ImageImageImageImageImage

Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal

Moderator: JaysRule15

Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 38,099
And1: 21,187
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal 

Post#21 » by Randle McMurphy » Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:53 am

Hoopstarr wrote:When the quantity of fringe prospects is FIVE it's very significant. They weren't quite as fringe back then either.

They were pretty fringe (and have largely become even more so with the exception of Woj over the last year). You're probably not getting a MLB quality starting pitcher back (which Happ is) for only a couple of these guys.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal 

Post#22 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:37 pm

There There wrote:
Graham's Cracker wrote:
Rollins and Woj join the rule 5 eligible this year.


Correct... but last year, only Perez was eligible. And there was zero chance of losing him last off season to the rule 5.


Either way we'd have to make some serious decisions to protect some of the players this year. The rule-5 was invented to trash teams like the Jays for just loading up on specs.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
dkmo
Sophomore
Posts: 147
And1: 83
Joined: Oct 16, 2010

Re: Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal 

Post#23 » by dkmo » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:29 pm

His best deal: dumping Wells to the Angels.
His worst deal: dumping Napoli to the Rangers.
Ain't that funny?
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 18,940
And1: 11,190
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal 

Post#24 » by tecumseh18 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:02 pm

Here's the thing about the Napoli deal. We weren't going for it in 2011. We wanted to play the kids, including *sigh* JPA. We wanted to leave space for Lawrie to come up and shift EE to first/DH along with Lind.

"Playing the kids" also meant protecting the young starting rotation. What AA has been attempting to do every year he's GM is build up a fearsome relief corps. Finally he achieved it in 2013, but it wasn't for lack of trying in previous seasons. Francisco meant more to the Jays long-term development than Napoli did.

What I've always wondered was that if we had somehow managed to keep Rolen and Doc and pick up Napoli while Bautista still emerged the way he did, whether we could have been a contender. Not as good as the Phillies, but perhaps able to play meaningful games in September.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 38,099
And1: 21,187
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Toronto Star: Alex Anthopolous's worst deal 

Post#25 » by Randle McMurphy » Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:04 pm

tecumseh18 wrote:What I've always wondered was that if we had somehow managed to keep Rolen and Doc and pick up Napoli while Bautista still emerged the way he did, whether we could have been a contender. Not as good as the Phillies, but perhaps able to play meaningful games in September.

The Jays could have potentially contended with the 2008/2009 core that they broke up to rebuild/save some payroll, but it would have definitely required some improvements (they made none in the 2008 offseason). And you also have to consider the fact that Bautista never likely would have emerged if Rios was never waived as part of that cost saving effort, so that hypothetical doesn't really work anyway.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays