ImageImageImageImageImage

John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End)

Moderator: JaysRule15

John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End)

10
1
2%
9
1
2%
8
5
11%
7
4
9%
6
10
22%
5
10
22%
4
5
11%
3
6
13%
2
1
2%
1
3
7%
 
Total votes: 46

User avatar
LittleOzzy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,033
And1: 4,198
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
       

John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#1 » by LittleOzzy » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:03 pm

Image

John Farrell's first season in Toronto was filled with plenty of ups and downs, but it also provided some strong building blocks for the future.

The rookie manager guided his team to an 81-81 record despite a roster that had to deal with more than its fair share of injuries and seemed to be in a constant state of flux.

Farrell's managerial debut campaign ended on a positive note with a ninth-inning comeback in a 3-2 victory Wednesday over the White Sox at U.S. Cellular Field.

"If you hadn't seen the first 161 games this year, you could look at this game and somewhat epitomize or wrap up our entire season," Farrell said. "We finished, obviously at an even .500, but it was the characteristic that this team has demonstrated all year long. We don't give up."

The Blue Jays hovered around the .500 mark all season. The club never won more than six consecutive games, but also didn't lose more than four in a row at any point.

Whenever it seemed that the young club might be headed into a tailspin, it was able to bounce back and find solid ground once again.

Part of that had to do with a solid 39-42 record on the road compared to playing just three games above .500 at home. For Farrell, the final tally is a fair indication of the way his team played this season.

"We're a .500 team -- that's not satisfying, that's just, I think where we are right now," Farrell said. "We've gone through a lot of change, and at the same time, because we've played in many stretches very well on the road, this team doesn't shy away from challenges or environments that might be hostile.

"I think that goes hand in hand with the resiliency and the overall characteristics and personality of the team."

The Blue Jays secured at least a .500 record for the fifth time in the past six seasons thanks in part to another come-from-behind victory -- it was the ninth time the club won a game in which it was trailing after the seventh inning.


http://toronto.bluejays.mlb.com/mlb/gam ... p&c_id=tor

10 Being the best on the poll.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,132
And1: 31,725
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#2 » by tsherkin » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:34 pm

I'm not a fan of his choices as far as the running game, the lineup or his substitutions (or lack thereof).

Can't really say he's any better or worse than what we've seen on this team recently, though.
DonYon
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 330
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
         

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#3 » by DonYon » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:48 pm

as long as the players & coaches aren't complaining he's fine.
Wo1verine
2015 Beat the Commish Champion
Posts: 17,585
And1: 11,768
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
     

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#4 » by Wo1verine » Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:17 pm

How many different lineups did he use this year? It must have been close to a record, a lot of the time it seemed like he didn't know his player personal batting guys like Arencibia and Rasmus below Molina, McCoy leadoff, etc.
Image
BrunoSkull
User avatar
JoeyBats
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,254
And1: 407
Joined: Jul 07, 2011

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#5 » by JoeyBats » Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:10 pm

I gave him a 6.
I think he improved as the season went on, still needs to work on the line up card.
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#6 » by Nolan » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:20 pm

I gave him a 6. He got better as the season went on but he stills need to figure a lot of things out.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,374
And1: 13,037
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#7 » by SharoneWright » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:24 pm

AA defends:

Cites ability to admit mistakes:

http://www.fan590.com/ondemand/media.js ... 30617_7172
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
The Flying Gent
Veteran
Posts: 2,562
And1: 1,275
Joined: May 29, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#8 » by The Flying Gent » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:29 pm

Who the hell tells Brett Lawrie to bunt with RISP?! You suck!

But really, i hope a lot of the weird stuff he did this year was just his process of getting first hand experience on what works and what doesn't. And he'll hopefully be better nest year.
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 674
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#9 » by Homer Jay » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:31 pm

He got better as the season went on. Both in game management and player handling.

Not his fault he got saddled with Rivera, Patterson, Nix, Davis, Hill, Snider, Rauch, Drabek, and Cecil. All those guys stunk it up on their own.

He overused some bullpen guys early, notably Camp, who got a lot better after he was not pitching 8-9 innings a week out of the pen.

He does need to better decide on when to pull pitchers. And IMHO not be so reliant on certain players batting at certain positions. Ride the guys who are performing, and we won't have JBau getting left on base 100 times a year. Follow the guy with the monster .449 OBP with someone that can get hits, I don't care about power.
Image
jrsmith
Banned User
Posts: 4,557
And1: 18
Joined: Mar 11, 2009

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#10 » by jrsmith » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:11 pm

I gave him a 5. He got somewhat better as the season went along, and didnt make too many huge, dumb game changing moves as he did early in the season... or maybe I stopped caring as much.

This team has/should have much higher priorities so I dont mind giving a chance to see how much he improves.
Sifu
Veteran
Posts: 2,556
And1: 1,005
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Bizarro World

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#11 » by Sifu » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:59 pm

I gave him a 5 because his lineups were atrocious early on in the season. (ughhhh batting Hill 2nd? Really?).

But overall, he got better as the year went on, and unlike another poster, I actually thought the running game was a nice addition all year long.
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#12 » by satyr9 » Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:02 am

I'd give him something in the middle too, but at the same time I think it's almost impossible to tell a future terrible manager from a future HOFer after their first season. I didn't see any noticeable signs that he was going to be great or anything and maybe a few that didn't look too hot, but the fact people can point to what they perceived as positive progression hopefully means something.

I do think being willing to make strange calls and admit errors can't be a bad thing, as long as there comes a time where we can notice some pay-off.
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,374
And1: 13,037
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#13 » by SharoneWright » Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:50 pm

3.

He can turn me around next year. But this year, he was not MLB calibre.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
User avatar
Geddy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 69,890
And1: 78,609
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
 

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#14 » by Geddy » Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:57 pm

Not a fan of his at all. I understand it was his first year, but some of the moves he made during games left me scratching my head.
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Alfred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,350
And1: 20,853
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
 

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#15 » by Alfred » Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:32 pm

Homer Jay wrote:Rivera, Patterson, Nix, Davis, Hill, Snider, Rauch, Drabek, and Cecil


Image
Image
FreeAgent
Junior
Posts: 256
And1: 7
Joined: Mar 06, 2010

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#16 » by FreeAgent » Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:50 pm

Gave him a 5. Could be better, could be worse. I'll blame it on his lack of experience, for now...
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,132
And1: 31,725
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#17 » by tsherkin » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:34 pm

Sifu wrote:I gave him a 5 because his lineups were atrocious early on in the season. (ughhhh batting Hill 2nd? Really?).

But overall, he got better as the year went on, and unlike another poster, I actually thought the running game was a nice addition all year long.


I did enjoy that we TRIED the running game, and I do recognize that he got less stupid as he learned about what works and what doesn't, but it was frustrating that he'd make odd running gambles that even I know are bluntly (Please Use More Appropriate Word). It was his first year and he was more of a pitching coach in his time with Boston, so it's not super surprising that he didn't know what he was doing. We'll see how it goes going forward. In his defense, it could be said that he was trying to maximize our chances when we DID get runners on, because we didn't exactly knock socks off with our below-average team OBP.

It's not like we're on the cusp, or anything; his mistakes didn't cost us a pennant or the wild card or whatever, so it's not exactly a big deal, we can afford to give him some time.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: John Farrell Approval Rating (Season End) 

Post#18 » by flatjacket1 » Sat Oct 1, 2011 9:29 pm

4. Steals too much, don't like the hit and run, batted a rookie 2nd.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick

Return to Toronto Blue Jays