Re: RS 23/24 - Mavs vs Pelicans (Mond. 230PMEST)
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:30 pm
If you told the 7 game homestand would end 5-2 I'd be OK with it, but given how things went down, it's a missed opportunity.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2348413
daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
BliscoSantos wrote:daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
Cause the 3 was falling and Lively got the rebounds...when they hit from 3 ,they win.... it's really not that complicated...but how many games will Timmy score 41 with 9 of 15 from three? Or Josh 3 od 5 from three? That's why this team is so bipolar,they live and die by the three.... unfourtunately that means when the shots aren't falling,they really don't have any answer for how to win
Apz wrote:daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
Mavs plays up to or down to the opposition. Easiest way to win vs mavs is rest your best players
dirkules_41 wrote:BliscoSantos wrote:daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
Cause the 3 was falling and Lively got the rebounds...when they hit from 3 ,they win.... it's really not that complicated...but how many games will Timmy score 41 with 9 of 15 from three? Or Josh 3 od 5 from three? That's why this team is so bipolar,they live and die by the three.... unfourtunately that means when the shots aren't falling,they really don't have any answer for how to win
The three is a huge factor but the whole energy was different. They also played Kyrie off ball a lot with Green playing bringing the ball up.
And Lively is just the biggest game changer. We would've not taken that lead in the end without his massive OREBs.
Can you please share this report?BliscoSantos wrote:Good win,but this doesn't change anything...the Players are still too streaky/incosistent and they have too many guards...someone needs to get traded...there are reports Hornets want Josh(maybe some other team too) ,if you can get a pick and an expirings or someone else who's be valuable from a third team ,you need to pull the trigger
ejs78 wrote:Can you please share this report?BliscoSantos wrote:Good win,but this doesn't change anything...the Players are still too streaky/incosistent and they have too many guards...someone needs to get traded...there are reports Hornets want Josh(maybe some other team too) ,if you can get a pick and an expirings or someone else who's be valuable from a third team ,you need to pull the trigger
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
BliscoSantos wrote:ejs78 wrote:Wait for it....Bob and I agree on somethingBob8 wrote:THJ s basically untradable, because Mavs need his points desperately.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
That's why they need to ship Green out while someone still thinks he has an upside
ejs78 wrote:Can you please share this report?BliscoSantos wrote:Good win,but this doesn't change anything...the Players are still too streaky/incosistent and they have too many guards...someone needs to get traded...there are reports Hornets want Josh(maybe some other team too) ,if you can get a pick and an expirings or someone else who's be valuable from a third team ,you need to pull the trigger
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
ThanksBliscoSantos wrote:ejs78 wrote:Can you please share this report?BliscoSantos wrote:Good win,but this doesn't change anything...the Players are still too streaky/incosistent and they have too many guards...someone needs to get traded...there are reports Hornets want Josh(maybe some other team too) ,if you can get a pick and an expirings or someone else who's be valuable from a third team ,you need to pull the trigger
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
https://thesmokingcuban.com/posts/dallas-mavericks-josh-green-listed-as-top-trade-target-for-hornets
BliscoSantos wrote:ejs78 wrote:Can you please share this report?BliscoSantos wrote:Good win,but this doesn't change anything...the Players are still too streaky/incosistent and they have too many guards...someone needs to get traded...there are reports Hornets want Josh(maybe some other team too) ,if you can get a pick and an expirings or someone else who's be valuable from a third team ,you need to pull the trigger
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
https://thesmokingcuban.com/posts/dallas-mavericks-josh-green-listed-as-top-trade-target-for-hornets
ejs78 wrote:ThanksBliscoSantos wrote:ejs78 wrote:Can you please share this report?
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
https://thesmokingcuban.com/posts/dallas-mavericks-josh-green-listed-as-top-trade-target-for-hornets
Makes sense on why the Hornets would want him, but there's no actual rumor of them being interested at this point.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM Forums mobile app
daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
tleikheen wrote:I'm alittle confused on Josh Greens value moneywise in a trade .With his new contract is a 13 million contract attached to his trade value now that January 15th is here. ?
tleikheen wrote:I'm alittle confused on Josh Greens value moneywise in a trade .With his new contract is a 13 million contract attached to his trade value now that January 15th is here. ?
Bob8 wrote:daoneandonly wrote:I mean how do you explain this team? Lose to the Pels without their 3 best players, but beat then when they play.
It's easy, THJ has to score 40+, mostly difficult shots, for Mavs to win.
He has scored efficient 32 against New York too, so there's a pattern.