Jg41 wrote:dirkules_41 wrote:Jg41 wrote:Trade w/BKN:
BKN Receives: D. Bertans / J. McGee / '25 Unprotected 1st / '26 Pick Swap / '30 2nd / Full 6.8M Cash Considerations
DAL Receives: D. Finney-Smith / P. Mills / D. Sharpe
That's a crazy bad trade. I get DFS is our guy and we love him but he's gonna be 30 and is a quite limited player. No way you give away an UNPROTECTED 1st and a Pick swap and a 2nd... pure madness.
Bertans will have 1 year at $5m left so offloading his contract isn't relevant value either.
I'm rarely (if ever) antagonistic on this forum, but the ignorance you brandished with your 'UNPROTECTED' in all caps simply has to be addressed: The Mavericks are not able to beneficially protect either of their remaining tradeable picks this decade. For illustration, the reason we couldn't include our 2025 1st in any trades this year is because of the Top-10 protection we put on our 2023 1st owed to New York from the Porzingis trade. If we finished as a bottom 10 team this year, we'd keep our pick and owe them our 2024 1st instead (again Top-10 protected). In the hypothetically unfortunate event we were bottom 10 again the following season, we'd keep our 2024 1st and be forced to convey our 2025 2nd round pick instead. However, under this scenario, if we were to finish in the top 20 next year (after finishing bottom 10 this year), our 2024 pick would have indeed conveyed to NYK - rendering our 2025 1st round pick untradeable per the Stepien Rule which prevents teams from trading their own firsts in back to back years. The mere possibility we'd have to trade our 2024 1st is enough to preclude us from trading our 2025 1st until the 2023 1st is conveyed. This 'potentially conveyable' concept even extends to 2nd rounders. Case in point, leading up to the this year's deadline, our 2025 2nd round pick was (and still is) not legally tradeable because it was still possible for it to one day be owed to NYK. This is the unspoken downside of many of these protection mechanisms.
Say the Mavericks were to top-whatever protect their 2025 1st in some trade this summer. Assuming the league approves this transaction (an unlikely presumption as you'll soon see) if we somehow managed to retain the pick that year, what future pick are you converting it to? If it becomes our 2026 or 2027 picks we will not be able to trade our 2027 pick until the summer of 2025 at the earliest, and that's only if the 2025 1st was conveyed. Moreover, even if a team were to benevolently agree to some distant deferment in order to preserve the Maverick's transactional flexibility, we don't even own a future 2nd round pick the protected pick could convert to until 2030. While a protection on either of our two tradeable picks might be technically possible, it now should be clear that it is not practically beneficial for the team's future maneuverability.
With all that being said, if we set aside the practical and technical reasons why crying over pick protections is absurd, this deal (as I thought I made pretty clear in my original post) is only something I'd consider if and when Kyrie resigns. Obviously if he doesn't, a Dorian reunion is far from the best way we should use that pick. However, if and when Kyrie does resign, our 2025 first immediately loses SIGNIFICANT projected value across the league. Consequently, insisting on even light protection of said pick would not only indicate a gross ignorance of the market on the part of our FO, but it would kill any negotiation for an impact player and could even be read by other teams as dealing in bad faith. Moreover, a swap right in 2026 becomes similarly worthless, and a 2nd round pick in 2030 is ... well ... a 2nd round pick in 2030 ... But, if after this education you still maintain that surrendering such a 'treasure trove' of assets while offloading ~35M in unplayable salary is "pure madness" for 3 players on great contracts that can actually capably fill the roles this roster needs, then Godspeed.
This is far too much text - please highlight the relevant portion where you explain why you're going all in on a heavily romanticized ex-Mav with strong on court limitations. I'm not gonna read the whole novel.

























