Hey Cuban! Hey Thorn! Here is the solution!

JKiddy · Post #1 » by **JKiddy** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:09 am

Trade ID #4511044

New Jersey Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +5.5 ppg, -0.4 rpg, and -4.5 apg.
Incoming Players
Erick Dampier
6-11 C from Mississippi State
5.5 ppg, 7.0 rpg, 0.9 apg in 22.8 minutes
Devin Harris
6-3 PG from Wisconsin
14.4 ppg, 2.3 rpg, 5.3 apg in 30.4 minutes
Maurice Ager
6-5 SG from Michigan State
1.3 ppg, 0.3 rpg, 0.3 apg in 6.4 minutes
Nick Fazekas
6-11 PF from Nevada
1.0 ppg, 0.8 rpg, 0.0 apg in 2.3 minutes
Outgoing Players
Jason Kidd
6-4 PG from California
11.3 ppg, 8.1 rpg, 10.4 apg in 37.1 minutes
Malik Allen
6-10 PF from Villanova
5.4 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 0.6 apg in 15.9 minutes

Dallas Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -5.5 ppg, +0.4 rpg, and +4.5 apg.
Incoming Players
Jason Kidd
6-4 PG from California
11.3 ppg, 8.1 rpg, 10.4 apg in 37.1 minutes
Malik Allen
6-10 PF from Villanova
5.4 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 0.6 apg in 15.9 minutes
Outgoing Players
Erick Dampier
6-11 C from Mississippi State
5.5 ppg, 7.0 rpg, 0.9 apg in 22.8 minutes
Devin Harris
6-3 PG from Wisconsin
14.4 ppg, 2.3 rpg, 5.3 apg in 30.4 minutes
Maurice Ager
6-5 SG from Michigan State
1.3 ppg, 0.3 rpg, 0.3 apg in 6.4 minutes
Nick Fazekas
6-11 PF from Nevada
1.0 ppg, 0.8 rpg, 0.0 apg in 2.3 minutes

This solves the problems with George and Stackhouse.

What do you guys think??

JES12 · Post #2 » by **JES12** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:24 am

I doubt they give up Dampier if they are unwilling to give up Stack.

I also doubt NJ takes Dampier.

Pootie41 · Post #3 » by **Pootie41** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:43 am

If JES12 syas it won't be done you can take that to the bank. Lord knows he's an expert. Just look at his posting history. LOL

Teddy KGB · Post #4 » by **Teddy KGB** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:12 am

I disagree with a lot that JES says but his posting history is a hell of a lot better than yours.

Rand10 · Post #5 » by **Rand10** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:41 pm

I'd rather lose Stack than lose Dampier.

dirkforpres · Post #6 » by **dirkforpres** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:30 pm

So New Jersey gives up the same things for a lot less? I highly doubt it.

Da big3 · Post #7 » by **Da big3** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:03 pm

Dampier s contract to long and overpaid

chuckerz · Post #8 » by **chuckerz** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:26 pm

well if NJ was going to buy out stackhouses contract, why not do it for Dampier???

Teffer10 · Post #9 » by **Teffer10** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:39 am

chuckerz wrote:well if NJ was going to buy out stackhouses contract, why not do it for Dampier???

My thoughts exactly. In fact, why couldn't they do that with any player? Send Terry in place of Stack and if we don't get him back...who cares?

Rand10 · Post #10 » by **Rand10** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:45 am

chuckerz wrote:well if NJ was going to buy out stackhouses contract, why not do it for Dampier???

Because he makes a lot more money than Stackhouse. NJ would have to pay more to buy him out. It would hurt Dallas if we didn't have Dampier for 30 days more than it would hurt to be without Stack. Then what if the league decides this was another wink-wink deal and he can't come back?

My thoughts exactly. In fact, why couldn't they do that with any player? Send Terry in place of Stack and if we don't get him back...who cares?

Yeah, let's just throw away our players for nothing.