ImageImageImage

Earl Watson

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

creative1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,777
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 28, 2004

Earl Watson 

Post#1 » by creative1 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 11:07 pm

I read that OKC is going to be active with trades this summer... so I'm wondering if we can somehow get Watson from them. I've been interested in him for a long time as a back-up and his defensive prowess would seem to match well with Kidd. I've seen mentions of Ridnour being available but it seems to me that Watson would be moved first as Westbrook will now be the defending PG.

I definitely don't think JJB is ready to be our back-up. He's a smaller, less talented Terry if you ask me. Is there anything we could offer them that they might bite on?
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#2 » by JES12 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 11:18 pm

Jason Terry was fine as our #1 PG in 2006 and will be better as our #2 than Watson or Ridnour.

I know some people here think he is a 2, but Terry is just not all that at the 2 and MUCH....MUCH better at the 1 than he will ever be at the 2.

Unless you are trading Terry or Kidd, any asset traded for a PG is a wasted asset as we just don't have enough minutes at the 1 to share with Terry, Kidd and Barea (much the same last year with Harris, Terry, Barea). PG is not a weak spot!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
cmavswin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,213
And1: 222
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#3 » by cmavswin » Mon Jul 7, 2008 11:43 pm

Ya Earl Watson is really going to want to come here and be the backup to Kidd. Since he does not like being the backup in Sea/OKC.
dtownmavs41
Sophomore
Posts: 137
And1: 0
Joined: May 21, 2008

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#4 » by dtownmavs41 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 12:49 am

There is a difference backing up Ridnour than Kidd and there is a difference being a backup for the worst team in the NBA. I'm not saying that I want Watson but I'm sure he would love to leave Seattle for Dallas.
User avatar
cmavswin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,213
And1: 222
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#5 » by cmavswin » Tue Jul 8, 2008 2:42 am

Meanwhile a guy that the Mavs are paying $9 mil+ does what if Watson comes here? Terry playing shooting guard? Right!?!?! This team has 3 PG's they don't need to add another $6+ mil dollar one.
dirkforpres
RealGM
Posts: 12,020
And1: 7,967
Joined: Sep 13, 2005
   

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#6 » by dirkforpres » Tue Jul 8, 2008 5:25 am

Seattle is short on talent. I dont want anyone outside of the players theyve drafted in past 2 years from them.
User avatar
italy_23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,686
And1: 8
Joined: Feb 21, 2003
Location: italy
   

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#7 » by italy_23 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 6:40 am

no more pointguards for this team. we are set at that position. kidd will eat most minutes, the few that are left are going to the JET. in case of emergency we have barea
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,074
And1: 912
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#8 » by Darren » Tue Jul 8, 2008 8:51 am

Earl Watson would be the best defensive PG. But I doubt if Cuban gives up on J-Kidd so early.
User avatar
italy_23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,686
And1: 8
Joined: Feb 21, 2003
Location: italy
   

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#9 » by italy_23 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 8:59 am

what? watson in the place of jkidd?!
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,074
And1: 912
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#10 » by Darren » Tue Jul 8, 2008 9:43 am

I mean we trade Kidd for something.
User avatar
italy_23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,686
And1: 8
Joined: Feb 21, 2003
Location: italy
   

Re: Earl Watson 

Post#11 » by italy_23 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 9:52 am

I wouldnt want watson as the starting pg on this team

Return to Dallas Mavericks