Here's two more trades to be attacked by the masses...

[your_dallas_mavericks]

Trade #1:

To Dallas:
SG Michael Redd
PF Charlie Villanueva
PG Ramon Sessions

To Milwaukee:
GF Josh Howard
GF Jerry Stackhouse
GF Eddie Jones
FC Brandon Bass

Trade #2:

To Dallas:
F Mike Dunleavy
GF Marquis Daniels
FC Jeff Foster

To Indiana:
C Erick Dampier
G Jason "The JET" Terry

Dallas' Roster:
Kidd/Sessions/Barea
Redd/Daniels/2nd Round Pick
Dunleavy/George/Wright
Dirk/Villanueva/M. Allen
Foster/Diop/Magloire

Barea, George, Wright, M. Allen, Diop, and Magloire are all FA and would all have to be signed.

This team looks quite formidable with a strong 10 man rotation...

That's all. My trade hat has been thrown into the ring!

[mavsfoty]

I stand by my reasoning that Howard for Redd isn't a sound trade. We don't need another jumpshooter. Terry for Redd makes more sense.

A starting 5 of Kidd, Redd, Howard, Dirk, and Damp is very solid.

Pacers laugh at the second trade.

[Teffer10]

I stand by my reasoning that Howard for Redd isn't a sound trade. We don't need another jumpshooter. Terry for Redd makes more sense.

A starting 5 of Kidd, Redd, Howard, Dirk, and Damp is very solid.

Pacers laugh at the second trade.

Terry for Redd wouldn't cut it but Stack, Wright and Bass for Redd might have a better chance.

I do like that starting 5 because Redd would more than makeup for Kidd's lack of offense.
I'd even consider a subsequent trade of Terry/Howard for Marion.

Kidd/Redd/Marion/Dirk/Damp is also very solid and makes us even better defensively. The bench would be a mess though.

[mavsfoty]

I wasn't implying a Terry for Redd straight up. I'm just saying a trade with Terry for Redd as the main components is far better in my mind.

[Captain_Obvious]

We don't need another jumpshooter.

I hate this proposed deal but i have to disagree here. I think this team needs more good shooters alongside Kidd and not just Dirk and Jet. Josh is too streaky at times.

If i trade Josh for Redd, i want a decent SG to come with him back. Parker from Tor would be an option but maybe hes too old idk. And i dont want to downgrade from Bass to Villa. Villa has more upside, but Bass has the right skillset for this team.

Other than this i would love to make a Stack for Nocioni straight up trade. Chi may be looking to shed themself of some big contracts for their fortunate rebuild through the draft. They need some money to make resignings possible.

[Teffer10]

I wasn't implying a Terry for Redd straight up. I'm just saying a trade with Terry for Redd as the main components is far better in my mind.

I didn't think so but I actually meant that the Bucks would probably be looking more at youth and a better contract instead of Terry. I'm not sure what interest they would have in Terry because he is just a short and older version of Redd.
Terry and Bass might get it done though. I'd definitely make that trade if it was available.

[mavsfoty]

I hate this proposed deal but i have to disagree here. I think this team needs more good shooters alongside Kidd and not just Dirk and Jet. Josh is too streaky at times.

I agree to an extent. I like Redd (see attached sig) but Redd for Josh is a gamble. While a damn good shooter Redd gives up a lot on the defensive end and isn't much of a slasher. Howard (if he can get his head right) is a better compliment to Kidd and the proposed motion offense of Carlise.

Of course I say all this and think Redd could be a Rip Hamilton like player under RC.

Man I want to see some stuff start happening. Finals end all ready.

[Pointguard01]

Milwaukee has NO interest in Jason Terry. They already have a guy named Moe Williams who is basically a younger, better version of Jason Terry. And they have a backup PG in Ramon Sessions who looks pretty good with potential. They wont take on his contract.

[JES12]

Trade 1 I would not do even with Bass removed. This Sessions kidd had a Marquis Daniels type stretch and I'm not toatally convinced on him yet. Charlie V does not make up the difference btwn Howard & Redd.

Trade 2 would never happen as Dunleavy ~ Terry. I would love that straight up trade to go down because they have Granger & Williams at the SF spot and need a PG. We, on the other hand need another swing. But Indy fans have already rejected that trade so many times on the trade forum. Foster ~ Dampier, but Dampier is paid much, much more. Adding the extra year of terry to Dunleavy and the extra year of Damp to Marquis & Foster would be an automatic no from Indy.

[your_dallas_mavericks]

Thanks for the input everyone!