ImageImageImage

Get KIDD via a different route?

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

waverider
Pro Prospect
Posts: 940
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

Get KIDD via a different route? 

Post#1 » by waverider » Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:57 pm

Let say Portland acquired Kidd in a sepatate deal with NJ. Would you guys trade Harris and Stack to POR for Kidd and James Jones?
KVH would be added to fill in required $$$ anmount differential.

You get Kidd AND a great 3 pt threat for him to pass to and open it up more for the other guys.

Note: I believe Kidd can be traded with another player "again" if the trade is done withing 48 hrs.

Any interest? Note, S Rodriguez perhaps could perhaps be added if desired.
User avatar
jwa1107
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Location: i wanna know where da gold at

 

Post#2 » by jwa1107 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 7:02 pm

not that different than the 3way proposals we've seen...
DAL still doesn't do it if the cost is Harris IMHO
waverider
Pro Prospect
Posts: 940
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

 

Post#3 » by waverider » Wed Feb 6, 2008 7:03 pm

jwa1107 wrote:not that different than the 3way proposals we've seen...
DAL still doesn't do it if the cost is Harris IMHO


From what I've seen this proposal costs you less and you get more back? no?
your_dallas_mavericks
Starter
Posts: 2,165
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
Location: Where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain...

 

Post#4 » by your_dallas_mavericks » Wed Feb 6, 2008 7:32 pm

jwa1107 wrote:not that different than the 3way proposals we've seen...
DAL still doesn't do it if the cost is Harris IMHO


Consensus has it that there is no deal if Harris is involved. I agree with the picture man...
If we could just close games with Luka, Kyrie, Green, Maxi, and Wood that'd be great...
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#5 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 8:53 pm

If NJ wants Ben Wallace, Bulls can get involved.

Bulls would not want Harris in return.

NJ was after Shaq, & Ben W is a much cheaper version - and he still plays 40+ minutes in every game.

Hassel + Diop + Stackhouse to Chicago
Wallace + Smith to NJ
Kidd to Dallas


Of course, if NJ doesnt want Wallace then the deal fails.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#6 » by catalyst » Wed Feb 6, 2008 9:17 pm

I cannot see why NJ would want Wallace if they are to tear down. I like this version for dal the most.
Teffer10
Head Coach
Posts: 6,858
And1: 845
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
     

 

Post#7 » by Teffer10 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 10:52 pm

Dallas should just wait until the last minute of the TDL and offer KVH, Hassell, Ager, and Barea for Kidd.
User avatar
Pointguard01
RealGM
Posts: 12,854
And1: 223
Joined: Jun 07, 2004

 

Post#8 » by Pointguard01 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:06 pm

lol no one really wants Ben Wallace with 3 yrs and 45 millionleft on his contract.

and no, we dont want to give Harris for Kidd. sorry.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,846
And1: 122
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#9 » by JES12 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:28 pm

Image

Just had to bark at losing Harris for Kidd.

I have to post something on every Kidd to Dallas thread where we lose Harris so people can read my sig!
User avatar
jwa1107
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Location: i wanna know where da gold at

 

Post#10 » by jwa1107 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:36 pm

Teffer10 wrote:Dallas should just wait until the last minute of the TDL and offer KVH, Hassell, Ager, and Barea for Kidd.


Brilliant!
FGump
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,050
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 14, 2004

Re: Get KIDD via a different route? 

Post#11 » by FGump » Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:50 pm

waverider wrote:
Note: I believe Kidd can be traded with another player "again" if the trade is done withing 48 hrs.
.


No you can't.
dirkforpres
RealGM
Posts: 11,897
And1: 7,814
Joined: Sep 13, 2005
   

 

Post#12 » by dirkforpres » Thu Feb 7, 2008 1:51 am

No... If Harris has to be involved to get Kidd here, you can keep him, we dont need a trade that bad.
FIRE JASON KIDD
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 13,346
And1: 823
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

 

Post#13 » by Darren » Thu Feb 7, 2008 2:05 am

bulls6 wrote:If NJ wants Ben Wallace, Bulls can get involved.

Bulls would not want Harris in return.

NJ was after Shaq, & Ben W is a much cheaper version - and he still plays 40+ minutes in every game.

Hassel + Diop + Stackhouse to Chicago
Wallace + Smith to NJ
Kidd to Dallas


Of course, if NJ doesnt want Wallace then the deal fails.


:bowdown:
Deus
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 149
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
       

 

Post#14 » by Deus » Thu Feb 7, 2008 6:08 pm

your_dallas_mavericks wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Consensus has it that there is no deal if Harris is involved. I agree with the picture man...


I was listening to Marc Stein on ESPN radio yesterday and he said its not Devin that the Mavs refuse to trade, its Brandon Bass or Diop.

I think they refuse to trade Bass because of his potential to turn into a tremendous inside force. Something the Mavs never had until he showed.

Diop because he's the Duncanator.
your_dallas_mavericks
Starter
Posts: 2,165
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
Location: Where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain...

 

Post#15 » by your_dallas_mavericks » Thu Feb 7, 2008 6:15 pm

^^ Duncanator LOL! That's funny but true.
If we could just close games with Luka, Kyrie, Green, Maxi, and Wood that'd be great...
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,846
And1: 122
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#16 » by JES12 » Thu Feb 7, 2008 6:53 pm

scramm wrote:I was listening to Marc Stein on ESPN radio yesterday and he said its not Devin that the Mavs refuse to trade, its Brandon Bass or Diop.
I take things from Stien with a grain of salt, but the way that it was released was that Dallas was iffy on Harris for Kidd and adding more "real value" (hence, not Stack) was just too much.

Return to Dallas Mavericks