ImageImageImageImageImage

Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation?

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
LittleOzzy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,033
And1: 4,198
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
       

Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#1 » by LittleOzzy » Wed Jan 6, 2010 6:02 pm

With the Jays lacking experienced starting pitching for 2010, are they giving any thought to using Tallet as a starter again?
-- Scott B., Thunder Bay, Ontario

Due to injuries and a lack of depth, Tallet made 25 starts for the Blue Jays last season. This spring, the lefty will likely enter camp as a reliever -- the role he's known for the bulk of his big league career. Should anything go wrong in the rotation, though, Toronto knows it has the flexibility to use the versatile Tallet as a spot starter. As things currently stand, it's unlikely that Tallet would be in the Opening Day rotation.


http://toronto.bluejays.mlb.com/news/ar ... p&c_id=tor
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,794
And1: 101
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#2 » by Relentless88 » Wed Jan 6, 2010 6:11 pm

I hope not. Rather have the young guys pitch.
LBJSeizedMyID
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 96
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#3 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Wed Jan 6, 2010 6:46 pm

Won't happen unless it's a spot start or emergency start. Jays are in rebuild mode, so they'll need to throw the kids out there, unless they somehow all show they really aren't ready for the big show.
OldNo7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,998
And1: 65
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
       

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#4 » by OldNo7 » Wed Jan 6, 2010 6:50 pm

No. /thread
Twitter: @NickObergan
User avatar
ansoncarter
Head Coach
Posts: 6,152
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#5 » by ansoncarter » Wed Jan 6, 2010 7:09 pm

starting to get into baseball again and was wondering if anyone knew the right stats to look at

guessing there are better ones now than 'era'

same for hitters. Is ops the best overall stat? what are the drawbacks, like maybe it favors power hitters or something

thanks in advance if anyone takes the time
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#6 » by Nolan » Wed Jan 6, 2010 7:20 pm

I really hope not. I'm okay with him being an emergency or spot starter but I definitely don't want him in the rotation.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#7 » by The_Hater » Wed Jan 6, 2010 7:28 pm

Even if you have a solid rotation they say that every team should have at least 8 MLB quality starters ready on a moments notice due to injuries and ineffectiveness. And with all the injury prone starters and uncertain young guys on the Jays, we'll probably need at least 10 if not more.

So while I wouldn't expect to see Tallet in the rotation come April, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he got a few starts again this season.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
User avatar
LieCheatSteal
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,891
And1: 418
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Location: Philadelphia via Toronto

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#8 » by LieCheatSteal » Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:59 pm

Tallet will probably handle long relief with Hayhurst or Zancola with the occasional emergency start if the starter goes down last minute. That's his role until Downs gets traded. Then, he'll be the situational lefty.

In other words, Tallet won't be a permanent starter next year. If any of Romero/Richmond/Rzep/Morrow/Cecil go down, there will be Purcey, Ray, Mills or Drabek next in line. Let's not forget Litsch, Marcum and McGowan are due back sometime in 2010 too.
Two years from being two years away.
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#9 » by Modern_epic » Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:34 pm

ansoncarter wrote:starting to get into baseball again and was wondering if anyone knew the right stats to look at

guessing there are better ones now than 'era'

same for hitters. Is ops the best overall stat? what are the drawbacks, like maybe it favors power hitters or something

thanks in advance if anyone takes the time


If you need a composite stat for pitchers, I recommend FIP. Nothing about pitching is that simple, but it attempts to tell the story of what pitcher would do with average fielders. Looking at stats like WHIP, K/9, BB/9 or HR/9 all together can also get you a good picture..

OPS has a problem where it basically favours avg over OBP. A single, counted through both obp and slg, gets double the weight of a walk in OPS, while the actual value of the difference is figured to be more like 1.2 times. Despite that, if you use OPS+ (found on baseball reference), it is still a really good stat. OPS+ normalizes for parks, and normalizes to league average. So a player with 100 OPS+ is a league average hitter, as long as he is in a league average park.

Runs created (found on fangraphs) is a really good measure for hitters, though kind of hard to understand/quickly interpret. RC+ is to runs created as OPS+ is to OPS.
User avatar
ansoncarter
Head Coach
Posts: 6,152
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#10 » by ansoncarter » Wed Jan 6, 2010 10:26 pm

thanks M.E.

starting to get hooked again, mostly from the stats stuff. Thanks to the halladay trade and reading up on prospects from all the organizations (ours seem mostly meh. Plus the guys we got from halladay are sort of meh. Wish we'd forcussed on getting one amazing prospect instead of 3 good ones)

and reading up on our team, kind of surprised by Aaron Hills ops and ops plus. Thought he was an elite bat but he's kind of ordinary (compared to elite hitters, not other second baseman)
User avatar
youngLion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,207
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Location: Toronto

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#11 » by youngLion » Wed Jan 6, 2010 10:56 pm

I'm kind of surprised that Tallet made it to 25 starts, and I'd be even more surprised if he got there again. Moreso than last year, this season is about giving ABs to the young arms to see what the team has. I think he'll be that sport starter type of guy along with Richmond, but considering how many young arms this team has, you could argue that every start one of those guys makes is a lost opportunity for player development.
Image
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#12 » by Modern_epic » Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:37 pm

ansoncarter wrote:thanks M.E.

starting to get hooked again, mostly from the stats stuff. Thanks to the halladay trade and reading up on prospects from all the organizations (ours seem mostly meh. Plus the guys we got from halladay are sort of meh. Wish we'd forcussed on getting one amazing prospect instead of 3 good ones)

and reading up on our team, kind of surprised by Aaron Hills ops and ops plus. Thought he was an elite bat but he's kind of ordinary (compared to elite hitters, not other second baseman)


Well there's your problem right there. Pedroia won the AL MVP in 2008 with a 122 OPS+. You can't compare the hitting of middle infielders with the hitting of people who field like Grimace would.
User avatar
ansoncarter
Head Coach
Posts: 6,152
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#13 » by ansoncarter » Thu Jan 7, 2010 1:48 am

I meant I thought his bat was elite regardless of position. I read about him in the papers last year and they made him sound like he was one of the best hitters in the league

and he was near tops in home runs in the american league whenever I looked at it, so figured he was a freak. But he just a freak for a 2nd baseman. Which is awesome but not truly freaky
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#14 » by Modern_epic » Thu Jan 7, 2010 3:29 am

Ya, Hill is simply a very good 2nd base. His homers are likely a bit of an illusion, as he had the same total number of extra base hits two years back. Some of those will almost certainly go back to being doubles next year. He also doesn't walk quite as much as you would like. But he should continue to be a top six or eight 2b for the length of his contract. Given that 2b is probably the deepest position in the league right now, that's pretty good.
CrymeTime
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 265
Joined: Jan 11, 2010

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#15 » by CrymeTime » Fri Jan 15, 2010 1:03 am

Tallet is the perfect Middle Relief pitcher. (Well, for us)

Romero
Marcum
Litsch
Morrow
McGowan

Also, have Mills, Cecil ready to go incase something happens
MGD24
Starter
Posts: 2,360
And1: 47
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Location: Guelph
Contact:

Re: Should Tallet be included in the starting rotation? 

Post#16 » by MGD24 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:35 am

OldNo7 wrote:No. /thread


+1

Return to Toronto Blue Jays