Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
- hyper316
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,748
- And1: 10,033
- Joined: Dec 23, 2006
-
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
just came home and saw the SN highlights. the OF should have played much deeper to not allow the runner on 1B to score, Thames is known for a weak arm, anything going pass him in the OF is gg
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
-
- Junior
- Posts: 258
- And1: 10
- Joined: May 16, 2012
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
How the Rays put together a hideous lineup like that and take 2 of 3 from us I'll never know.
Two wrongs don't make a right, and three rights... make a left.
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
- TorontoJock
- Freshman
- Posts: 94
- And1: 36
- Joined: Jan 28, 2009
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
No LF was stopping that runner from scoring. Thames played the ball well off the wall, didn't bobble, and got it in quickly. Lawrie didn't even bother throwing it because the runner had already scored. To have a play at the plate the LF would have had to cut the ball off before it got to the wall, which is an impossible play.
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,097
- And1: 3,628
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
TorontoJock wrote:No LF was stopping that runner from scoring. Thames played the ball well off the wall, didn't bobble, and got it in quickly. Lawrie didn't even bother throwing it because the runner had already scored. To have a play at the plate the LF would have had to cut the ball off before it got to the wall, which is an impossible play.
he fielded it cleanly, it just took him way too long to do so. he chases after it, the ball caroms off the wall, and he just waits for it to trickle into his glove. and then of course he overthrows the cutoff man.
bottom line, thames is a poor fielder and shouldn't have been out there anyway. he's hacking desperately at the dish now too so for now he's the goat.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,065
- And1: 53
- Joined: Jan 05, 2012
- Location: The kandy-kolored tangerine-flake streamline baby
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
I was able to view to the last two innings. Didn't see Romero walking a congo-line of players through the first however many innings he pitched, so I didn't get the impression that we were lucky to be in it regardless. And it was almost sad to see us lose this game on a Roger-Dorn play that put a runner on for Upton's double down the line.
Whoever that was inching into the plate the entire at-bat, trying to take one for the team, I hate him. He didn't try to get out the way on any of the pitches. That's just stupid baseball. The game is too athletic now to go back to this "take-one-for-the-team" crap.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9XkWdi45VM[/youtube]
Whoever that was inching into the plate the entire at-bat, trying to take one for the team, I hate him. He didn't try to get out the way on any of the pitches. That's just stupid baseball. The game is too athletic now to go back to this "take-one-for-the-team" crap.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9XkWdi45VM[/youtube]
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,065
- And1: 53
- Joined: Jan 05, 2012
- Location: The kandy-kolored tangerine-flake streamline baby
Re: Blue Jays (24-19) @ Rays (25-18) | May 21 - 23
^ Actually, even Bob Uecker wasn't fooled.
It's a sorry way to win, and a sorry way to lose.
A pox on both your houses!
It's a sorry way to win, and a sorry way to lose.
A pox on both your houses!