Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- Junior
- Posts: 331
- And1: 355
- Joined: Dec 05, 2014
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Raider917
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,700
- And1: 770
- Joined: Apr 14, 2009
- Location: Nova Scotia
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
will the pitching get better in the next few years? i cant see it. having this offense is just a waste
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Corinne
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 2,656
- Joined: Dec 30, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Looks like another pitching collapse as usual. Let me go start planning my errands for the afternoon
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,074
- And1: 60,892
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Raider917 wrote:will the pitching get better in the next few years? i cant see it. having this offense is just a waste
No. We need trades.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,266
- And1: 2,806
- Joined: Apr 23, 2012
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Asianiac_24 wrote:Would Kirk be enough to get a #1 pitcher player back? If Montoyo is going to only play our 900+ OPS catcher every other day, might as well trade him
People on this board will crucify me for saying this- I just had a conversation with someone before the game how Kirk's value is at an all-time high. He is under control for 4 more years. He without question can bring back a Legitmate Number 1 Pitcher back in a deal, or two extremely talented Star Bullpen arms. The return he will bring should be impressive in any deal.
With Jansen coming back soon, and Moreno showing he is MLB ready, we eventually have to deal one of our Catchers. I mentioned previously how this team should only look at trading Jansen. However, the more I think about it, Kirk's value is at an all-time high and would bring a greater return than Jansen. Shapiro/Atkins should explore what return he can potentially bring right now to significantly address our Pitching needs.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- BramptonYute
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,847
- And1: 8,677
- Joined: Mar 14, 2013
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
They should trade jansen and keep the living legend
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,395
- And1: 5,715
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Was that three times we had the bases loaded with one out, and couldn't cash anything in?
Yikes. Just yikes. We need to do better.
Yikes. Just yikes. We need to do better.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,981
- And1: 21,501
- Joined: May 22, 2019
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Trade Kirk if you forgot how Jansen hitting .200 for a whole season feels like
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,074
- And1: 60,892
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Mehar wrote:Asianiac_24 wrote:Would Kirk be enough to get a #1 pitcher player back? If Montoyo is going to only play our 900+ OPS catcher every other day, might as well trade him
People on this board will crucify me for saying this- I just had a conversation with someone before the game how Kirk's value is at an all-time high. He is under control for 4 more years. He without question can bring back a Legitmate Number 1 Pitcher back in a deal, or two extremely talented Star Bullpen arms. The return he will bring should be impressive in any deal.
With Jansen coming back soon, and Moreno showing he is MLB ready, we eventually have to deal one of our Catchers. I mentioned previously how this team should only look at trading Jansen. However, the more I think about it, Kirk's value is at an all-time high and would bring a greater return than Jansen. Shapiro/Atkins should explore what return he can potentially bring right now to significantly address our Pitching needs.
I'm fine with trading Kirk for an elite arm. He's amazing, but we don't need him right now, or for the foreseeable future. This team needs pitching if they want to contend.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
- Hottie McShotty
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,858
- And1: 2,285
- Joined: Mar 09, 2021
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Pitching sucked but how many men were left on base today?
This team is too good to be mediocre at this point. I think it's time we fired the manager and replaced the coaching staff.
This team is too good to be mediocre at this point. I think it's time we fired the manager and replaced the coaching staff.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,981
- And1: 21,501
- Joined: May 22, 2019
-
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
Raps in 4 wrote:Mehar wrote:Asianiac_24 wrote:Would Kirk be enough to get a #1 pitcher player back? If Montoyo is going to only play our 900+ OPS catcher every other day, might as well trade him
People on this board will crucify me for saying this- I just had a conversation with someone before the game how Kirk's value is at an all-time high. He is under control for 4 more years. He without question can bring back a Legitmate Number 1 Pitcher back in a deal, or two extremely talented Star Bullpen arms. The return he will bring should be impressive in any deal.
With Jansen coming back soon, and Moreno showing he is MLB ready, we eventually have to deal one of our Catchers. I mentioned previously how this team should only look at trading Jansen. However, the more I think about it, Kirk's value is at an all-time high and would bring a greater return than Jansen. Shapiro/Atkins should explore what return he can potentially bring right now to significantly address our Pitching needs.
I'm fine with trading Kirk for an elite arm. He's amazing, but we don't need him right now, or for the foreseeable future. This team needs pitching if they want to contend.
What if we hadn't traded for Berrios last season and now we make a Kirk for Berrios trade while Berrios is still performing at his career standard of top of the rotation SP - then the 2022 BJ's Berrios show up and get lit like a pinball.
The point I'm making is that starting pitching has much higher variance in performance than a 2-way positional player. We are near the peak of the competitive cycle - where we want to minimize variance of performance and even small incremental improvements can have big impact on wins.
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,312
- And1: 3,013
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
-
- Junior
- Posts: 465
- And1: 228
- Joined: Mar 03, 2014
Re: Jays (42-33) vs Rays (40-34) - June 30 to July 3
If anyone bet on the outcome of this 5 game series, I think none would have chosen wins with Kikuchi and Berrios and losses with Gausman and the rest.
But that is on bad luck (with Gausman), somewhat mediocre hitting in the last 3 games and an absolute foolish decision for who gets to start game 4.
How anyone can look at Hatch's #s in triple A and choose him over Castillo is beyond me. I keep repeating it because I still can't believe it.
But that is on bad luck (with Gausman), somewhat mediocre hitting in the last 3 games and an absolute foolish decision for who gets to start game 4.
How anyone can look at Hatch's #s in triple A and choose him over Castillo is beyond me. I keep repeating it because I still can't believe it.