ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#21 » by satyr9 » Fri Jun 8, 2012 7:46 pm

-MetA4- wrote:
torontoaces04 wrote:BTW, I've done a bit of background on him as an FB prospect...he's a 4-star recruit, but nowhere near where he's ranked in baseball.


He was absolutely one of the top QB recruits in last year's class.

This is a good risk signing, but its hard to really imagine how well it will work out. Letting him play football will hurt his development (these football/baseball things rarely work out), and what really hurts is that he actually ended up at a far lesser football school than his skills suggest. Realistically you'd hope that he'd eventually give up football and play baseball full-time, but the fact that he signed with USM means that he is almost a shoe-in to start and play early. He is their best football sign in years and USM plays in a mid-major conference. Had he ended up at LSU or Alabama he realistically could have rode the bench and been more inclined to give up football.


Yeah best case for something like this is probably Samardizja (sic) where he starts his after h.s. baseball career at 22ish and you end up with a pretty nice controlled player at 26-27. Nothing wrong with that for a 3rd rounder, but that does feel like best case (BTW, I'm sure there's a better case, but that's just what I thought of). Anyway, spending on high upside gambles is totally fine with me. You take enough spins you're gonna hit eventually and the ones that do pay off like crazy.
User avatar
Garmfay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,795
And1: 542
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: LeBronto
     

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#22 » by Garmfay » Fri Jun 8, 2012 8:32 pm

Also Kyle Parker (#4th rated QB recruiting class) Rockies 1st round pick in 2010 gave up Clemson QB job for baseball.
Image
Credit to Turbo_Zone
"The Lion does not concern himself with the opinion of the sheep"
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 674
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#23 » by Homer Jay » Fri Jun 8, 2012 9:42 pm

Very few pick Football over Baseball. Non-guaranteed contracts, shorter careers, much more injury risk. An agent will steer him in the right direction.
Image
User avatar
torontoaces04
Analyst
Posts: 3,365
And1: 518
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Contact:
       

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#24 » by torontoaces04 » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:04 pm

-MetA4- wrote:
torontoaces04 wrote:BTW, I've done a bit of background on him as an FB prospect...he's a 4-star recruit, but nowhere near where he's ranked in baseball.


He was absolutely one of the top QB recruits in last year's class.

This is a good risk signing, but its hard to really imagine how well it will work out. Letting him play football will hurt his development (these football/baseball things rarely work out), and what really hurts is that he actually ended up at a far lesser football school than his skills suggest. Realistically you'd hope that he'd eventually give up football and play baseball full-time, but the fact that he signed with USM means that he is almost a shoe-in to start and play early. He is their best football sign in years and USM plays in a mid-major conference. Had he ended up at LSU or Alabama he realistically could have rode the bench and been more inclined to give up football.


He was the #10 ranked QB by scouts.com, overall he was #135, so he's not a "can't miss" prospect by any definition. Also, a 6'1 QB is the equivalent of a 5'9 starting pitcher in baseball. He does have the inside track to the starters job with Austin Davis leaving, but it's far from a given. Although I'm sure everyone has heard of USM's most famous Alumni, Brett Favre, they are far from a football powerhouse.

He's a great football player, but he's a terrific baseball player...and being 6'1, he's not getting signed for anywhere near what he'd make in the MLB, if at all. The heights of the top 7 QB's drafted last year; 6'4, 6'2, 6'4, 6'4, 6'7, 6'3, 6'5. The QB who was 6'2 was RG3, who was a phenom...

To make a long story short, he's choosing baseball.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#25 » by -MetA4- » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:36 pm

torontoaces04 wrote:He was the #10 ranked QB by scouts.com, overall he was #135, so he's not a "can't miss" prospect by any definition.


College football and recruiting is my other sport obsession and I just so happen to be a die-hard Auburn fan, which is incidentally right in line location/conference/area-wise to Alford. He was absolutely a top football recruit; top-level SEC caliber. What you have to take into account when trying to analyze his football recruiting ranking is that there are 30 MLB teams in comparison to 120 Division 1 football programs. What does that mean? It means that being a Top 150 football recruit is more or less the equivalent of being a "1st round talent" if you were to apply the draft principle to football recruiting.

Also, a 6'1 QB is the equivalent of a 5'9 starting pitcher in baseball.


No its not. 6'1 is subpar height; but to compare it to being a 5'9 pitcher is absurd. Being shorter simply means that he'll have to possess other tools...which he does: his absolutely elite athleticism for the position.

To make a long story short, he's choosing .baseball


Sorry, but if he likes football better then thats likely what he will choose. Russell Wilson chose football over baseball and he's a sub-5'11 QB.
User avatar
torontoaces04
Analyst
Posts: 3,365
And1: 518
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Contact:
       

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#26 » by torontoaces04 » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:38 pm

-MetA4- wrote:
torontoaces04 wrote:He was the #10 ranked QB by scouts.com, overall he was #135, so he's not a "can't miss" prospect by any definition.


College football and recruiting is my other sport obsession and I just so happen to be a die-hard Auburn fan, which is incidentally right in line location/conference/area-wise to Alford. He was absolutely a top football recruit; top-level SEC caliber. What you have to take into account when trying to analyze his football recruiting ranking is that there are 30 MLB teams in comparison to 120 Division 1 football programs. What does that mean? It means that being a Top 150 football recruit is more or less the equivalent of being a "1st round talent" if you were to apply the draft principle to football recruiting.

Also, a 6'1 QB is the equivalent of a 5'9 starting pitcher in baseball.


No its not. 6'1 is subpar height; but to compare it to being a 5'9 pitcher is absurd. Being shorter simply means that he'll have to possess other tools...which he does: his absolutely elite athleticism for the position.

To make a long story short, he's choosing .baseball


Sorry, but if he likes football better then thats likely what he will choose. Russell Wilson chose football over baseball and he's a sub-5'11 QB.


I think we're both making a lot of assumptions. I'll agree to disagree on the height aspect, because I wholeheartedly believe his height is a HUGE disadvantage.

Let's just both hope he chooses baseball..
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,308
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#27 » by dagger » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:42 pm

It's interesting that he went from "don't draft me" to "i'll sign and decide later". That could have been his position all along, but it wasn't. And surely, everyone knows the two-sport precedents from past drafts.

I'm not sure the dollars changed his thinking or that AA/Tinnish were that persuasive. But some time has gone by since his commit to S. Miss, and there has been an awful lot of bad publicity for football because of head injuries. There has been the bounty scandal in New Orleans, and lots of stories about dead and dying retired players. if I were his father I'd be urging him to hedge his bets and give harder look to that safer, more lucrative sport of baseball he must also like playing. And maybe the Jays gave him the out to do just that and lock in some nice bonus money.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Al_Oliver
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 201
Joined: Nov 20, 2011
       

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#28 » by Al_Oliver » Sat Jun 9, 2012 1:04 am

Brees is the only successful, current QB in the NFL that is around 6'. I can't think of any others.
If you aren't 6'3" at least, a lot of teams won't even give you the time of day
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#29 » by satyr9 » Sat Jun 9, 2012 2:43 am

torontoaces04 wrote:
-MetA4- wrote:redacted
redacted


I think where you're disagreeing is more about his prospect value after NCAA vs. his prospect value for the NCAA. Being a 100ish ranked prospect does make a first rounder equivalent for 120 div I schools, but being the 10th best QB in a single year, under-sized, and going to a mid-major does not give you a great chance of being a high-end NFL QB draft prospect. Of course no one of those things means he can't play pro-ball, but he does have enough in his way, when it's already a pretty tough haul, that imagining he'll end up in baseball professionally isn't that crazy a notion. He could have 3-4 great years starting at USM and still have almost no shot at pro football, 'cause the competition for QB jobs in the NFL is pretty darn steep. I'm not saying I know anything, just that aces04 seems to be talking about Alford's professional prospect status not being elite and met is talking about his NCAA prospect status being elite, which IMO it appears that both of you are right. For instance, were 10 QBs selected in the last pro draft? Does anyone have any belief we'll see much of more than 1 fluke guy drafted after the 3rd round (QB specifically, not all positions)? Sure there are Brady freak picks and more commonly Cassel types (and I hate the Pats), but they're like 8-10 round MLB picks, maybe 1/30 actually amount to anything.

I will say 6'1" isn't that insurmountable a problem IMO. If he plays well enough to have a legit shot at a real pro football career, being 2-3 inches under ideal won't stop him (as long as he's a legit 6'1" and not really 5'11", but that's a matter for the combine). Also, it's not exactly unheard of for an 18 year-old to grab another inch or two before he's 22 and would render the point totally moot, unlike say a 5'9" college guy who isn't ever going to be anything but a midget for his position, who still went in the first round anyway 'cause he can bring it.
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 9,330
And1: 3,027
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#30 » by polo007 » Sat Jun 9, 2012 8:12 am

http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/arti ... otball-USM

Alford is expected to report to the Blue Jays’ minor league facility in Dunedin, Fla., today, where he will undergo a physical before attending mini-camp.

He’ll spend the next two weeks in the Blue Jays’ instructional league before returning to Hattiesburg on June 23.

Every summer after this year, Alford will spend 4-7 weeks in the Blue Jays’ minor league system.

“I discussed everything with my family and all of my coaches for quite a while,” he said. “Basically, I came to the conclusion that this is what is best for me and my family.”

The former Petal star quarterback, who led the Panthers to their first-ever playoff victory during his senior year and a Class 6A South State title, said he had many discussions with the Golden Eagle football coaching staff before coming to a decision.

“Coach (Ellis) Johnson and I, we talked,” Alford said. “Coach Johnson was all for it.”

Alford declined to comment on the terms of the deal he reached with the Blue Jays, but according to a Baseball America report, his contract will be worth close to double the $424,400 value assigned to the 112th overall pick.
Moxie
Junior
Posts: 268
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 28, 2011

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#31 » by Moxie » Sat Jun 9, 2012 1:31 pm

Hmm. I was hoping they'd have him longer than 4-7 weeks per year...
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,449
And1: 17,975
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Jays may sign Alford after all - let him play FB 

Post#32 » by Schad » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:47 am

Moxie wrote:Hmm. I was hoping they'd have him longer than 4-7 weeks per year...


It's a gamble that he'll quit football in the next year or two, essentially. If he does, we get a prospect who wasn't expected to sign at all for $1m or less.
Image
**** your asterisk.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays