


I hope that helps to decipher my text. I think your response is rooted in misunderstanding.
Captain_Obvious
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,811
And1: 990
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Re: Dallas Mavericks 2025 Trade thread -- Roster and Cap 

Post#660 » by Captain_Obvious » Tue May 27, 2025 7:42 pm

Archx wrote:
Captain_Obvious wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:I dont mind winning as long as Nico doesnt sabotage our future in the process.

I think most of us know we have a better chance of winning a championship 5 years from now by building around CF and DL using assets we could yield from moving some of our old and nearly washed up assets than we do relying on AD to play 50 games next season and Kyrie coming back to full strength in a timely manner.

We can be optimistic, but why waste the first few years of Cooper's career and then start over from scratch when he is 22 or 23 when we have some tradeable assets that can get that process started now.

It's obvious Nico will half ass this thing and squander the few assets we could possibly have to get some players in here now to develop with Flagg, Lively and Christie. I think 99.9% of us dont trust Nico to refrain from giving up some of our young players and the few picks we have over the 5 years to chase a championship with Kyrie and AD.

Counterpoints:
  • We have a winning culture in place and actually try to win right away with Coop - how can this be a bad thing for his development? He is getting mentored by all time greats and competes at the top.
  • Our picks after 26 are not in our control - Uncertainty in our team setup would not benefit us after the next draft.
  • To completely align the age of your core comes with drawbacks: You have to pay them top dollar at the same time and it becomes likely you cannot keep the core. I actually think aligning your franchise player with expensive veterans while he is young and with younger talent when he is older is a valid approach.
  • Locking up AD and Kyrie might increase their value esp. during the deadline. Hard disagree we have to sell now-now. Just look at Minny and tell me they wouldn't throw all remaining assets at Ky - esp. if he returns before the deadline.

I share a general distrust of Nico. But we have to have the assumption he is going to do the best job in either direction. There is clearly the worst direction of trading Coop for a win now piece.


Mavs are not competing for a ring with a rookie Flagg, that's not going to happen. They'll be competing with AD and Kyrie. But who even trusts these two at this point that they'll be even remotely healthy when the time comes? AD already got hurt twice with his short stint with Mavs...

If you sign both of them on long contracts, that will lower their trade value and will NOT increase it. Teams always look for team friendly contracts not just talent.

But to really go all in and compete for a ring (like Nico said after trading Luka), the most sense would be to trade for Giannis. That's not going to happen, so the next best thing is to load up on draft capital by trading both AD and Kyrie. Mavs draft situation right now is they have 2026 and 2032 to trade. Their future firsts will perfectly align with Flagg growing older and closer to his prime. They did this with Luka but then they F*cked it up in two weeks.

Nobody is a believer here

This is an opportunity for me :D

Flagg does the Duncan! Heard it here first!

The twin towers v2 has become the triple towers (Coop, AD, DLive) :nod:

Return to Dallas Mavericks