Jays4WS wrote:changes wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
I didn't know an anti-Shapiro stance wasn't allowed here.
I can separate Rogers being cheap with Shapiro being an overrated GM just okay thanks.
Quick summary when anyone has criticized his actual moves, as in the actual players he brought.
-doesn't understand the logistics aka any cheap move was the right move
-aa fanboy
-bandwagonner
-price wasn't coming back therefore happ was the right move
-rogers was not spending therefore chaves was the right move
-price and rogers... therefore 27m between dickey, happ, and chaves was the right move
-my favourite 'well what would you have done/you can't do any better" aka the classic 7 year colangelo defence
There's a few more.
The Rogers apologists on this board are hilarious. It's pathetic what they do to defend Rogers decisions.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Who's a Rogers apologist around here? Seriously, give me a name.