arkuo wrote:ozwizard8 wrote:Dallas needs to build a team organically with draft/trades etc.
For Dirk years problem was trying to win every year. Instead of piling future assets, FO tried to help the team with short-term moves.
Problems arise when the owner vetoes decisions made by people he hired for the job. The moment Cuban decided to place his proverbial balls on the table and vetoed drafting Giannis and opted to sign vets every year when he sealed Dirk's fate in Dallas. You let the people tasked to do the job, do the job instead of being the smartest guy in the room thinking it's shark tank. He's no Warren Buffet.
Now it's still signing vets with expiring contracts every season until he hits the jackpot. Which would be God knows when.
That's a good point as well. Cuban is not perfect either and he had a role in most of the mistakes.
But I think my point about the potential of the Mavs franchise in the modern NBA is valid. Even if Mavs drafted Giannis, he wouldn't become a star player until Dirk fades. After that Mavs would have Giannis and role players. Similar situation with the current team. It's just not easy to build a contender in today's league. In the last two seasons, we saw a lot of players moving to Los Angeles, New York. Teaming up with other star players brings more benefits for players compared to retiring in the same franchise.
D.Lillard would get more props from public if he won a title with Lakers as 3rd option than what he does currently.
B.Beal snubbed from all-star team, all-NBA teams. Those things make you lose money on the contract. On top of that, you probably get less endorsement, less income from your shoe deals etc.
Ideally, you'd sign players like Seth Curry more often and try to trade them for better assets.
Take bad contracts, players who underperform like THJ for KP was also a good bet. Mavs FO should work on those type of deals if they cannot find good FA signing oppurtunities.