RealGM

I think Matt Barnes would fit in well with this team he brings offense and defense and can run the floor well what do you guys think about him?

id have taken hiim last year. at least this year hell be cheaper. he had the momentum of the Mavs/GS series to drive his value up and he still couldnt get the full MLE. I dont think he was nearly as productive this year so he shold come for around 3 mill or so. i'd think. and i'd take him for that.

Well, it would hinder our team from having Reyshawn Terry being able to get some shine this year, but I like Barnes, I live in the Bay Area, and I like what he brings to the table, I prefer Pietrus, but Barnes would be good (off the bench, not starting).

Matt Barnes is better than Mike. I don't think he would come cheap. I take a sign and trade for expiring and pick(s).

I love Matt Barnes as a backup. He brings everything you need in a backup 3 and would contribute extremely well. This move would solidify our 3 and would leave us with a very solid 3 4 and 5. yes it would hinder r terry's time but maybe we could sign barnes and not sign George which i am not a big fan of and play r terry bihind barnes. I don't see this happening but anywayys, i would LOVE to see Barnes here.

I don't see Matt Barnes being a big need for us right now. I'd still like for us to add more size and stop focusing on shooters when we already have that area filled.

I would take Barnes over George if we could sign him to a minimum contract. If it takes part of the MLE and 3 or 4 years to get him here though, I'll pass.

Rand10 wrote:I would take Barnes over George if we could sign him to a minimum contract. If it takes part of the MLE and 3 or 4 years to get him here though, I'll pass.

My thoughts exactly.

Rand10 wrote:I would take Barnes over George if we could sign him to a minimum contract. If it takes part of the MLE and 3 or 4 years to get him here though, I'll pass.

word