ImageImageImageImageImage

Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
baulderdash77
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
     

Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#1 » by baulderdash77 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:16 am

Last year we had obviously pretty terrible pitching from our starters. In total our starters logged 916 IP and surrendered 491 ER giving us a starter's ERA of 4.8.

Now if you sub out our starters not named Romero & Morrow and sub in Dickey, Johnson & Buehrle you get new numbers of 931 IP and 393 ER- a decrease down to an ERA of 3.79 and 98 runs. Actually 105 runs when you consider the innings displaced by relievers (b/c of double counting of innings).

You can't expect that performance exactly, but Bill James has given out his projections for 2013 already on Fangraphs. Here's the results: 999 IP and 409 ER (3.68 ERA)- good for a savings of 82 raw runs saved and 122 runs saved when you consider the innings displaced by relievers (b/c of double counting of innings)

Bill James projections include a major regression back for RA Dickey & Brandon Morrow with a major improvement in Romero & smaller improvement for Johnson. He has Buehrle just about the same.

These projections would have us 2nd in the AL (after the Rays) and tied for 5th in MLB for starter's ERA. The Rays are head and shoulders ahead of anyone else. Even after losing Shields they'll still have the best rotation probably.

Overall, if the offense didn't change a bit from last year, and the bullpen gave us a similar 4.33 ERA as last year our run differential would go from -68 to somewhere between +37 to +54 and a Pythagorean projected wins total of 85 to 87 wins.

For reference here is the raw #'s of Bill James' projections.

Code: Select all

Name         W   L   ERA   GS   IP   ER   SO   BB
Dickey         16   8   3.58   34   226   90   152   56
Johnson         13   9   3.21   31   196   70   166   62
Buehrle         11   12   3.78   31   205   86   106   41
Morrow         11   9   3.47   30   187   72   191   66
Romero         8   12   4.43   32   185   91   140   89


Image
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#2 » by BigLeagueChew » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:26 pm

Just to add to your post, our Pyth win/loss in 1991 when we made the playoffs but lost in the ALCS was 88-74, so it would seem like we're definitely on the right track as far as that is concerned.
User avatar
baulderdash77
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#3 » by baulderdash77 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:26 pm

Considering that our offense should be quite a bit better with a full season of Bautista, Reyes & Cabrera I think we're right in there for 90+ wins.
Image
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#4 » by satyr9 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:54 pm

Code: Select all

Name----   IP-----   GS--   TBF   H---   ER-   HR-   BB   K--   ERA-   WHIP
Dickey--   219.0--   32--   888   194-   71-   20-   53   180   2.92   1.13
Johnson-   202.1--   32--   831   178-   72-   12-   65   184   3.20   1.20
Morrow--   188.1--   32--   791   162-   82-   19-   70   195   3.92   1.23
Buehrle-   207.2--   32--   867   218-   88-   23-   44   117   3.81   1.26
Romero--   208.2--   32--   849   198   103-   19-   95   142   4.44   1.40
Happ----   185.1--   32--   810   183-   99-   24-   84   171   4.81   1.44
                              
2013Jays   1,026.0   160   4226   950   416-   93   327   818   3.65   1.24
2012Rays   993.2--   162   4109   879   369-   99   320   900   3.34   1.21
2012Jays   916.0--   162   3953   932   491   134   368   639   4.82   1.42


Okay, so I took a weighted (50/30/20) average of their last 3 years and normalized that average to 32 starts (this is by no means a perfect or even justifiable exercise, but I am not an algo guy so it's just a quick and dirty way to give their numbers some historical context). This is not meant in any way to be predictive of the staff, just that if you just do the weighted part (like James) in the context of a team you can get some odd results. Happ is not included in the 2013 totals, but I showed him to give you a sense of what you might get if he replaced anyone for a period of time. Dashes after numbers are only there to make the columns line up.

All I can say is, barring something fairly dramatic happening in terms of injuries or individual collapses, AA just took a bottom 5 staff and made it top 5.

EDIT: Numbers are totally changed as I discovered I weighted my average upside down. I couldn't figure out why JJ looked so damn good.
User avatar
baulderdash77
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#5 » by baulderdash77 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:31 pm

So your analysis shows us at 407 and James comes in at 409. I'd say it's pretty close overall with some puts and takes in there. Either way it's a huge improvement.

To expand on the batters side. Last year we scored 712 runs. I ran a baseball lineup simulator with the lineup below and came up with 776 runs.

With James' projections of our batting order, combined with our new pitching staff we get a Pythagorean wins of 93. So on a macro basis we should be in the running as there's always a few wins +/- because of luck and we're still assuming a constant bullpen production.

Code: Select all

Avg Runs Per Game: 4.80

Runs For 162 Games: 776

Order   Name   G   RBI   R
1   Reyes   150   62   89
2   Cabrera   150   82   84
3   Bautista   150   111   104
4   Encarnacion   150   100   91
5   Lawrie   150   81   77
6   Lind   150   87   70
7   Rasmus   150   73   70
8   Arencibia   150   78   68
9   Bonifacio   150   40   63
Image
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#6 » by Skin Blues » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:22 pm

This is what I have personally, objectively via numbers, projected for the Blue Jays new rotation, accounting for changes in ballparks:

R.A. Dickey 3.67
Josh Johnson 3.59
Brandon Morrow 3.77
Mark Buehrle 4.41
Ricky Romero 4.38

For a rough average of 3.96 if they all stay healthy. That would have been 5th in the AL last season, when we had a 4.82 ERA from our starters. Doesn't seem like as big an improvement as I'd have thought at first, but there's room for improvement for Morrow and Romero. Although JJ is a bit low since the formula doesn't take into account his injury that caused the drop in performance last season which can't simply be regressed to his former skill level. Happ comes in at 4.81 which for a 6th starter, is more than acceptable.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,307
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#7 » by dagger » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:35 pm

Well, one of the impacts is that I can buy tickets for just about any game and not worry that I will get Aaron Laffey pitching that day.

Olney suggests this rotation

Dickey
Morrow - hardest thrower
Buehrle - softest thrower
Johnson - fairly hard thrower
Romero - fairly hard thrower
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
satyr9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,892
And1: 563
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#8 » by satyr9 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:03 pm

Code: Select all

Name----   PA---   H-   HR--   R   RBI-   BB---   K---   BA--   OBP--   SLG--   OPS
J.Reyes   675-   184-   10-   93-   54-   52--   55   0.300   0.350   0.449   0.798
M.Cabre   662-   192-   14-   97-   76-   43--   85   0.316   0.355   0.470   0.825
J.Bauti   648-   141-   45   104   107   108-   107   0.267   0.384   0.576   0.960
E.Encar   635-   151-   35-   88-   94-   70--   94   0.274   0.348   0.518   0.866
B.Lawri   621-   157-   16-   86-   61-   41-   102   0.276   0.319   0.431   0.750
C.Rasmu   608-   127-   21-   81-   70-   54-   146   0.233   0.298   0.414   0.711
J.Arenc   436--   91-   21-   48-   67-   26-   124   0.226   0.268   0.437   0.705
A.Lind-   426--   99-   17-   38-   58-   29--   84   0.253   0.300   0.432   0.733
M.Iztur   416--   99--   4-   45-   31-   31--   51   0.263   0.313   0.353   0.665
E.Bonif   434-   107--   2-   52-   21-   39--   86   0.278   0.336   0.356   0.692
R.Davis   326--   79--   4-   42-   29-   17--   61   0.261   0.294   0.376   0.671
J.Thole   217--   49--   1-   14-   17-   19--   28   0.253   0.313   0.314   0.628
D.Coope   109--   26--   3-   12-   14--   9--   14   0.263   0.321   0.434   0.755
                                 
13Jays   6213   1502   193   800   699   538   1037   0.270   0.338   0.441   0.779
12Yank   6231   1462   245   804   774   565   1176   0.265   0.337   0.453   0.790
12Jays   6094   1346   198   716   677   473   1251   0.245   0.309   0.407   0.716


Same thing with the lineup, but normalized for PA instead of 32 starts. Craziest part was a column I removed to make it fit in the layout, projected for 44 Triples. Also the R and RBI projections are ludicrous (too many lead-off hitters, not enough middle of the order guys for history).

Again, this is a perfectly healthy squad so forget all that, but again it's the kind of place to start and maybe sub things in and out to see what's likely. We're also getting a lot of credit for Melky and E5 here, but I thought it'd be fair to keep the approach as consistent as possible.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 66,129
And1: 60,930
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#9 » by Raps in 4 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:30 pm

Griping about the Dickey trade aside, I am very excited about about this lineup/rotation.
User avatar
Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 17,030
And1: 3,662
Joined: May 30, 2007
Location: London, Ontario

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#10 » by Hendrix » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:11 pm

dagger wrote:Well, one of the impacts is that I can buy tickets for just about any game and not worry that I will get Aaron Laffey pitching that day.

Olney suggests this rotation

Dickey
Morrow - hardest thrower
Buehrle - softest thrower
Johnson - fairly hard thrower
Romero - fairly hard thrower

Johnson's arguably our best pitcher, so I don't think you can put him way down there. I'd go.

Johnson
Dickey
Morrow
Buehrle
Romero

Dickey would split up the two fireballers pretty nicely imo.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
User avatar
Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 17,030
And1: 3,662
Joined: May 30, 2007
Location: London, Ontario

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#11 » by Hendrix » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:15 pm

I think James's projections were done when 3 of these guys were in the NL as well, so you'd probably have to make an adjustment there too, as they will now be facing a DH ever 9th batter instead of a pitcher.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
User avatar
baulderdash77
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 12, 2003
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#12 » by baulderdash77 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:26 pm

You're right. The historical difference between AL & NL is about .3 runs per game.
Image
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#13 » by flatjacket1 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:37 pm

baulderdash77 wrote:You're right. The historical difference between AL & NL is about .3 runs per game.


Yes, and those even change fWAR totals as run environment plays a huge factor in calculating it.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
Ado05
RealGM
Posts: 18,213
And1: 6,088
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Projections for this year's starting pitching & impact 

Post#14 » by Ado05 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:20 pm

Damn, makes me wish that the season was sooner. Hopefully we can play well on the field.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays