Shimso wrote:Hendrix wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:CC's opting out tonight...might as well throw all your money at him and see what happens. He'd be a better $100+M investment than Darvish.
I agree with you from a fan standpoint. From an investment-revenue generating standpoint I tihnk Rogers could potentially rather have Darvish no?
He's a lower risk investment. You know what you're getting with CC & it sends a message & it instantly knocks NYY down a peg (who'll be their ace if they don't get CJ? Nova?).
I'd rather overpay for CC and sacrifice whatever Darvish's ceiling is and whatever revenue he'll attract because any move that makes your team much stronger right away AND hurts one of your biggest rivals is perfect.
Hell, if Ellsbury were an FA I'd say give him 30M.
I fully understand how a CC move would be better for us from a winning standpoint, and a making our competioion worse standpoint. What I was getting at was that Randle said he was a better "investment". I'm just saying from Rogers' (who wants to make money) perspective, they might see Darvish as the better "investment" if he is more likely to give a good rate of return cash-wise.