Schad wrote:Skin Blues wrote:Apparently being 64th in wOBA among regular outfielders over the span of 2 years makes you a league average hitter. I don't see why that's a problem. The argument could be that he isn't a good hitter despite the results and projections, not that he strikes out too much. However, he's been about a league average hitter by wRC+ the past 2 years, and both ZiPS and Steamer project him to be barely above a league average hitter again in 2018. So it's a fair assumption to say he's a league average hitter, regardless where he ranks among outfielders with >750 PA over the past two seasons. With his defense (both career defense and projected defense) that is objectively worth about 1.5 to 2 WAR per season, and all 3 of his team control years occur during the typical peak for hitters; ages 26-28. To argue he's not a 1.5 to 2 WAR player, you'd have to say that something will change this year that has not already changed, since he's already stuck out in 30% of his plate appearances in each of the past 3 seasons. Predicting those kinds of changes is typically not something that the best scouts or projection algorithms are capable of doing accurately, let alone people casually browsing through a guy's stats. So we really have no reason to think he'll be bad because he strikes out a lot, or that his batting profile doesn't work well with our lineup.
As for the Cardinals giving up on him as I've seen said in other places, I think it's more that they simply have better players now. Ozuna, Pham, and Fowler are all better than him, so he's the odd man out without enough playing time to justify keeping him. They had a chance to get what they see as a 3.5-4 WAR player from the Marlins and they jumped at it. Luckily (or unluckily) for us, Grichuk was a significant upgrade over our current 3rd outfielder, which is probably either Carrera, an unproven Teoscar, or an out of position and injury prone Pearce. I get that people want us to tank so any move to improve the current roster is a net negative since it costs money and assets we could use on prospects, but this trade moves the needle a tick towards being a playoff team for the next 3 years at a pretty minor cost.
It's a problem for the simple reason that playing a league-average hitter in a corner OF spot is a much different proposition than playing one in a middle infield spot. A 2 WAR player over a full season of PAs is, by definition, an starter; Grichuk's production on a WAR/650 basis has also trended down in each of his seasons thus far.
So what we're left with is a player who, if he doesn't improve, is eminently replaceable given the position he plays, and who with a little more erosion becomes a below-average option at a position teeming with options.
Again, if he can be a plus defender in CF, that changes. If he's not that, he's a deeply flawed player at the position with the deepest pool of offensive talent in baseball.
You are not very good at convincing me that getting a 26 year old 1.5+ WAR player with 3 years of cheap control in return for a middle reliever with poor projection is a bad trade, haha. The worst things you can say that actually hold water are that a) he doesn't play SS, and b) if he gets worse he'll be below average. The horror!!