ImageImageImageImageImage

Agents don't like Lind's deal

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
youngLion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,207
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Location: Toronto

Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#1 » by youngLion » Wed Apr 7, 2010 12:52 am

Link

Scroll about 3/4 of the way down for the story.

Not surprisingly, rival agents are exasperated with the four-year, $18 million contract that designated hitter Adam Lind signed with the Blue Jays, mostly because Lind agreed to club options covering each of his first three free-agent years.

“Three club options? The union hates those deals and understandably so,” one agent said. “He should have gotten those numbers without the options. The arbitration process rewards offensive production, and this kid is going to produce.”


As Rosenthal points out, it's hard to complain about signing a deal that means you and your family will never have to worry about money again, but it does look like the Blue Jays are getting good value.
Image
CrymeTime
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 265
Joined: Jan 11, 2010

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#2 » by CrymeTime » Wed Apr 7, 2010 4:19 pm

At that price, it's a steal.
User avatar
Attonitus
Senior
Posts: 621
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
     

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#3 » by Attonitus » Fri Apr 9, 2010 4:50 am

aren't those options like 7 million a year or something? it's still a good deal for us but he will get paid in the option years, hopefully he is a perrenial all-star by then and a still a steal.
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,794
And1: 101
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#4 » by Relentless88 » Fri Apr 9, 2010 4:56 am

Attonitus wrote:aren't those options like 7 million a year or something? it's still a good deal for us but he will get paid in the option years, hopefully he is a perrenial all-star by then and a still a steal.

If he's not worth the 7 mil we just decline the option, and maybe re-sign him for less?
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,546
And1: 13,127
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#5 » by SharoneWright » Fri Apr 9, 2010 4:58 am

Image
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
Alfred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,350
And1: 20,853
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
 

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#6 » by Alfred » Fri Apr 9, 2010 4:20 pm

You gotta love a deal that the union complains about.
Image
Hoopstarr
RealGM
Posts: 22,285
And1: 10,312
Joined: Feb 21, 2006
     

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#7 » by Hoopstarr » Fri Apr 9, 2010 4:34 pm

Why are they complaining now and not after the Rays practically robbed Longoria, Shields, and Crawford with ridiculously team-friendly contracts? SIX years and 17.5 million for Longoria PLUS 3 team options. Jame Shields for 4/11.25 million plus 3 team options. Crawford for 4/15.25 plus two team options. AA is just taking advantage of the precedent.
User avatar
kelso
Analyst
Posts: 3,549
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2001
Location: Innisfil ON...the centre of the Universe

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#8 » by kelso » Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:22 am

Agreed.

Thats a fantastic contract for AA to get. Add that to the manageable deal signed by Hill and thats 60+ hrs and 200+ RBIs on the cheap IMO.
kavan
General Manager
Posts: 9,451
And1: 91
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
Location: Toronto
         

Re: Agents don't like Lind's deal 

Post#9 » by kavan » Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:38 pm

Why is the union mad we only made Vernon one of the top 10 richest contracts in baseball. I think after his production we have entitled to pay a few players nothing to produce. Maybe by then we can win and spend a bit more.
Raptors, Leafs, Jays. #Toronto

Return to Toronto Blue Jays