Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dumping Nash
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:59 am
THINK ABOUT THIS:
Kidd makes 19,728,000 this year and 21,372,000 next year.
Nash makes: 11,375,000 and 12,250,000 next year with a team option on Nash for 13,125,000
With Dallas far over the luxury tax this year and more than likely far over the luxury tax next year a Dallas will have to pay around $16,706,000 more than Nash's salary with lux tax included this year and probably $16,494,000 next year.
This totals: $33,200,000 more in money spent on Kidd in these two years alone than Nash would have cost with lux tax included.
This $33,200,000 more that you are paying Kidd with lux tax included than Nash's salary with lux tax included would have paid for Nash's salary the past 3 years....
I'm not trying to kick a team while they're down, but Kidd sucked on the court today while Nash is still playing solid bball. Of all the times Cuban chose to be cheap, you gotta wonder why he chose to be cheap with Nash. I mean the guy's paying Dampier almost as much as Nash!
Kidd makes 19,728,000 this year and 21,372,000 next year.
Nash makes: 11,375,000 and 12,250,000 next year with a team option on Nash for 13,125,000
With Dallas far over the luxury tax this year and more than likely far over the luxury tax next year a Dallas will have to pay around $16,706,000 more than Nash's salary with lux tax included this year and probably $16,494,000 next year.
This totals: $33,200,000 more in money spent on Kidd in these two years alone than Nash would have cost with lux tax included.
This $33,200,000 more that you are paying Kidd with lux tax included than Nash's salary with lux tax included would have paid for Nash's salary the past 3 years....
I'm not trying to kick a team while they're down, but Kidd sucked on the court today while Nash is still playing solid bball. Of all the times Cuban chose to be cheap, you gotta wonder why he chose to be cheap with Nash. I mean the guy's paying Dampier almost as much as Nash!