Avenger wrote:that might be because you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Bautista and Gose are the only players in that deal with any significant value. Maybe you're one of the delusional Jays fans who thinks JP is a top 10 catcher or that Lind is back to his 2009 form or that you're getting A prospects for 2 months of Darren Oliver.
Justin Masterson can be a reliable 2/3 guy in the AL East and Vinnie Pestano is one of the best relievers in Baseball. The offence actually gets better, yeah the down grade from Bautista to Choo(who is bouncing back to his .300 AVG and .400 OBP level) is significant but you more than make up for it by replacing that bum behind the plate with one of the best catchers in Baseball who just had a poor first half but is otherwise an on base machine.
It makes absolutely no sense.
If you trade Buatista, you're trading him to build, not compete. If you aspire to compete in this division, then why the hell would you trade one of the best hitters in the entire Major Leagues, who also has (arguably) the best contract? It doesn't make sense.
Choo is okay, but he's not very young, and Pestano is a reliever. Justin Masterson is likely a four, maybe a number three, in the AL East, while Michael Brantley simply isn't very good. Carlos Santana is the only attractive piece in that deal, and there's no way you trade Bautista and Gose, along with an old but valuable reliever in Oliver, for Carlos Santana and a bunch of pieces the Jays already have (excluding Choo, but he would be useless in the case of a rebuild). Not to mention that we already have a catcher for the future in d'Arnaud, so you would probably be acquiring Santana as a first-baseman who can fill in at catcher once in a while.
In any scenario where Bautista is traded (obviously there's a very small chance he will be), you can rest assured that this will not be a deal that takes place. Not while Anthopoulos is the GM, anyway.